We’re In A Black Hole Ping!....................
Can we still say “black hole” anymore?
Poppycrock!We’re in a computer simulation program. End of discussion.
So we could be in a universe inside a black hole that could be floating around another universe, that is also in a black hole that is in a another universe inside another black hole...
I need a drink.
The universe is, in the end, a beautiful array of mathematical equations. It does not exist as the space-time continuum we perceive. Attempting to describe it from our limited space-time continuum perspective is sort of laughable, but it’s all we’ve got.
And how is this jn any way verifiable, it’s not. So it is effectively just a guess. But because some people have letters after their name and they prefer to not believe in God this becomes a preferred explanation.
Also interesting how this aligns with Hindu cosmology, gee I wonder why?
“”But if the universe was indeed born rotating, it means that the existing theories about the cosmos are incomplete.””
Wow. What an understatement. :-) Theories about the cosmos will always be incomplete.
When it comes to origins of the universe, let’s face it - nobody has a clue what happened - even our best thinkers. But I suppose no scientist or theologian ever advanced his career by admitting that.
Just another example of science being racist.
Well, if camelduh had won........
Now to tell my bank the good news and get a new card.
No, but it’s in a time-warped gravitational anomaly drawn by the gravitational attraction of dark matter emanating from a white hole in an alternate universe in the multiverse in which time goes backwards. Plus it’s just a simulation in a video game being played in some supra universe.
Or some such nonsense.
So, in summary, the whites won’t let the others in, and the blacks won’t let the others out?
No we’re not stuck inside a black hole. Its the Matrix man...the Matrix!!
First of all, a 1/3 to 2/3 split is not an unexplainable statistical outlier. There could be any number of naturally occurring reasons for it besides just dismissing that close to 50% of galaxies have to spin opposite ways due to statistical predictability. For example, how do you know that 1/3 didn’t get reoriented axially? They may have stayed spinning the same way round their original axis, but began rotating or flipping as a whole in relation to the orientation of the other 2/3.
Secondly, why assume that the spin of the universe (or the proposed ‘black hole’) has to affect all matter the same way? Perhaps there are intrinsic properties about he formation of galaxies that determined how they were affected by the greater influence
The universe, in some ways, looks a lot like the inside of an atom or a cell. I suspect our entire known universe is located inside a membrane too far away to see.
Today’s new blackhole theory. Don’t get sucked in!
“...there are two primary possible explanations,” team leader Lior Shamir...said in a statement.”
No surprise Space.com ran with the wild “sci-fi movie” explanation.
Still a fun read, though. Thanks for posting.