Posted on 09/10/2025 1:43:26 PM PDT by RandFan
@RedWave_Press
Witness claims he knew the man police arrested for allegedly sh00ting Charlie Kirk: “And I turn and look and they’re arresting a guy of [person’s name]. Yeah, I know the guy. I don’t think he did. I think they arrested the wrong guy. I think whoever did it was a good sh00ter, a sharp sh00ter. It was one sh0t... We need to find out who did this.”
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
“> Whoever killed Charlie will be view as a hero by a significant portion of our population. <”
The sacrificial lamb is already room temperature.
The weapon is in place.
Photos staged and taken.
The actual shooter is long gone.
The community agitators/leaders are calling out “Chicks up front” just like their psuedo heroes of the ‘60s.
The real leaders are behind well protected walls of money and power and prepared to watch the coming entertainment.
This could be the Fort Sumpter moment many have anticipated.
Check for someone missing at the local FBI office.
He’s gone, every outlet is saying thie same thing. Nice if you to hope for his recovery, but he is gone.
Well, here's hoping and praying they just did more damage to their chances in the elections that ANYTHING Charlie Kirk could ever have said.
I wonder if the left truly understood the reaction they'd get from this incident.
“ MSNBC says it’s probably a supporter who was shooting their gun in celebration. I am so sick of the left.”
————
I sincerely hope that the FCC refuses to renew that crappy networks right to broadcast. It is one thing to spread your opinion around, everyone and every organization has a right to do that. But it is quite another to spread outright falsehood with the intention of deceiving people.
We need a hundred Charlie Kirks doing open mic debates on every campus.
“I AM CHARLIE KIRK!”
the fascist left murders someone who disagrees with them again.
He died.
fascist left refuses to execute murderers, but is ok with the murder of Ashley Babbitt and now Charlie Kirk
“ It was a hypersonic crack and not a bang, meaning it was probably a rifle.”
——————
In keeping with Charlie Kirk’s long-stated preference, I will do my best to remain completely factual. I did not hear any recording that had enough detail about the sound of the gunshot for me to make any judgment on what you stated. However, I did hear a report from Real America’s Voice that police said that they do not have the shooter in custody, and that many people connected with the investigation are stating that it was a rifle shot. I will hazard a guess that one of two things, perhaps both, occurred: either a rifle bullet was found in his body or very near to where he was shot, and/or a shell casing was found somewhere at the venue.
To be honest, it makes a lot of sense, given how much blood he lost and the precision of the shot. Generally speaking, most people in the heat of passion cannot hold a handgun well enough to make that accurate of a shot except by happenstance, as they would simply be shaking too much. It doesn’t mean that they cannot get off a lethal shot, but this one hit Charlie exactly where it would cause him to bleed the most, other than a direct headshot (and a neck shot is generally easier since the head tends to move around a lot more - just look at the assassination attempt on Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania).
Charlie is dead.
Snipers don't use handguns.
Cable networks don’t need FCC licenses, they don’t use the airwaves to broadcast
>> In time we will know the facts and right now there’s no one anywhere who does.
OK.
And if we never do know... if the assassin slips away with the help of friendly parties in the Utah academic/government/law enforcement/left and is never caught...
this event becomes a template for how the pissed-off righteous extract tenfold justice. Cold, careful, well-planned, calculated justice.
Now there's an understatement.
Admittedly, shots from 200 meters away in a public spot are not going to make rapid identification of the shooter a routine matter. But they should get him eventually.
To me, it is abundantly clear that if the shot did not come from the older guy who was initially dragged off, then it was a scoped rifle shooting from a much longer distance. Frankly, it is much more logical and practical to do that, as the distance involved would give the shooter at least a somewhat better chance of escaping. I would also hazard a guess that if a scoped rifle was used to assassinate him, the odds of a conspiracy go up manyfold.
THIS IS WAR!
My bet is the guy they apprehended was playing decoy to give the perp time to slip away.
The only thing out of his mouth was “I have the right to remain silent.”
Sounds like a plan, to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.