Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elon Musk's Starship booster captured in world first ["Chopsticks"]
bbc ^ | 10/12/2024 | Esme Stallard

Posted on 10/13/2024 11:36:53 AM PDT by BenLurkin

Elon Musk’s Starship rocket has completed a world first after part of it was captured on its return to the launch pad.

The SpaceX vehicle's lower half manoeuvred back beside its launch tower where it was caught in a giant pair of mechanical arms, as part of its first test flight.

It brings SpaceX’s ambition of developing a fully reusable and rapidly deployable rocket a big step closer.

"A day for the history books," engineers at SpaceX declared as the booster landed safely.

The chances of the bottom part of the rocket, known as the Super Heavy booster, being caught so cleanly on the first attempt seemed slim.

Prior to the launch, the SpaceX team said it would not be surprised if the booster was instead directed to land in the Gulf of Mexico.

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Science
KEYWORDS: spacex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Kipp

Among the issues raised were Musk’s decision to insert himself in the presidential race ...“Elon Musk is hopping about the country, spewing and tweeting political falsehoods and attacking [the Federal Emergency Management Agency] while claiming his desire to help hurricane victims with free Starlink access to the internet,” Commissioner Gretchen Newsom said.

Commissioner Gretchen Newsom is the “Political Director” for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 569.


21 posted on 10/13/2024 12:57:10 PM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“It brings SpaceX’s ambition of developing a fully reusable and rapidly deployable rocket a big step closer.”

Falcon 9 anyone?


22 posted on 10/13/2024 1:12:50 PM PDT by FrankRizzo890
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kipp

Isn’t this was fascism would look like, if ever there were to be fascism here?


23 posted on 10/13/2024 1:14:19 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Zathras
See my comments HERE. SpaceX is a NASA contractor. You can't (intelligently) pit one against the other.
24 posted on 10/13/2024 1:16:33 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RckyRaCoCo
Birds were scared.

I saw that in the video.

25 posted on 10/13/2024 1:17:25 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (7,797,618 Truth | 91,192,773 Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
The model they are working under doesn’t work.

The model NASA is working under is "contract our rocket-building work to SpaceX". It's working spectacularly.

It's the same model NASA worked under to for Mercury. And Gemini. And Apollo. And Space Shuttle. And every unmanned spacecraft they ever launched.

26 posted on 10/13/2024 1:19:13 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pres Raygun

China’s Long March rockets will be on the moon long before NASA/SpaceX’s Artemis, maybe by a decade as things are going now at NASA.


27 posted on 10/13/2024 1:25:02 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kipp

California rejected

Musk does not care what some coastal commission thinks and has said so.


28 posted on 10/13/2024 1:26:31 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FrankRizzo890

Falcon second stage isn’t reusable. The original plan was to recover the second stage and hot-land the Dragon. Both of those goals were dropped as too ambitious even for SpaceX.


29 posted on 10/13/2024 1:30:43 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: FrankRizzo890

Falcon 9 is partially reusable system, and reuse isn’t as rapid as they intend for starship and booster. This next step is still in development, but they hope to launch, catch and reuse within a few days, depending on fuel farm capacity.


30 posted on 10/13/2024 1:34:41 PM PDT by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PIF

I doubt your premise, but even if China gets to the moon before SpaceX, the Starship fleet within a few short years will have orders of magnitude more launch capacity than the rest of the world combined and thus in a position to completely control low earth orbit, if necessary.


31 posted on 10/13/2024 1:37:46 PM PDT by Pres Raygun (Repent America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

The world may not have fully absorbed the military implications of a spacecraft able to deliver tons to orbit on demand and on short notice

The military is well aware of SpaceX’s capabilities, and they have used Falcon Heavy to get one of their satellites in to a Direct to Geosynchronous Orbit.

However, the fairing on Starship is too small for their future wants, and Starship would have to be refueled to get from LEO to Geosynchronous, which is why the contract for Direct to Geosynchronous Orbit went to Blue Horizon which does have a much larger fairing and theoretically can go the distance, at some point.

Falcon Heavy has reached its maximum capacity as far as large military satellites go. The military cannot wait for a refueling mission to complete. And cannot wait for Must to provide some sort of lash up. Starship is out of the question as the current version can only lift 50 tons to LEO. Version 2 and 3 can lift more, but are still on the drawing boards.


32 posted on 10/13/2024 1:38:10 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I watched the video and am amazed at what Space X has done in such a short time span. First rate results when unhampered by graft and corruption which permeate anything our governmental agencies control.


33 posted on 10/13/2024 1:38:41 PM PDT by mythenjoseph (`Islam has no place within a Christian society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

That was a slam dunk, an end zone spike, and a grand slam home run all packed into one. The boy’s got style.


34 posted on 10/13/2024 1:40:45 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Elon and Space X sent a skyscraper into space, brought it back, and parallel parked it.

Plus Starship 5 launch has been ready to go for months and the FAA would not give them a license to land it off the Texas coast. Congress and NASA stepped in and told the FAA to shove it and let Space X launch.

35 posted on 10/13/2024 1:41:30 PM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pres Raygun

The premise is simple - right now NASA’s moon program is almost 5 years behind schedule; China’s program is on schedule.

NASA’s lunar program has not decided how to proceed - its completely unraveled. Set backs on Starship have pushed it back further.

It will take 15 refueling to get one crew to the moon and more to get them home. Starship is too heavy - the stainless steel weighs many many times the more expensive composite every one else uses.

How many refuelings will it take to get one crew to Mars? Far too many to even contemplate.

Musk will have to switch to composite at some point to achieve the goals he has set. Its all about mass and weight.


36 posted on 10/13/2024 1:45:24 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Pres Raygun

“thus in a position to completely control low earth orbit, if necessary.”

Define “completely control”. No one has the ability or could have the ability to do that.


37 posted on 10/13/2024 1:45:32 PM PDT by CodeToad (Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

Somehow Musk and SpaceX have assembled a niche engineering team every bit reminiscent of NASA in the 60s, just as competent and even more innovative, but a bit more casually dressed!


38 posted on 10/13/2024 1:59:49 PM PDT by steve86 (Numquam accusatus, numquam ad curiam ibit, numquam ad carcerem™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PIF

“Its all about mass and weight”

Well, weight is not an operational property in space and mass is really only relevant during launch and thrust maneuvers. 33 rocket engines can overcome a lot.


39 posted on 10/13/2024 2:04:06 PM PDT by steve86 (Numquam accusatus, numquam ad curiam ibit, numquam ad carcerem™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

bump

That was awesome!


40 posted on 10/13/2024 2:04:13 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Clay Bevis and Cuck Butthead are panty wadded, pearl clutching cowards. Rush deserves better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson