Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elizabeth Smart Thread, 9/17/02 to ???

Posted on 09/16/2002 11:10:48 PM PDT by Utah Girl

Just thought I would start a new thread.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,0801,081-1,092 next last
To: GovernmentShrinker
They were looking for Elizabeth, not for the perpetrator, and they probably weren't at all sure that it wasn't some sort of sneaking out situation. Most of them probably didn't hear a lot of details before they ran out searching. If Elizabeth had been kidnapped to be raped, she would quite likely have still been around -- rape victims are often grabbed, taken to the nearest secluded spot, raped, and left there. Charlotte Hansen would still have been lying in her backyard 3-4 hours later, if someone hadn't heard her cries for help sooner

I have to disagree -- if it is indeed true that Ed Smart reported a possible kidnapping with weapon to the LE right away. Do you really think 40 to 50 neighbors would run out in the middle of the night to just look for a kid who "sneaked out" for a while?

There is no way to compare Liz's disappearance with the Hansen rape. A vastly different home scenario. If that was the M.O., it would have been far easier for a perpetrator to grab her while she was jogging, or after school, or a multitude of much easier venues.

1,041 posted on 09/25/2002 8:45:07 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1039 | View Replies]

To: freedox
3-4 hours after the fact, the armed gunman and his hostage could have been anywhere in the city or several surrounding counties. Were police supposed to issue an emergency order for everyone in a 150 mile radius to stay inside? Realistically, it would have been almost inconceivable that the kidnapper would still have been in the neighborhood, (unless it turned out to be sneaking out episode), but very conceivable that Elizabeth would still be there. Can you imagine if police made the searchers go home, and then found Elizabeth just a little too late?
1,042 posted on 09/25/2002 8:45:19 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1035 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
Also, she went because she thought she could trust the person she accompanied out of the house.
1,043 posted on 09/25/2002 8:47:38 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1041 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
The neighbors would run out to help look without knowing all the details, and hoping it was a sneaking out situation, but fearful it was a kidnapping/rape/murder.

And it doesn't appear that the perpetrator had much difficulty getting Elizabeth out of her home in the middle of the night. I'm not sure what you're implying is the big difference between the two cases -- the Hansen case was a family acquaintance bent on a vicious, apparently partly sexual, assault, who took the child from her bedroom in the middle of the night; there is reason to believe that the Smart case involved a family acquaintance, the perp definitely took the girl from her bedroom in the middle of the night, and we still don't know for what purpose.
1,044 posted on 09/25/2002 8:51:25 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1041 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Bedtime. 'Night all.

ZZZZzzzzzzz...

GS
1,045 posted on 09/25/2002 8:52:40 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1044 | View Replies]

To: freedox
How would you explain the police allowing people to continue to roam about when there were reports of an armed gunman?

You are assuming that 40 police officers converged on the sceen 12 minutes after the call and were in a position to cordon off the entire area and take full control of the neighborhood. Reality is quite different. A single officer arrived first. A second officer arrived shortly thereafter. They may very well have been the only officers on the scene for an hour or more. Having driven around the neighborhood, I can assure you that it would not have been possible for a small number of officers to control all the people in the neighborhood all the while looking for ES.

1,046 posted on 09/25/2002 8:52:46 PM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 972 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
It is true - in many Mormon homes. Unnecessary, external influences i.e. TV, phones, internet, are controlled and/or avoided whenever practical.

Apparently that didn't apply to computers. Seemed to be plenty of those among Smart family members. The total number LE took was 13, as I recall.

You are actually reading the posts before replying, right? Because there have been quite a few good ones to mull over in the last bit of time, and they answer some of these troublesome questions.

"Controlled and/or avoided whenever practical", so the computers were necessary, or thought to be, while an internal telephone system was not. The teachers at my local high school pretty much demand essays be done in MS Word.

1,047 posted on 09/25/2002 8:55:16 PM PDT by anatolfz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1037 | View Replies]

To: Neenah
This makes no sense ! The only answer has to be that the police knew there was no gunman, so the neighbors were not at risk of being shot, and Elizabeth was not at risk.

