I also went into hpow you are mistaking his words, because you chose that to mean, he is being conclusive that what he says is the truth. But you are providing that because by that he means, prove me wrong with my supposition. In other words, let;'s look into the entire record history of Oama to see what really transpired , because it once accessed once, or even twice, but three times.
I furrhter asked you why they went there three times, which you totally ignored. because even you cannot explain that He didn't say that the goal was definitively to change records. Unfortunately you are a dishonest person who loves to play games. Sorry, you are not up to the task.
Remember the Senator Joe McCarthy that said the communists were infiltrating our nations educational system destroying our future leaders?
He was stated as being an irrational conspiratist, who was spreading conspiracy theories. He as ignored, and now we see that he was correct. That conspiyacy was ongoing for what 75 years, befor that to become more than evident as we see the SDA winning elections, because the young do not even know the histry.
It was people like you who have been brainwashed to reject conspiracies, and now you are doing that same thing with this article.
When you quote me, do it fullty, because you conviently leave outrt the vast majority of what I say hoping that people only read what you provide instead of looking back at what I said in its entirety.
Why are you so adamantly fighting this, are you afraid to have a fiull audit of the records on Obama. You must be one of those who hold Obama on a messianic pedestal.
I'm sorry, you are indeed a useful idiot.
Robert DeLong wrote: “Why are you so adamantly fighting this, are you afraid to have a fiull audit of the records on Obama. You must be one of those who hold Obama on a messianic pedestal.”
There you go again imagining things that aren’t there. Pointing out the faulty logic in an article that is based upon imagination instead of facts isn’t the same thing as thinking Obama is a saint.
Without the ‘hack’ to change Obama’s passport records is the basis of this article. Without it, the rest is nothing but aimless speculation. To some, the lack of evidence is why it is so ‘compelling’.