CIA and USAID

In 2008 Joe Biden was Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, with oversight jurisdiction of the U.S State Dept. Foreign Service and the passport office, along with and all foreign policy nominations etc.

In 2008 John Brennan was working for the Obama campaign when someone from his outside government group, The Analysis Corporation, “hacked” into the state dept database to access the passport files and State Dept records of Barack Obama.

John O. Brennan, Obama’s then top terrorism and intelligence adviser, was the owner of The Analysis Corp. The company was cited in March 2008 for penetrating the files of presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and John McCain in the State Department’s passport office.

At the time of the breach, John Brennan was working as an unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign. After the breach was revealed by the Washington Times, Brennan stated:

“This individual’s actions were taken without the knowledge or direction of anyone at The Analysis Corp. and are wholly inconsistent with our professional and ethical standards,” Brennan’s company said in a statement sent to reporters after the passport breach was made public. (link)

The Washington Times Reported – Passport application data includes such details as date and place of birth, e-mail address, mailing address, Social Security number, former names and travel plans. Mr. Obama was born in Honolulu in 1961 to a Kenyan father and American mother. He lived in Jakarta, Indonesia, from age six to 10.

Computer-monitoring equipment detected the activities by the three employees on Jan. 9, Feb. 21 and March 14, triggering alarms in each case, Mr. McCormack said. Mr. McCormack said the officials accessed Mr. Obama’s records “without a need to do so.”

“In each case, we immediately contacted our contractors, their employer, and two were fired and one was disciplined,” he said. (link)

But it is important to remember EXACTLY what Brennan’s background was before the State Department breach. Brennan spent 25 years working for the CIA prior to the security breach:

Mr. Brennan spent most of his C.I.A. career as an analyst, but during the 1990s served a tour as the chief of the station in Saudi Arabia. From 1999 to early 2001, he was chief of staff to George J. Tenet, the director of central intelligence, as the position was then called. At the end of his CIA. service, in 2004 and 2005, Mr. Brennan set up what is now the counterterrorism center. (link)

Yet, people would have us believe, after 25 years within the CIA, and after being the Chief of Staff to the Director, and after being the person who set up the counter terrorism center, and after being the CIA approved contractor for the State dept., well, John Brennan just didn’t know that someone from his firm was penetrating the passport files within the State Dept. on three occasions in Jan and Feb 2008 to look at information of the candidate who he was specifically working for.

After the initial inquiry, federal investigators maintained that the target of the illegal activity was Senator Barack Obama’s passport file. It does not take a stretch to come to the conclusion this was for the sole purpose of cleansing records of information that would jeopardize Obama’s candidacy. As many people speculated at the time, the breach of the passport records of the other candidates was merely to create confusion.

Brennan was, at the time, an unpaid advisor working with Obama’s campaign. Passport files include an applicant’s name, gender, social security number, date and place of birth, and passport number. Additional information may include birth certificates, naturalization certificates, or oaths of allegiance for U.S. born persons who adopted the citizenship of a foreign country as minors.

It is important to remember the oversight agency that would be investigating the breach – The Senate Foreign Relations Committee oversees the State Department.

At the time Senator Joe Biden was the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee when the breach would be investigated.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice phoned Obama and personally apologized for the breach. “I told him that I myself would be very disturbed if I learned that somebody had looked into my passport file,” Rice told reporters. She phoned Clinton and McCain and offered similar apologies.

Following the breach, State Department managers met with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph Biden, whose committee has oversight over the Foreign Service and the passport office. (link)

State Department employee, Lieutenant Quarles Harris, Jr. who had the passport access, apparently was the guy who penetrated the database and scrubbed the records. Harris was killed – April 18th, 2008.

Yes, Lieutenant Harris decided to cooperate with the FBI who were investigating the break-in. Soon after his cooperation became a matter of record, his body was discovered in his parked car; he had been shot twice in the head, likely a “suicide”.

Last point. In mid-February 2010, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs alerted WH reporters that certain questions about Obama’s job with Business International Corporation (BIC) would not be subject to discussion. BIC was well known in Washington DC to be a front company for the CIA; hence, many speculated the State Department passport records were scrubbed to erase any potential mention of Obama’s CIA activities and his personal information. You decide.

