Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
Yes, I had already seen it - someone sent it by email a while ago...but I enjoyed watching it again.
Early on in this whole affair, someone, I don’t recall who it was, reported rumors of three birth certificates for the child. The first one was supposed to be from the hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. The second birth certificate was supposed to be Canadian, and the third one being the Hawaiian birth certificate.
A hypothetical scenario explaining three birth certificates runs something like this:
Ann gives birth in Mombasa, Kenya, and the child receives a first birth certificate in the normal course of such affairs.
When Ann tries to arrange for her flight back to the United States with her newborn child, the airline insists she must have the necessary docuemnts for the entry of her newborn child into the United States before the ticket/s can be sold or used. Since the father is British Kenyan and she is not yet old enough at eighteen years of age to confer U.S. citizenship to the newborn child, the U.S. Consul says they cannot recognize the newborn as a U.S. citizen on her passport. Consequently, Ann can only take the child to another British Commonwealth nation without the child’s father and his passport.
Meanwhile, Madelyn Dunham has already arranged to file for a birth certificate in Hawaii on behalf of her daughter’s newborn child on the basis of Ann’s residence in Hawaii. This filing with the State of Hawaii is reported routinely to the local newspapers and included in the customary birth announcements, but with a false address because the parents did not actually live together.
Unable to enter the United States directly without the U.S. birth certificate in hand for the child, Ann takes a flight to the British Commonwealth country of Canada, with Vancouver, British Columbia being convieniently close to their former home and acquaintances in Seattle, Washington. After her arrival in Canada, Ann receives delivery of the U.S. birth certificate, or she obtains a third birth certificate from Canada as a delayed report of birth in a Commonwealth nation. If she obtained a Canadian birth certificate for the newborn, she used it to take advantage of the relaxed requirements for U.S. border crossing granted to Canadian citizens. Once she and the newborn are across the border and in the United States, Ann discards the Canadian birth certificate and uses the Hawaiian birth certificate Madelyn Dunham sends to her in Seattle for the child.
In such a scenario, a close look at the original Hawaiian birth certificate may reveal a report of a foreign birth registered in Hawaii, which would inevitably lead to questons about Barack Hussein Obama Jr.’s having any U.S. citizenship in addition to his native born British citizenship, and set off a whole new chain of events.
Makes sense to me. Makes a whole lot of sense.
I haven’t had the time to keep up with this issue. What is the latest word on the issue of whether Obama is a natural-born citizen?
Good post. Your explanation seems plausible.
Thanks for laying all that out. I got interested in the BC saga after the election, in fact not too long before this thread started. Therefore, I did not know about the 3 bc rumor. Your explanation is certainly plausible. I hope at some point we finally know. Thanks again.
Breast-feeding was not really “in” back in 1967. I decided to do it in 1969 with my first child but I felt like I was doing something very “radical” at the time. I didn’t know anyone else, even my hospital room-mate, who was doing it. Could this use of the word “nursing” be a bit of revisionism by Blake? I am not saying this to favor any theory that Anne was not his mother but just because I am skeptical of Blake’s using the term.
She didn’t actually say “Breast Feeding” she just “she got finished nursing” and the whole poop thing is troubling to me. If the baby was already three weeks old he had probably pooped a couple of dozen times by then. I raised three kids and I can tell you it didn’t take more than once to figure out what to do....
That part bothers me too. Most new mothers (most, not all) would not consider handing over their newborn to someone else to change unless it was an immediate family member who was familiar with the baby.
Does anyone have the video of the Susan Blake interview? Transcript? I’ve never seen it. Every time I click on a link that purports to be this interview, I get a screen that says “not available.”
Re: babies pooping. Supposedly the baby was only DAYS old when Blake saw “Stannie” in Seattle. She very well may have had someone else doing all the “icky” stuff regarding the baby up until that time — nurses at the hospital, for instance. “Stannie” had never baby sat as a teen and didn’t much like babies, so she had no experience. I could see her readily handing off the kid to anyone handy to take care of the distasteful part of caring for him.
Re: breast feeding. Although not universal, there was a big push to encourage moms to breast feed in the late 1950s and early 1960s. I breastfed my first in 1960 and all of the subsequent babies after that. Certainly there were moms who didn’t, but most of my friends nursed their babies, especially in the early weeks. The doctors used to tell you that even if you only breast fed your child for 3 weeks, it provided the baby with all kinds of immunities that they could not get anywhere else. And it was safer for any child born in a region that had a questionable water supply (i.e. where you had to boil the water and sterilize the bottles.)
Now, most of us breastfed unobtrusively — in a bedroom, or in a “restroom”, not out in public. Except, I remember on obnoxious woman who used to attend Berkeley, CA School Board meetings, sit in the front row, and nurse her baby right in front of the Board. No modesty blanket to cover him, or her, either. That was Berkeley!
At about the same time that O will be indoctrinating your childrens’ mushy little minds, his lawyers will be in a court room defending him against Alan Keyes and 200 Military men.
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2009/09/obamas-choice-of-september-8th-to.html
Here is a youtube of tthe interview w/Blake
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=advfrQEeIBY
Thanks for the link. I have to say that I find it hard to believe that any adult female would say in 1961 that “of all [Susan Blake’s] friends that Stanley had the brains and the grace to raise a multiracial child”. Most white females of that generation (my mother’s generation) would have been appalled at Stanley Ann’s choice. I think this memory of Susan Blake is a little bit of PC revisionism.
Of course I grew up in CA, not Seattle. Perhaps there was a different attitude in Mercer Island. After all there were relatively few blacks in Seattle at the time, or even later when I lived their in the 1980s. And Susan Blake’s mama apparantly saw nothing wrong with sending her daughter to a school (Mercer Island High) that allowed courses on Communism and Marxism — indeed a whole wing of the school devoted to it. That certainly would not have been tolerated in my home town in CA.
Thanks for the info and the reminder, MrLuigi. Bears watching. I’m sure that the scheduling of this classroom indoctrination is designed to keep Keyes’ lawsuit from being reported.
From Phil at TRSOL.
Obama is STILL a British Subject/Citizen http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=7165
And I read somewhere but can’t find it anymore, that Russia had held Obama when he visited while a senator on suspicion he was a British spy....
Now _that_ is a baby footprint! Definitely not cropped and blown up from Dr. Ang’Awa’s academic paper, which was my last remaining personal suspicion regarding the document.
It looks to me like there is a partial fingerprint, perhaps a thumbprint, on the document to the left of KANYADHIANG, perhaps left by the very person who inked baby Barack’s little foot! Wouldn’t verification of that print make for great forensic validation!
Shall we all stipulate to a whole range of ad hominem criticism directed at Orly and Lucas for various prior shortcomings to get that out of the way? As I said before, if Obama knows this is a valid document he may well resign this week.
Regarding Obama at Russian airport (2005):
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2005-08-29-senatorsrussiaapology_x.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.