Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
Mombasa Hospital is in the Coastal Province not necessarily Mombasa Provincial Hospital
http://www.mombasahospital.com/history.html
If Nan wants to stand up for Democrat Party corruption all the way to the top, that’s not a good thing for Democrats in future elections. They are too incompetent and stupid to even qualify their candidates for President.
There is power just in the truth being made plain and those who care about the rule of law are going to be furious.
willie@700wlw.com
start from the final paragraph of page seven of nine:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/10313894/The-Myth-of-Barack-Obamas-Early-Life-Leahy-Cached
Whether “Republic” appeared on public documents in 1964 prior to the official recognition of such is something that will need to be researched. Unfortunately, given the pre-Internet era we’re kind of at the mercy of folks on the ground locally, or with connections to Kenya (born in 1964, etc.)
Hey, just wandered over to Daily Kos and some guy is saying “August 5th 1964 was a Saturday, they aren’t open on Saturday, oopps”.
And of course all the little sheeple Kosers are all over how stupid Freepers are...
Well, the August 5th that is mentioned on the certificate is 1961. The date of the actual signature is Feb 17, 1964.
Aren’t they so BRILLIANT!?!
WOW! You are DA MAN!!!
Botox Czar of the Bannna Republic Party.
Republic doesn’t bother me. Obviously it was a term that Kenyan’s had discussed and decided upon before Independence was declared.
Kenya was admitted to the UN on 12/16/1963. My guess that term republic was used for Kenya by other member states of the UN.
The Dec 1964 is purely administrative. Kenya was a separate and distinct country as of 12/16/1963 or else they would not have been admitted to the UN.
John
I don't believe this is accurate.
Give it a try, by all means. There are a bazillion genealogists on the internet, and they have all kinds of connections and resources.
You can find a way to a whole slew of middle-aged Kenyans in a few minutes, if you know the cyber-territory.
It’s just that when I jump into genealogical research, I tend to drown. :)
I'd rather be called a "Constitutionalist" since that's what we're standing by.Yes. I agree. I was just using the term "birther" to make my point; I wasn't using it in the derogatory manner in which the MSM uses it to ridicule those who have legitimate questions about Obama's refusal to disclose the records everybody else discloses as required.
bgill
A poster has put on this site images of newspaper clippings from 1963 that refer to the Republic of Kenya. I’ll try to find it. I’m not used to sifting through thousands of posts.
Did one of the janitors get a big screen tv around election time?
He wasn’t her son. You are thinking in Christian terms.
The grandmother in question was Sr’s father’s THIRD WIFE. Sr was born from the SECOND wife. So Obama’s “grandmother” (or Sr’s stepmother, 2nd mother, whatever) did WITNESS Sr’s birth. The birth by her sister wife.
HAHAHAHA! Priceless.
An anonymous person in fear for their life got it to Orly Taitz. Where it came from and why it ws ordered have been speculated at length, but their is no verifiable chain of custody since it was issued. Best bet is to check the book and page it identifies for the original record. That is what the motion is about, to authenticate it (or not).
Doesn’t bother me either — IF they put it on their official docs ten months before it was official.
I just need to see the proof.
How many people were born in Kenya in the year before 12/12/64? Gotta be a lot. Shouldn’t be hard to rustle up a few comparable docs.
I see your point. It could be that bureaucrats just jumped the gun and were using the new forms ahead of time. It would be helpful to see another certified true copy from February 1964 whose origins are not in dispute, and compare them. I thought that’s what WND said they had, but apparently that isn’t the case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.