0:00 Proximity of Stars
1:28 110 AU Range
5:00 HD 7977's Oort Cloud Disruption
10:08 Scholz's StarStars that Brushed Past the Solar System | 12:44
Territory | 122K subscribers | 408,226 views | August 8, 2026
Posted on 09/18/2026 9:57:56 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
0:00 Proximity of Stars
1:28 110 AU Range
5:00 HD 7977's Oort Cloud Disruption
10:08 Scholz's Star Stars that Brushed Past the Solar System | 12:44
Territory | 122K subscribers | 408,226 views | August 8, 2026
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Yes, but too many people read science fiction and start believing it as real. Some even hallucinate about capturing power from particles floating in space.
There are no aliens, there are no ghosts. Only physics of reality rules the enormous universe. I am 100% certain there are planets in universe with life. Only problem is universe is so vast and so sparsely occupied by solar systems, it is impossible to travel there. In our own milky way galaxy, the nearest next solar system is too far to reach. There is vast darkness of nothing in between.
LOL!
In other threads on FR, I have expressed skepticism on whether the Oort Cloud exists. As far as I know, we have never seen or photographed anything that is in an Oort Cloud. A comet nucleus that doesn’t yet have a lit-up tail would be nice. Now after reading this message, I’m wondering if we will ever have evidence for the Oort cloud.
Alrighty, tell us about it on Saturday.
Yup. It's a mathematical construct to explain (or just say, kludge) to make the Solar System formation construct work. AFAIK, AFAIC.
Wow, that’s impressive!!! 😆
That would explain why they’re coming for ours... 😁
We’ve got a keyword, “rogueplanets” (or maybe no ‘s’ on the end, or maybe both) about planets sans stars. I’d post it, but a five topic link post in #3 was deleted for no reason at all.
Immanuel Velikovsky was a polymath who wrote about his theories that in early human history there were cataclysmic celestial and planetary events. He was lambasted but since then much of the steady-state views held by his opponents have been proven wrong
Any comments on my Velikovsky reference?
Thanks! The Catastrophism ping list began life as an informal and stealth version of a Velikovsky ping list, mostly because that notorious web troll Ted Holden had spent some years stinking up the place with his BS, under many multiple nicks (so many there's actually a skeptics webpage about just his FR nicks). However, the bulk of the pings (it's a low-volume list) pertain to catastrophism, rather than to the reconstruction of ancient history.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.