Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear Fusion With AI – New Plant To Open Soon
Forbes ^ | 1/18/2025 | John Werner

Posted on 01/19/2025 4:52:03 AM PST by Pontiac

“Fusion is a reaction, and there’s a race right now to figure out the right machine to make that reaction happen here on Earth. The machine that would make the reaction would consume a fuel that everyone has access to - no need for uranium or plutonium and no nuclear waste - and would provide unlimited energy.”

Out of about 50 companies out there, CFS is the biggest. Mumgaard detailed advances that could lead to practical, production-level fusion processes. But challenges remain.

A reaction like this, he says, needs three things. It needs to be hot, dense and insulated.

Citing advances that outpace Moore’s law, Mumgaard suggested that a successful result in current research would lead to a plant that would outperform anything ever seen before. He explained that CFS purchased land on an inactive army base in Devens, Massachusetts, and created a commercially relevant demonstration facility called SPARC that uses high-temperature superconducting (HTS) magnets.

However, Mumgaard said his company announced the site on which CFS plans to build the world’s first grid-scale fusion power plant outside of Richmond, Virginia, bolstered by a collaboration with the utility, Dominion Energy Virginia. The proposed plant is expected to connect to the grid in the early 2030s..

Specifically, a team at Princeton University has been able to figure out how to use AI to understand and forecast plasma instabilities as the magnets work on the plasma.

In some ways, this is the most important application of artificial intelligence that you can think of. If it ends up saving our world from climate Armageddon, everything else is going to seem secondary.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Science
KEYWORDS: ai; fission; fusion; power; science; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Of course they had to work Global Warming in to the article.
1 posted on 01/19/2025 4:52:03 AM PST by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
Another source of Nuclear Fusion:


2 posted on 01/19/2025 4:58:45 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
From the article --- " ' Investors are in it for the long haul, with the capital to see it through,' he [ CEO ] said."

A "demonstration" plant for billions sounds rather like "send money."

Remember Solyndra as "the future."

For wjat it's worth, almost 60 years ago, I saw the mockup of the plasma toroid project, and "hopes." Now with Lawrence-Livermore and other competitors, it is liekly someone will try to patent ( or trademarl ) some crucial little bit to keep getting paid a while. SSDD? We'll see.

3 posted on 01/19/2025 5:00:10 AM PST by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

The first one on Earth I think.

And so much fun!


4 posted on 01/19/2025 5:00:43 AM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
We got a front-row seat to what could happen if this technology is ever perfected.

At least with quantum computing, the theory is complete and we just need to figure out the hardware and how to do it.

With cold fusion, we don't have a theory. There isn't even a plan on paper yet.

5 posted on 01/19/2025 5:02:45 AM PST by Right_Wing_Madman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

Mumgaard detailed advances that could lead to practical, production-level fusion processes. But challenges remain.


The only thing different from a similar statement from 50 years ago is the man’s name.


6 posted on 01/19/2025 5:24:33 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

WHAT_COULD_GO_WRONG_PING


7 posted on 01/19/2025 5:26:30 AM PST by The Duke (Not without incident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Actually, I saw a fairly large production facility so there is apparently some substance beyond just words.


8 posted on 01/19/2025 5:29:31 AM PST by bert ( (KE. NP. +12) Where is ZORRO when California so desperately needs him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

Skynet here we come .


9 posted on 01/19/2025 5:31:17 AM PST by ncalburt ( Gop DC Globalists are the evil )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Worldtraveler once upon a time
Now with Lawrence-Livermore and other competitors

Folks, LLNL is not a competitor. THey are a national lab. They do neat far out stuff, but they don't do commercial anything. THere is a law against it, in the first place, in the second place they are not organized for commercial competition and efficiency, and third, their is a long way between their very occasional demonstration shot and commercial fusion.

Oh, and where are you getting the tritium? You breae it in fission reactors - you know those nasty dirty proliferating fission plants that actually work if you are in France or China and are dreadful things if you are climate activist in Germany or NY City. And don't tell me you will just breed it in a fusion reactor. The numbers are really dicey even before you start worrying about the difference between theory and practice.

Tulips, Madoff, Theranos are things that come to my mind when I read this stuff. PS Nuclear fission works just fine.

10 posted on 01/19/2025 5:42:53 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

Once you really understand the concept of fusion you can understand the challenges to making it work. An example is the Sun which has unlimited free gravity to power it. Earth applications must use magnets and immense electrical power to imitate gravity. The free power is the difference between the power going in and the power produced which must be captured and converted into usable power.


11 posted on 01/19/2025 5:43:22 AM PST by RetiredTexasVet (We used to be a Republic, we are now a Fascist Klepto-Thugocracy. until Jan 20, 2025)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Duke

Well they cannot burn money as fast as the US Treasury. That is one thing they have on their side.


12 posted on 01/19/2025 5:44:06 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
he machine that would make the reaction would consume a fuel that everyone has access to

You have access to tritium? 99.99% of us don't, not in any significant quantity.

13 posted on 01/19/2025 5:45:13 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

AI the program that can’t reason , what could go wrong ,D’oh


14 posted on 01/19/2025 6:27:53 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

I saw a fairly large production facility so there is apparently some substance beyond just words

Lockheed Martin advertised a working thermonuclear reactor coming on line 5 years ago - Lockheed Martin has a very large production facility.

PS: no one anywhere in the world has sustained nuclear fusion beyond a handful of seconds, but some how these characters are way ahead of all the research facilities in the world?

Are you in the market for slightly used bridges?


15 posted on 01/19/2025 6:38:12 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

I’m sure that burning money is scalable. I’m surprised Hunter Biden isn’t heading up one of these projects. I probably shouldn’t post that on a public forum. Joe has another 26 hours to go ....


16 posted on 01/19/2025 6:54:35 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

5 or more years ago I read long article by one of the top fusion scientists for last decade or two. He said fusion will never happen - it’s a pipe dream.

The energy required just to start the fusion reaction would take more electricity than NYC and require that it be maintained for an impossible time-frame to get the fusion reaction going. I am only an old former science teacher, but it sure looked factual to me.


17 posted on 01/19/2025 7:09:18 AM PST by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arlis

Well he’s wrong, there’s been one controlled fusion reaction already, Princeton Labratories in 1978, used about one month of energy equivalency of Albany New York, captured the produced energy, but the issue is continuous firing like a piston engine, the Toroidal Magnetic field was too damaged to repeat. Heat and pressure, are the two obstacles, to be overcome. We needs shields Scotty, like the Starship Enterprise!🤔


18 posted on 01/19/2025 7:20:37 AM PST by gbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Right_Wing_Madman

They aren’t talking about cold fusion. Cold fusion is a hoax. They are discussing just fusion, hence the difficulty with containing dense and hot hydrogen long enough to produce a reaction. The theory is not lacking for fusion. It is technical issues that must be overcome. It may turn out to be economically and/or technically non viable, but fusion is certainly theoretically possible.


19 posted on 01/19/2025 7:20:51 AM PST by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

Microsoft admits you will never make AI secure ,LOL


20 posted on 01/19/2025 7:24:07 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson