So, are you a worker for the State Department, and in a high position?
Irrelevant and impaterial, because you are wrong:
From NPR: I pulled it from a liberal source, so that you can't claim that I am cherry picking from some right-wing cospiracy site. The State Department yesterday called the breach "imprudent curiosity" and a clear violation of Department policy.
That my friend is what a total lack of evidence looks like. They provided a conclusion but provided no evidence as to why or how that conculsion was created, but was obviopusly included to create an impression, period. That impression is ofrc ourse, nothing to see here folks, move along now like good little sheep.
Hour Two: Obama's Passport Files Breached
You didn't even bother to check to make suere that your response was even remotely correct, I guess.
Evidently you do not understand the meaning of compelling since without the ‘hack’ there is no compulsion.
I see thehe stupidity within runs far & deep:
compelling - adjective
1. requiring urgent attention
2. forceful
Using the first definition means that it needs futher investigatioon, and thgus it becomes compelling to detrermine if the hacks actually took place, which is what this article provoked, dut for you, because you are so smart, you felt that you didn't have to do any further investigation. For had you done so, you wouldn't have responded incorrectly. Because for you it wasn't forceful enough in your mind to convinced you that itis anything more than just another conspiracy theory. That's because you do not want to believe it, and therefore, it needed no more of your precious time.
The hack ddid happen. Three imes in fact. The unauthorized accesses occurred on January 9, February 21, and March 14 of 2008.
The data would have been there in complete detail stating where Obama had been out of this country on his passport records fr officials to see where Obama had been. These records are normally accessible only to authorized government officials. If not, then there would be no reason for the files to even exist in the first place. But you are a know-it-all, that in reality knows nothing, but sure thinks they do, and want t try to intimidate others with the knowledge that he projects to possess.
Which is why conspiracies without evidence are little more than an amusing way to pass the time.
No, that is just proof that you are indeed an uninformed person, or you are a lazy brainwashed useful idiot.
Robert DeLong wrote: “The hack ddid happen. Three imes in fact. The unauthorized accesses occurred on January 9, February 21, and March 14 of 2008.”
Sure, someone looked at the file but that is far from a compelling argument that the file was modified, as claimed in the original article, to remove any evidence that Obama was not born in the US.
Even if the file was changed, the backup files would remain unchanged. At that point the entire conspiracy theory collapses.