Posted on 05/28/2025 2:28:50 PM PDT by Miami Rebel
In a still-early look at the likely November gubernatorial matchup, Democrat Abigail Spanberger leads Republican Winsome Earle-Sears by 43%-26%, according to the Roanoke College Poll. The Institute for Policy and Opinion Research (IPOR) at Roanoke College interviewed 658 Virginia residents between May 12 and May 19, 2025. The survey has a weighted margin of error of 5.25%.
More than a quarter (28%) of registered voters are undecided, and 3% said they would vote for someone else. These results are within the margin of error of the February poll. Regarding favorable/unfavorable ratings, about one in five doesn’t know enough about either candidate to have an opinion about them.
Job Approval, Favorable/Unfavorable, and Directions of Virginia and Nation
For the first time in eight years of polling, a majority (51%) thinks things in Virginia have gotten off on the wrong track, while two-thirds (66%) say the same about the country. President Donald Trump’s job disapproval rating (65%) is the worst it has been, including during his first term, while his 31% approval rating is low, but not his worst. Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s job approval rating (46%) is his lowest and down seven points from November.
Youngkin’s unfavorable rating (44% favorable/50% unfavorable) is also his worst showing, while Trump’s is close to his most negative (33% favorable/64% unfavorable). Spanberger’s rating (41% favorable/40% unfavorable) is similar to November, while Earle-Sears’ numbers have fallen in that time (32% favorable/48% unfavorable), with about one-fifth of respondents not offering an opinion. Mark Warner, whose U.S. Senate seat is up for election in 2026, comes in at 51% favorable, about where he stood five years ago. While the Democratic Party is not seen in a positive light (51% unfavorable), the Republican Party fares even worse (63% unfavorable). All these questions show significant partisan differences (see topline).
Political Anxiety and Politics
The overall index of 89.41 is up 13 points since November 2024. While that increase is minimal, it masks significant changes within political parties. Democrats jumped from -10.39 in May 2024 to 101.77 in November 2024, and their current anxiety index stands at 153.35. During the same period, Republicans dropped from 166.59 (May) to 13.52 (November), and are now at -30.10. Political anxiety is closely tied to party control of the White House and Congress.
Most respondents trust the government in Washington to do what is right only sometimes (62%) or never (24%), but a slight majority (52%) thinks that ordinary citizens can influence the federal government. Most Virginians (62%) think their side has been losing more than winning on important issues. A plurality (43%) of those polled is dissatisfied with how the federal government is working, and 31% are angry, which is the highest measure of anger in the eight years we have been asking it. Half (50%) now think the country’s best years are behind us, but 48% think the best years lie ahead.
Democrats have become much more pessimistic about the federal government, while Republicans are more positive. The greatest party differences on the questions that comprise the index can be seen in “winning more than losing,” “dissatisfied/angry with how government is working,” and “best years ahead.” Those results can be found in the crosstabs at the conclusion of the topline.
A large majority (84%) of Virginians see the nation as divided regarding the important issues facing it. More than half (56%) think the federal government makes their life worse, as opposed to the 40% who think the government makes their life better.
Deficit/Debt
The Roanoke College Poll also examined perceptions of the national debt and annual deficit. A large majority of Virginians say they are very concerned (42%) or somewhat concerned (40%) about the deficit and debt. A majority thinks the deficit is a result of spending too much (61%) versus not raising enough money in taxes (34%).
Asked to make choices to address the issues, the largest group favors raising taxes for those making more than $400,000 annually (74%), but 82% oppose raising taxes for everyone. A large majority (71%) likewise oppose across-the-board spending cuts. More than half (56%) oppose cutting programs other than defense, Social Security, and Medicare; 55% oppose cutting defense; and 73% oppose significantly modifying Social Security and Medicare to save money. If forced to choose an option that would impact them or their family, 29% would prefer increased taxes, 28% picked fewer services, and 15% boldly chose both. More than a quarter (27%) picked neither because they think the debt and deficit aren’t that big of a problem.
