Posted on 12/05/2004 2:50:08 PM PST by Dashing Dasher
A republican admits that bush stole the election (albany / el cerrito) Reply to: anon-51272523@craigslist.org Date: 2004-12-05, 1:38PM PST
Voter Fraud - Please Read My Explanation Below
27.Nov.2004
Brad Menfillink
Brad Menfil is not my real name. I work for the RNC. I fear reprisals if I'm found out.
The truth about this election is this: Florida and Ohio had to go for Bush in order for him to "win" the election. In reality he lost both states. In fact, he did not even win the popular vote. He lost the national popular vote by at least 1,750,000. This shows you the scale of the fraud.
The exit polls were not wrong. Kerry was the clear winner, but victory was snatched from him.
Florida first. The 200,000+ margin of victory for Bush made this state uncontestable. Everybody assumes that even with some fraud, Kerry could never have made up the difference in a recount. But Kerry actually won by about 750,000 votes. The numbers were changed by a computer program (in both electronic and scan-tron voting systems) called "KerryLite." "KerryLite" of course is not actual name of the program. The actual name is 11-5-18-18 etc. For additional encryption, the numbers were jumbled but I'm not sure in which order. The numbers replace the letters of the alphabet. For example, K is the eleventh letter of the alphabet.
So the if-then statement goes something like this: "if total true Kerry>total true Bush, Bush x 1.04x (.04 is a random number)(total true Kerry), total true Bush". The second part of the equation takes the total number of votes cast and subtracts the new Bush total, subtracts the third party totals and leaves the rest for Kerry.
Sometimes the program would also reduce third party votes and award them to Bush. And even where Bush legitimately won, he was still awarded additional votes. The big Democratic counties (Broward for example) went to Kerry because it had to appear that everything was on the up and up. It's interesting to see this unfold. Does anybody wonder why the Republican counties were mostly counted after the Democratic counties? You should wonder, and also know that this was no accident. The Bush team had to make up the votes as the night went on.
In Ohio, computer voting fraud, vote tossing and voter suppression were the main methods. Vote tossing was simply the removal of Kerry votes and some third party votes. In some areas, the Bush vs. Kerry votes were absurd. Nine to one, eight to two.
Voter suppression took the form of making voters stand in four hour long lines. This of course took place in Democratic areas. The simplest thing to do was to have too few voting machines. Sometimes that's all it takes. People eventually lose patience and leave without casting a vote.
In other states such as New Mexico, Nevada, Iowa and New Hampshire, Kerry's leads evaporated very quickly once the polls were shut down. Kerry only won New Hampshire, but barely. As it turned out, the lead was 6% for Kerry in that state and not enough fraudulent activity took place to flip the state to Bush.
So this will all come out and be known to everyone. Nothing this massive can be kept a secret. You're already beginning to see these "irregularities" and the whisper will become a roar.
Hang in there!
Many of the moonbats are responding with Impeachment Stories.
Do I hear CONSPIRACY THEORY?
...hey, and what about the Nazi base in the South Pole?
Psy...cho...sis... Alert!
Nothing here. Even DU has debunked it:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x115695
Off to take a shower!
BWAHAHAHAHAHA BWAHAHAHAHAHA BWAHAHAHAHAHA... yep, its the VRWC at work and we just haven't gotten to the poor fellow yet. BWAHAHAHAHA BWAHAHAHAHA BWAHAHAHAHA
"Voter suppression took the form of making voters stand in four hour long lines. This of course took place in Democratic areas. The simplest thing to do was to have too few voting machines. Sometimes that's all it takes. People eventually lose patience and leave without casting a vote."
This charge discredits them... They should just stick with the black box conspiracy. By its very nature, it is more difficult to completely disprove.
Are you sure this isn't really Keith Olbermann?
Isn't it widely known that we stole the election.....
IMO, this post from some unknown dipstick on another site doesn't reach the level of credible sourcing that rate's it's appearance on this forum.
This is trash.
Ya right, whatever! Like we should believe this Mr. Incognito
What a load of kitty poo. These people are barking.
I just love it ... we can see the outline of the next Michael Moore "movie." I hope and PRAY the Dumbocrats believe it, that Kerry believes it, and that he runs again and beats Hitlery for the nomination. Because, if they do, then they're going to be even more horribly surprised in 2008 when it's not even a contest and the Republican candidates win in a land-slide. Then, they can pour on the insane conspiracy theories big-time and really drive their party into inane meaninglessness. Then, finally, the Republicans can afford to split, with the moderates become the new "left" and the conservatives joining with some version of the Libertarian party and the CENTER will have moved RIGHT. :)
Congressman Billybob
Click for latest, "Appointing Justices to the Supreme Court."
Give Nurse Ratchet a call and tell her Brad, aka Terry McNut, is on the computer again.
Cool airplane on your homepage. Is that a bale of pot on the wing?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.