Scientist finds evidence of 'alien DNA' in humans

Daily Mail UK ^ | October 06, 2025 | ROB WAUGH

[Red Badger]

Scientists claim to have found evidence of alien genetic manipulation in human DNA, with large sections of genes seemingly 'inserted' into people, potentially affecting millions of humans.

If confirmed, the discovery could fundamentally alter our understanding of human evolution and the future of the human race, said lead researcher Dr Max Rempel, the founder and chief executive of the DNA Resonance Research Foundation.

The study, which has not yet undergone peer review, analyzed DNA from both ordinary people and self-reported alien abductees.

In an examination of 581 complete families from the 1,000 Genomes Project, Rempel found 'large sequences' of DNA in 11 families that appeared to match neither parent.

These anomalies include a cluster of 348 non-parental genetic variants, some of which were from children born before 1990, ruling out human gene-editing technologies such as CRISPR, which only emerged in 2013.

Rempel cautioned that his findings are preliminary and require more rigorous analysis.

'No conclusive evidence yet, because we need better datasets, which are available only on approval. That takes time and effort,' he said.

Nevertheless, he believes the implications could be staggering. 'Humanity may be undergoing genetic transformation. If confirmed, it could be possible to detect which humans carry alien DNA, essentially identifying hybrids,' he explained.

The researcher's hypothesis resonates with fringe theories long circulating among UFO enthusiasts and conspiracy theorists.

Some have suggested that alleged alien-human hybrids exist, citing examples such as the so-called Nazca mummies, which purportedly contain both human and alien DNA.

Rempel's findings, while not conclusive, could lend scientific credence to these theories if validated. However, both Nasa and the US Pentagon have admitted that alien life does not exist.

[Just mythoughts]

Genesis 3:15
15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

I just love it when the ignorant demonstrate their stupidity ... Since when does a snake have ‘seed’?????? Parable of the FIG tree!!!!!

[RoosterRedux]

Jude 6–7 and 2 Peter 2:4–5 actually are referring back to the same event described in Genesis 6 (and elaborated in 1 Enoch)—the angelic rebellion that led to sexual transgression and the Flood.

Both passages link angelic sin to “going after strange flesh,” using the Sodom comparison as a type of illicit union, not as the same event. Early Church Fathers such as Tertullian, Justin Martyr, and Lactantius understood it this way, and modern scholars like Michael Heiser have shown that bene ha’elohim (“sons of God”) in Genesis 6 always refers to divine beings, never humans.

You don’t have to accept that interpretation, but it isn’t a modern invention—it’s the oldest and most consistent reading of the text.