Analysis
“Six months in a gubernatorial election season is an eternity in politics, but one would prefer to be ahead by 17 points,” said Dr. Harry Wilson, interim director for IPOR and professor emeritus of political science at Roanoke College. “More than a quarter of Virginians are undecided, and there is good news for both candidates. Spanberger is obviously leading at this point, and she leads among independents, but a large number of Republicans are undecided, and they will most likely end up voting for Earle-Sears. The favorable rating for Earle-Sears, however, should be cause for concern.”
“Both Trump and Youngkin are taking some hits in terms of job approval and favorable ratings. Most of that comes from Democrats and independents, but some Republicans have soured on both as well. That could be related to internal squabbles in the Republican Party, statewide and nationally, but we do not have data on that.”
“With regard to the deficit and debt, most see them as a problem, but not as many seem to be willing to pay the piper.”
Methodology
Interviewing for the Roanoke College Poll was conducted by the Institute for Policy and Opinion Research (IPOR) at Roanoke College in Salem, Virginia, between May 12 and May 19, 2025. A total of 658 completed interviews came from random telephone calls and texts to 384 Virginians, and 274 responses were drawn from a proprietary online panel of Virginians. Interviews were conducted in English. Cellphones constituted 39% of the completed phone and text to web interviews.
The phone sampling frame was provided by Marketing Systems Group with the landline sample generated by random digit phone numbers with area and exchange code coverage in proportion to the population density in Virginia; the cellular sampling frame was randomly divided so that half of the potential respondents would receive a text message with an invitation to complete the survey on their own before we would call them, and the other half would be called and interviewed over the phone by a live agent and sent a text message afterwards with an invitation if the respondent was not available when we called. Cint USA, Inc, facilitated the online panel with completion time and attention check questions used for quality control. IPOR regularly uses bootstrap analysis of post-survey results to control for quality within the blended frames.
Questions answered by the sample of 658 respondents are subject to a weighted error margin (including design effect) of plus or minus 5.25% at a confidence level of 95%. This means that in 95 out of 100 samples such as the one used here, the results should be at most 5.25 percentage points above or below the figure obtained by interviewing all Virginians with a home telephone or a cellphone. Where the results of subgroups are reported, the error margin is higher.
Quotas were used to ensure that different regions of the commonwealth were proportionately represented. The data were statistically weighted for gender, race and age. Weighting was done to match Virginia data in the 2023 one-year American Community Survey (ACS). The design effect was 1.994.
“...A total of 658 completed interviews came from
random telephone calls and texts to 384 Virginians,
and 274 responses were drawn from
a proprietary online panel of Virginians.
Interviews were conducted in English.
Cellphones constituted 39% of the completed
phone and text to web interviews...”
I deleted the ones I got.
I keep hearing the democrat party is all washed up, that they are in disarray, that they will be a permanent minority party. Uhh, yeah right. The main reason the democrats lost was Donald J. Trump. The same guy that republican party is refusing to support is the only reason for the victory in 2024. Kamala would’ve likely beat any other republican.
There’s no way ARL, ALX and FFX are going to vote Republican this go-round.
That’s a race between a leftist and a NeverTrump. Hard pass.
Clearly it’s not so out of whack as those numbers. But Sears will have a lot of trouble. This stupid off year election in VA is specifically tailored to make sure the GOP doesn’t win the governor’s race the year after a Republican wins the White House.
Ok I laughed. Out loud. NFW that happens. None.
So the leftist then?
Like deranged flea-bitten dogs, these Roanoke pollsters continue to live in an alternate universe...
My church is a big fan of sears but I don’t think she has a chance of winning.
she might pull some blacks in the tidewater but whatever she gains there—she’ll lose in the mountains. Otherwise the same dynamics holds—including republicans not coming out in the off year elections and then with Northern VA deciding the election for democrats.
thats conventional wisdom. If the race were held in 2026 imho things might be different —given what I think will be an economy on a tear.
VA and MD are the swamps States.
I could vote for a decent Conservative whether they liked Trump or not, if Spanberger was the alternative.
NJ is trending Red. Scott Presler has been doing great work, and we have a good chance of flipping the Governor l. VA is too tied to the swamp.
Youngkin(R) won the last gubernatorial election in VA.
Trump is trying to roote out the swamp. VA is it’s headquarters.
NJ is looking good though.
The problem in New Jersey is not the voters—they are getting better.
The problem is the Democrats who count the “votes” in the urban centers.
We will see.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.