If you take a close look at it, you realize that seemingly every function of the USAID as an institution came from the CIA. In essence, USAID was the operational cover for the CIA. The CIA seemingly created the mechanics of USAID for CIA purposes.

Now, once you look at USAID as an outreach arm of the CIA, then suddenly everything USAID partnered with can realistically be looked at -at the very least questioned- as a CIA operation working with joint partners for CIA intentions.

The recent story of USAID funding The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which in turn was funding KKK ops, is just one example. In actuality, with the nature of the relationship now being spotlighted, was the CIA directing activity and funding KKK ops? If so the implications are remarkable.

When we transition our thinking to accept much of the USAID activity was a CIA operation, it completely changes things. That shift in review, also reconciles things. Additionally, it is worth noting that Barack Obama’s mom worked for USAID.

The Clinton Foundation had a partnership with USAID. Ergo, essentially Bill and Hillary were partnered with the CIA. Now, does the lack of accountability for “Clinton Cash” or the pay-to-play make sense?

The Anthony Weiner/Huma Abedin laptop. The Awan Brothers. The Hunter Biden laptop, labeled as “Russian Disinformation” by former Acting CIA Director Mike Morrell and others.

USAID Administrator Samantha Power traveling Europe organizing political movements inside European and non-European countries. Well, that can now become the CIA organizing ‘leftist’ political groups, when you accept CIA as the chicken and USAID as the egg.

The entire analysis of how our govt is structured completely changes under the perspective that CIA operations have been much more deeply enmeshed than previously accepted. George H.W. Bush was a former CIA Director.

The Vice Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Marco Rubio, a long time Gang of Eight member, becomes the U.S. Secretary of State.

Concurrently, the Directorate of Analysis inside the CIA, the office that connects the NSA to the CIA, is removed from inside the CIA and put under the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. The heads of the Directorate of Analysis are removed and input feeding officials lose their security clearances.

At the same time, the ODNI then replaces the CIA as the principal director to assemble the President’s Daily Intelligence Brief (PDB).

Put these actions together: the political manipulation of the CIA analysis desk is now confronted. ✔️ The outcome equities of the CIA are fact-checked and confronted (PDB)✔️…. and the biggest move, the USAID operation that is run by the CIA to influence both foreign and domestic government operations is dissolved. ✔

However, that said, we must remember these are generational CIA constructs, legacy networks with the ability to adapt, shrink and/or expand their muscle memory depending on the objectives of who is watching them.

Then overlay the 5-eyes aspect that supports the foundational CIA operation, and what we get is a likelihood that even if the domestic CIA is brought to heel, the U.K (GCHQ), Canada, Australia and EU alliance part can still operate on the original framework.

Now think about Prime Minister Mark Carney’s recent opposition, his words and network to whom he is speaking. Then President Obama and Mark Carney assemble. Again, does that shift in perspective change the way these events look?

It certainly does seem that all roads, historic, recent and even generational; along with almost all significant political events and the political figures within them (Bush I, Clinton, Bush II, Obama); have some direct connection that leads back to Langley, Virginia.

Robert DeLong wrote: “Oh, okay. I think it’s it’s only compelling for one with critical thinking skills, because they are indeed legitimate conspiracies. But stick with your stupidity, believing that there are nbo consipacies, and that all are just riudculous theories. It shows you are still controlled by the brainwashing that has been happening in this countrry for decades now. Perhaps you need to start aplying critical thought, and then even you will agree that there are indeed legitmate conspiracies.”

If you used your critical thinking skills you would recognize that there was no evidence supplied in this article to support the claim that hackers scrubbed Obama’s passport application.

If you used your critical thinking skills you would realize that such an attempt was doomed to failure. Sure, you could modify the current file, but, and this is critical, you would realize that would be insufficient because that entire database is backed up on a daily/weekly basis. The backup files would still contain the information the scrubbers would be trying to erase/change. In effect, unless you can access and change all the backups, this effort is futile.

There is a difference between conspiracies and conspiracy theories. The theories are just that, theories with little or no substance.

"Mr. Obama was born in Honolulu in 1961 to a Kenyan father and American mother."

