|
Posted on 01/31/2025 8:59:58 PM PST by ransomnote
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
An TEXAS addition to the US HOUSE is...🔥
Brandon Gill on the rise:
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1887992112911892528?t=NkQb5ma0w5YRFK5Zbo_VuA&s=09
The is a tsunami of news.
🤣 I got about 81
Exactly what it feels like.
Bkmk
In the first place, if Speaker Johnson gives this even a nod of attention he must be removed from the speakership; he is already on thin ice with me - no matter what Donald Trump may think of him.
Second, the Constitution outlines grounds for impeachment: Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors . . . Not liking a president or his policies is NOT grounds for impeachment. If POTUS cannot control corruption in the executive branch of the federal government then the office of president is unconstitutional!
ALSO: the media is reporting that the office of USAID cannot be shut down because it is 'Congressionally enshrined! That is meaningless and misleading. That executive department was established under executive order by Prez Jimmy Carter and is subject to orders of the office of the presidency. Congress has fed money into USAID, much of it for nefarious reasons; that does not give them sole jurisdiction over that prodigal department.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 02/01/2025 Vol.504, Q Day 2654, OldWarBaby wrote: This is not a good look for Flynn. Might explain why Trump doesn’t appear to be using him again?
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 02/01/2025 Vol.504, Q Day 2654, Axenolith wrote: Don’t discount purposeful placement of players on the inside of 1or more of these operations. A plan in the works for decades is going to have some moles and white hat insiders.
I am slowly coming to agree with OldWarBaby.
America's Future Inc. describes it's activities at the link.
https://www.americasfuture.net/our-mission/
None of their activities are bad or destructive as described. But none of them fit under the definitions of USAID activities.
I keep seeing USAID described in damaging reports as a 'slush fund used to further Dem objectives' and so I wonder 'What's Flynn's org doing there?' How did he get past the gate keepers, and why?
I don't see how being on the inside as a recipient of USAID would give Flynn an advantageous vantage point into its activities.
I think Flynn's defensiveness about his own involvement in Pegasus ruled him out of government office - by talking the way he did in the recording with Lin Wood, he probably gave Trump's detractors ammo to hammer the administration. If Flynn's actions re Pegasus were legitimate (it seems that the program will never be explained to the public-classified?), he shouldn't have asked Woods not to mention his involvment in the program; it just made him seem vulnerable to journalists, public opinion, critique etc. and likely to struggle in any confirmation hearing.
Pegasus is spyware developed by a private contractor for use by government agencies. The program infects a target’s phone and sends back data, including photos, messages, and audio / video recordings. Pegasus’ developer, an Israeli company called NSO Group, says that the software can’t be traced back to the government using it — a crucial feature for clandestine operations.
Note that early reports said that Flynn was either an advisor or on the board of the Mossad spyware program, Pegasus, that is pushed out to our cell phones no matter what we do. The MSM has jumped in and flooded the zone with their own portrayals of the Pegasus program, one which flatters them, so it often sounds quite different now.
The way Flynn responded to objections to his prayer at a Christian gathering was perplexing and divisive, and I thought revealed that he has his gifts, but he wasn't 'ideal,' as I previously thought him to be, for Trump's Vice President.
He may yet play a formal roll in the administration, but it looks like his willingness to name names despite threats was his original, critical contribution. Q4025 says Flynn "knows where the bodies are buried" and asks if Flynn will be in Trump's adminstration V2. He was persecuted for his knowledge. He's held up under Deep State pressure.
Trump has spoken of his appreciation for Flynn, and I've wondered if Trump's remarks indicate Flynn will take center stage exposing some of the corruption he witnessed. That takes bravery and determination.
I tend to think Flynn's apparent errors of judgement (e.g., Pegasus, his response to the prayer issue, and now this use of USAID funds) will make it hard(er) to place him in the Trump Administration.
btw next 2 oldest
Dept of Agriculture 1862
Department of Justice 1870
Link in prior post #2142
We spend upto 10 million per employee, link has budgets
and number of employees, DoD best bang for the buck I
think at 217k/empl.
Thanks for the information.
Where does your 1 May date come from?
Same here. I will watch Trump’s interview.
It would be great to see such a disclosure about Swift.
Thank you for this additional information.
don’t know...what i thought was interesting is SCOTUS got involved.
“That follows a ruling last year by the U.S. Supreme Court that a Mexican man who gave a false SSN to get a job at an Illinois steel plant could not be convicted under federal identity theft laws because he did not knowingly use another person’s identifying number. “
I suppose i could do a deeper dig for more recent stuff...
::...Elon Musk to run almost 5 Super Bowl commercials this year....::
~~~
I wonder why this person said”almost 5.” It’s 5 or it’s another number.I don’t see how it could be “almost” any given number.
check this out...
https://www.nbcnews.com/technolog/courts-using-anothers-ssn-not-crime-6C10406382
“The courts’ logic
The U.S. Supreme Court decision was unanimous. In it, the justices found that an immigrant using an unknown person’s SSN to obtain work authorization did not “knowingly” use information that belonged to another person, as required by the statute.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