You are propagating a myth. Why would the police say there was a gun if there was not? What possible motive would LE have for that particular deception? Why are you assuming that all 40-50 neighbors knew there was a gun?

1,048 posted on 09/25/2002 8:57:59 PM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 980 | View Replies]

To: Neenah
You don't know that! I counted Ricci out from the beginning. Time line. Yes, he is a scum.....TIME LINE.

Your time line theory was bogus then and it's still bogus. Ricci could have easily driven to Price, where he used to hunt (where there is lots of gray mud and pine trees), stashed a body and returned in 3 hours and 30 minutes flat.

1,049 posted on 09/25/2002 9:02:11 PM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 982 | View Replies]

To: anatolfz
"Controlled and/or avoided whenever practical", so the computers were necessary, or thought to be, while an internal telephone system was not.

I believe the reports referred to both business and personal computers.

1,050 posted on 09/25/2002 9:03:25 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1047 | View Replies]

To: Jolly Green
Why would the police say there was a gun if there was not?

How could the LE possibly know for certain if there was a gun or not?

1,051 posted on 09/25/2002 9:05:18 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1048 | View Replies]

To: Jolly Green
Your time line theory was bogus then and it's still bogus. Ricci could have easily driven to Price, where he used to hunt (where there is lots of gray mud and pine trees), stashed a body and returned in 3 hours and 30 minutes flat.

One big word missing here, JG, WHY?

1,052 posted on 09/25/2002 9:07:07 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1049 | View Replies]

To: freedox
Utah Law:
76-5-302. Aggravated kidnapping.

(1) An actor commits aggravated kidnapping if the actor, in the course of committing unlawful detention or kidnapping:
(a) possesses, uses, or threatens to use a dangerous weapon as defined in Section 76-1-601; or
(b) acts with intent:
...
(iv) to inflict bodily injury on or to terrorize the victim or another;
......
(3) Aggravated kidnapping is a first degree felony punishable by imprisonment for an indeterminate term of not less than 6, 10, or 15 years and which may be for life. Imprisonment is mandatory in accordance with Section 76-3-406.


76-5-202. Aggravated murder.

(1) Criminal homicide constitutes aggravated murder if the actor intentionally or knowingly causes the death of another under any of the following circumstances:
...
aggravated arson, arson, aggravated burglary, burglary, aggravated kidnapping, kidnapping, or child kidnapping;
...
(2) Aggravated murder is a capital felony.
...
1,053 posted on 09/25/2002 9:12:23 PM PDT by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1018 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
It looks more and more like the "big search" was a big CYA.

Only to you.

1,054 posted on 09/25/2002 9:20:07 PM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1031 | View Replies]

To: Jolly Green
When was there time to have "fun" with her....wasn't that the idea, Ricci was a late blooming sex pervert?
1,055 posted on 09/25/2002 9:20:41 PM PDT by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1049 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
Apparently that didn't apply to computers. Seemed to be plenty of those among Smart family members. The total number LE took was 13, as I recall.

I did say "controlled".

1,056 posted on 09/25/2002 9:23:06 PM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1037 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
Why would the police say there was a gun if there was not?

How could the LE possibly know for certain if there was a gun or not?

The previous post is not asserting that the police knew anything of the kind; it is asking why they would make up this detail.

1,057 posted on 09/25/2002 9:26:10 PM PDT by anatolfz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1051 | View Replies]

To: anatolfz
The previous post is not asserting that the police knew anything of the kind;

Yes it is.... or it wouldn't have asked the following question.... it is asking why they would make up this detail.

1,058 posted on 09/25/2002 9:30:18 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1057 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
I think it means: they said there was a gun because that's what they had been told; of course they couldn't have known for sure, not having been present at the time; yet why should they lie about having been told there was a gun?
1,059 posted on 09/25/2002 9:40:37 PM PDT by anatolfz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1058 | View Replies]

To: anatolfz
I think it means: they said there was a gun because that's what they had been told; of course they couldn't have known for sure, not having been present at the time; yet why should they lie about having been told there was a gun?

Of course, had JG stated it in this fashion, there would have been no argument.

1,060 posted on 09/25/2002 9:54:13 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1059 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,0801,081-1,092 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson