Replies

Robert DeLong wrote: “While the conclusion is not definative, itis hardly a stretch and actually falls into the compelling category, for there were several examples presented that made it compelling, not a stretch at all, as you claim it to be.”

It’s only compelling if one is attracted to conspiracy theories and is predisposed to believe this regardless of the lack of supporting evidence.

Oh, okay. I think it's it's only compelling for one with critical thinking skills, because they are indeed legitimate conspiracies. But stick with your stupidity, believing that there are nbo consipacies, and that all are just riudculous theories. It shows you are still controlled by the brainwashing that has been happening in this countrry for decades now. Perhaps you need to start aplying critical thought, and then even you will agree that there are indeed legitmate conspiracies.

Notice I didn't actually say it was a valid conclusion, but that it was compelling. Apparently you can't understand the difference, because you automatically deny that there are real conspircaies that take place more often then you can even comprehend.

None so blind as those who refuse to see.