That being said, Democrat Operative, you were the one who attempted to portray Mr. Robinson as a "Truther", not me and you were pawned while doing so.
I believe the term you are searching your limited internet cred for is......
Posted on 09/24/2010 11:31:46 AM PDT by patlin
proof positive that Obama was ”NOT” a US citizen prior to & in 1968...Sept. 24, 2010
Dear Sen. Thune,
As a member of the Armed Forces Committee & member of the sub-committee on Personnel, I am imploring you to please take this seriously & take immediate action...
(Excerpt) Read more at constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com ...
It is a simple and inexpensive matter for a REAL American to promptly prove with the BEST evidence that they not only were a natural born citizen but also are currently a natural born citizen.
That Obama is behaving as he has and is court martialing a decorated officer over this is justification for RATIONAL Americans to question Obama’s eligibility.
By the way, unless the Hawaiian governor has personally inspected **ALL** the vital records ( which could be almost anything)I would consider this hearsay.
No, you are a liar.
Show your honor, what was your last screen name?
Yes, it is and I'm damn sick of it.
Good people come here and try and discover the truth, have meaningful discussions only to be interrupted by jackass infiltrators....the same ones over and over.
It really freakin irritates me.
BTW, long time noob, the owner of this site would like to see the truth too, you want to call him a truther?
Now you're characterizing the owner of this website as a "Truther"?
Now that 6 out of 10 Americans seriously question Obama’s eligibility, it is getting harder and harder for “The Believers” to ridicule the doubters as somehow being a nutty fringe.
Gee!...And to think that 5 out of 10 doubt Obama’s eligibility is nearly entirely due to millions of people like me. People who have talked with neighbors, friends, and relatives. People who have worked You Tube, Facebook, My Space, and e-mail lists, and sites like Free Republic.
Revealing my previous screen name reveals nothing about my honesty but not revealing it is certainly irritating the Hell out of you!
You're being idiot. That is a fallacious argument. Because Berg believes that Obama is not a natural born citizen( which is correct), and he believes the silly arguments of 9/11 Truthers, therefore, we believe the same in both cases?
You're the one with the problem with the truth if you believe so.
You bet, and that is your whole mission here.
Nothing but lies, deciet and disruption...just like you are trying to twist my post into accusing the owner of this site of being a “truther”
Keep digging fool.
Checking their posting histories shows they have little interest in any other subject. Clearly they have no time for anything else.
Is this it? I don't know.
Unfortunately it will take a Constitutional lawyer with the credentials/skill of a Mark Levin to get the ball rolling. And, I guarantee that won't happen before Nov. 2 for obvious reasons.
Don’t get down on Mark Levin for not being willing to hitch his credibility to someone else’s opinion.
Post it on your Facebook page.
BTW, I too am convinced that Obummer is not a NB citizen.
What difference does it make what I believe? I was designated as a troll because I asked a question. I provided information to support my argument and one of Einstein's illegitimate children tries to threaten me with ostracizition from the site?
But what do I know, I don't play the smartest guy in the room.
But the reality is that the number of people who doubt 0baMao's eligibility has steadily grown to a large majority and political pundits across the spectrum are predicting an historical butt whipping at the polls for Dems in Nov.
Afterbirther logic doesn't hold a drop of water.
Revealing my previous screen name reveals nothing about my honesty but not revealing it is certainly irritating the Hell out of you!
Not admitting to the name you were previously banned under doesn't bother me a bit, it just shows that you are not only a coward but a troll as well and a bad one at that.
Strike two...
So bad, so sad.
> “Ah yes, “Perkins v Elg,” decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1939 and holding that a child born in the United States to alien parents and raised abroad retains U.S. citizenship until the age of majority, and at that point continues to retain U.S. citizenship if he or she elects to retain it, and elects to return to the United States and assume the duties of a U.S. citizen.
Thanks so much for reminding me about the high court’s ruling in Perkins v Elg.”
.
This is a totally false “interpretation” of a judicial case.
This postor ia famous for this kind of deception.
This postor works for the White House under Cass Sundsteen.
.
Line drive hit back to the pitcher who cowers like a girl.
You might convince a slow 10 year old that that logically means he is wrong on one thing because he is wrong on another. Rational people? Not so much.
That being said, Democrat Operative, you were the one who attempted to portray Mr. Robinson as a "Truther", not me and you were pawned while doing so.
I believe the term you are searching your limited internet cred for is......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.