First of all, a 1/3 to 2/3 split is not an unexplainable statistical outlier. There could be any number of naturally occurring reasons for it besides just dismissing that close to 50% of galaxies have to spin opposite ways due to statistical predictability. For example, how do you know that 1/3 didn’t get reoriented axially? They may have stayed spinning the same way round their original axis, but began rotating or flipping as a whole in relation to the orientation of the other 2/3.
Secondly, why assume that the spin of the universe (or the proposed ‘black hole’) has to affect all matter the same way? Perhaps there are intrinsic properties about he formation of galaxies that determined how they were affected by the greater influence
I came here to look for a reply like yours.
I agree