Both the Certificate of Birth and Long Form Birth Certificates (LFBC) documents claiming that Barry was born in Honolulu have conclusively been shown to be fraudulent forgeries.

The three birth-data-affirming Letters of Verification for Barry are all invalid, as they don't conform with from Hawaii's Administrative Rules for legally-valid, official documents, paragraph 11-1-2. All three are improperly stamped, sealed and/or signed and Director "Loretta Fuddy's" signature is missing from all three. As a result, they each have no more worth for legal purposes than a 1960's Bazooka Bubble Gum comic.

Upon Lolo Soetoro's marriage to Stanley Ann Dunham 3/15/1965, Hawaii Administrative Rules would have issued a new birth certificate showing the last name Soetoro therein. The old certificate with the original birth name by Administrative Rules would have been invalidated, put under seal, only allowed to be disclosed via court order, of which no valid record has been found. Similarly, Barry's Indonesian school records made no mention of an Obama surname, which tends toward showing that Indonesian law considered Barry to be Soetoro's adoptive son.

By 4/27/11, when the forged and fraudulent birth certificate was introduced to the White House Press Corps by C_A-connected White House Counsel Robert F. Bauer, first Chairman (for 35 years) of Perkins Coie, headquartered in Seattle, nowhere was mentioned the surname Soetoro, or a court order to alter and release a supposed "original" LFBC.

To conform to Hawaii's Administrative Rules there, should have been ALTERED and LATE flags on what might have been an "original" LFBC. If the WH Counsel team removed such flags (that knowing a bit about the persnickety Hawaii Department of Health Registrar at the time, Alvin T. Onaka, one should tend to believe), that would manifest just one more layer of invalidity to Barry's BC documents as they've been disclosed heretofore.

So the assaniation of JFK wass not a conspiracy? Where is the evidence that the actual shooter was captured. You believe that Bidenactually received 81 million votes? Prove that. Are you also saying that Donlad John Trump conspired with Russia's Putin to steal the 2016 election. There is no evidence of any such thing yet the Democrats keep asking people in Congressional hearing,;d did Biden win the election.

Grow up, it's extremely difficult to find the evidence with regards to conspiracies.

Again, I said what was presented was compelling, do you not understand what copmpelling means?

How do yyou know that what was presented is not the reality. Prove that it is just a conspuiracy theory, and not a bonafide conspiracy. As I said, conspiracies ae often devoid of evidence

Prove to me that Joe Biden won the 2020 electoion. He was awarded the election, but there is no evidence that you can point to that proves that he won the 2020 election, and that the 2020 election wasm't stolen.

The press, and even the courts, along with the Republican P along with many others actors conspired to stead the election in 2020.

Wan't to hear some compelling evidence that helps make the case for a stolen election.

They claimed thatDerek Chauvin killed George Floyd, even though the corners stated that George Floyd was killed by the drugs he had consumed.

THe press reported that the riots that followed across the country, were most peaceful, which was a bald-faced lie.

At the beginning fo 202 the Covid-19 virus got loose from the Whuhan Lab in China, that Fauci claimed was not the result ofgain-of-function research. Fauci even denied that it came from the wehuan Lab, instead he clained that it was came from an animal that jumped to a human. All lies These were not mistakes, they were intentional lies.

I forget how many cases Trump took to court that actually got heard, it wasn't many,but he won all of those cases. All other court cases were thorwn for various reasons, most of which were BS reasons. Such as no standing.

Due to the Cond-19virus, elections were changed in all blue states, not by the legislatures, buty by courts, who had no standing themselves in allowing that to happen.

Then they impeached Trump claiming that he started an insurrection at the Capitol, because he said fight like hell to have your voice heard. A figure of speech, but he also said that you must fight without violence

It is way past time for people like you to wake up, or you will find that the conspiracy to take down this nation, by both internal & external players will be succeed.

Or is that just another conspiracy theory in your mind?

Robert DeLong wrote: “How do you know that what was presented is not the reality. Prove that it is just conspiracy theory, and not a bonafide conspiracy.”

I know that the alleged hacking of Obama’s passport file didn’t happen because such an act would be futile accomplishing nothing since the backup files would contain the original data. Without this ‘hack’, the whole article collapses.

Robert DeLong wrote: “Again, I said what was presented was compelling, do you not understand what compelling means?”

Evidently you do not understand the meaning of compelling since without the ‘hack’ there is no compulsion.

Robert DeLong wrote: “As I said, conspiracies ae often devoid of evidence.”

Which is why conspiracies without evidence are little more than an amusing way to pass the time.

So, are you a worker for the State Department, and in a high position?

Irrelevant and impaterial, because you are wrong:

From NPR: I pulled it from a liberal source, so that you can't claim that I am cherry picking from some right-wing cospiracy site. The State Department yesterday called the breach "imprudent curiosity" and a clear violation of Department policy.

That my friend is what a total lack of evidence looks like. They provided a conclusion but provided no evidence as to why or how that conculsion was created, but was obviopusly included to create an impression, period. That impression is ofrc ourse, nothing to see here folks, move along now like good little sheep.

Hour Two: Obama's Passport Files Breached

You didn't even bother to check to make suere that your response was even remotely correct, I guess.

Evidently you do not understand the meaning of compelling since without the ‘hack’ there is no compulsion.

I see thehe stupidity within runs far & deep:

compelling - adjective
1. requiring urgent attention
2. forceful

Using the first definition means that it needs futher investigatioon, and thgus it becomes compelling to detrermine if the hacks actually took place, which is what this article provoked, dut for you, because you are so smart, you felt that you didn't have to do any further investigation. For had you done so, you wouldn't have responded incorrectly. Because for you it wasn't forceful enough in your mind to convinced you that itis anything more than just another conspiracy theory. That's because you do not want to believe it, and therefore, it needed no more of your precious time.

The hack ddid happen. Three imes in fact. The unauthorized accesses occurred on January 9, February 21, and March 14 of 2008.

The data would have been there in complete detail stating where Obama had been out of this country on his passport records fr officials to see where Obama had been. These records are normally accessible only to authorized government officials. If not, then there would be no reason for the files to even exist in the first place. But you are a know-it-all, that in reality knows nothing, but sure thinks they do, and want t try to intimidate others with the knowledge that he projects to possess.

Which is why conspiracies without evidence are little more than an amusing way to pass the time.

No, that is just proof that you are indeed an uninformed person, or you are a lazy brainwashed useful idiot.

Sure, someone looked at the file but that is far from a compelling argument that the file was modified, as claimed in the original article, to remove any evidence that Obama was not born in the US.

No, had it been limited to one look, you might be correct, but why three times? That is what makes it compelling. What records do the passport records link to? Were these people finding information as they went along or perhaps were told to look into further?

Can you explain what recortds may or may not e linked to the passport records? Can you even explain why three \ ventires into the passport records?

Again, you are basing that totally upon what the State Department itself has statesd.. Perhaps we need to have friendlies look into taking an audit of all government records of Barak Obama opassport & otyher relevant records before & after breach to see where discrepancoes may exist. That make\s for the compelling aspect, not that he said it is not a stretch that the purpose was for altering records, for that is just his way of saying that an audit needs to be done, because the same passport records were accessed not once, not even twice, but three consecutive times. For what purppse? Notice that he did not say that it was digfinitvely to change records. But that is what you read into his statement. Now you are claiming that his statement was false, when there was nothing false in it. That is you making the case that whis wors were stated in definitive terms, when that is not the reality at all.

Even if the file was changed, the backup files would remain unchanged. At that point the entire conspiracy theory collapses.

Here you are making the assumption that the backup files were examined. Do you have any proof that was what hapened? None of the articles I have read stated that backup files were examined to see if changes were made.

So, that is what the article is saying. Let there be a complete examination to see if there was any changing of data that took place.

But again, had you been precise as to what you found incorrect, I could have solved this error you made, instead of claiminf that this is nothing more than a conspiracy theory.

He provded compelling information to make the case that a through audit od the data needs to take place, by examing records that currently exist on the files for Barak Obama, and backup files previous to the illegal access of the files of Barak Obama.

Again, critical thinking skills are not your strong suit at all. Instead, you accept whatever you are told, and anything not conforming to your limited thought process, is immediately labeled by you as being nothing more than conspiracy theory without need to examine any further.

That explains why you cannnot see this article as compelling.

Is it not worthy to mentyion a conspiracy theory? I think it is, because there may be a real conspiracy behind it. Time to find out is my take on the articel.

When you started out you seem to disbelieve that an intrusion into Obama's passport records even existed.

I'm a former computer programmer, I know first hand how easy it is to hide data, and also how backdoors can be slipped into existing code to go to other places that do not readily show up. It is only after these extraneous codings are uncovered does the picture become more clear. If it happens in the private sector you can almost assuredly believe that it happens within city, state, and federal records as well.

Look no further than the records found by the FBI within its own buiilding, that implicate the Obama administration of hiding data, which had been marked for destruction, but apparently someone who is friendly to this nation preserved that information.

This is how copiracies remain hidden,along with people like you who are disinterested in going the extra mile to determine if the conspiracy theory has merit to be examined further to see if the conspiracy is real..

Robert DeLong wrote: “For what purppse? Notice that he did not say that it was digfinitvely to change records. But that is you read into his statement.”

From the article: “After the initial inquiry, federal investigators maintained that the target of the illegal activity was Senator Barack Obama’s passport file. It does not take a stretch to come to the conclusion this was for the sole purpose of cleansing records of information that would jeopardize Obama’s candidacy. As many people speculated at the time, the breach of the passport records of the other candidates was merely to create confusion.”

The entire article was based up “a stretch”. The author bases the entire article on a ‘stretch’ if the author’s imagination. That’s the problem with most conspiracy theories, their based upon someone’s imagination of nefarious plot. And, you allow yourself to be suckered in because someone, some where, imagined something.

I already said thatthe statement verbiage was it doesn't take a stretch.

I also went into hpow you are mistaking his words, because you chose that to mean, he is being conclusive that what he says is the truth. But you are providing that because by that he means, prove me wrong with my supposition. In other words, let;'s look into the entire record history of Oama to see what really transpired , because it once accessed once, or even twice, but three times.

I furrhter asked you why they went there three times, which you totally ignored. because even you cannot explain that He didn't say that the goal was definitively to change records. Unfortunately you are a dishonest person who loves to play games. Sorry, you are not up to the task.

Remember the Senator Joe McCarthy that said the communists were infiltrating our nations educational system destroying our future leaders?

He was stated as being an irrational conspiratist, who was spreading conspiracy theories. He as ignored, and now we see that he was correct. That conspiyacy was ongoing for what 75 years, befor that to become more than evident as we see the SDA winning elections, because the young do not even know the histry.

It was people like you who have been brainwashed to reject conspiracies, and now you are doing that same thing with this article.

When you quote me, do it fullty, because you conviently leave outrt the vast majority of what I say hoping that people only read what you provide instead of looking back at what I said in its entirety.

Why are you so adamantly fighting this, are you afraid to have a fiull audit of the records on Obama. You must be one of those who hold Obama on a messianic pedestal.

I'm sorry, you are indeed a useful idiot.

Had he added one word, would you have still takenr your current interpretation?

Had he said it is not a strtch of possibilities, because that is my take on him stating it is not a stretch, but even you have to admit that he didn't say anything that provides yyou proof that he thinks this is a conclusion that he buys as being definitive.

So, you can't state that it is a conspiray theory.

It's a theory, and he obviously thinks it deserves to examine further, which incvludes looking back to the backup files to see if there are differences found.

obviously, he does not have acces to do so, thus there is no way he can provide the evidence.

If you looked at that reality, you would instantly see that he is merely raising the possibilty that the same record was accessed three times might be the explanation for doing so, was to alter records.

That is compelling thought, because it still needs to be examined to rpovide the actual proof that you desire.

At this moment it is a conspiracy theory.but that doesn't mean that it should be dismissed & ignored, as you ignoratnly claim is to be. Truth is that you have no cluse if his theory is what happened or didn't happen, because it needs to be examined much closer than it has beenso far.

We know that the records for his passport were accessed illegally, and that Condie Rice offered her apologies. So, using the word hack, is not the compelling information he brought forth

You just refuse to accept that he provided compelling reason to investifate that act further.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.