They are neither.
Well…being right is kinda up there
Relatable? Impossible.
The Demonicrats are the antithesis of being right. and Demonicrats are only relatable to the demon-possessed and to traitors.
They never will be...for they SEE THEMSELVES as the SAVIORS of “democracy and freedom”.
What have they been “right” about?
"How they think the world should be" is no where near "right".
“We were right but no one believed it”
They lied to us constantly and without remorse. They were never right.
Try being relatable and right, like Trump.
It is more likely to have blown up in his head. The Crap Hill is a worthless leftist rag, unfit for the birdcage. Logic, common sense, are foreign words.
In a well-ordered society, the productive adult grunts should be the voting majority.
“We must learn to act like these odd people so they buy our crap”
I have never encountered a Democrat politician (Other than RFK Jr.) that cared about being right or relatable.
They have always appealed to negative emotions; fear, envy and hatred.
They don’t care about “reality” — they just want “power”.
You owe me a keyboard.
Well, by gosh, I think he's on to something. Maybe by actually promising policies that accommodate the real world, rather than trying to implement utopian horse s***, they can win elections honestly, rather than steal them.
I think the author means they need to be better liars.
Seriously, how many R’s switch to D’s? Especially when there’s an entire ‘walk away’ movement on YouTube of people narrating why they left the D’s.
And again, they always seem to think it’s about ‘messaging’...not having wrong ideas. They’re so stubbornly arrogant they don’t even consider being ‘wrong’. So the only question they have is “how do we communicate our message more effectively?”.
Inevitably, it ends up just name-calling people to shame them and shut them up. It doesn’t convince people of anything, then they vote....and the D’s are ‘shocked’ again. I think, ultimately, identity politics is all about crafting a narrative for individual demographics and trying to tell each group they’re stupid for not going along with the narrative, because “how can you not vote in your best interests?”. It’s just a ‘shut up and vote how we tell you to’ narrative, dissention will be shamed.
That’s all they have. Then you look at their ideas...men can be women. Fetus’ aren’t human. God has no place in their platform. Policies causing inflation, mandating EV’s, all energy being ‘renewables’, allowing an invasion, endless socialist programs, etc... At the end of the day, these utopian promises die the death they deserve....especially when presented together as a platform.
But no, it’s not the ideas, just the messaging...because it can’t be that they’re wrong.
No credibility. I could see not being on a team at all but do this? In 2016? Piss poor judgement and insane.