Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NFL to use facial recognition on every fan this season.
Twitter / X / Citizen's Free Press ^ | August 4, 2024 | Staff

Posted on 08/05/2024 8:31:15 AM PDT by Red Badger

This year all 32 NFL teams will start using facial recognition to verify the identity of people entering the stadium.

This is a clip that was posted recently on the Dallas Cowboys website. It shows how easy it is to identify someone in these large crowds.

VIDEO AT LINK......................


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Military/Veterans; Sports
KEYWORDS: 0boycottfail; 0failedboycott; 0mostwatchedtv; 0recordprofits; 1619project; blackkk; blackliesmanors; blackliesmatter; blacklivesmatter; blm; creepstate; criticalracetheory; crt; deepstate; minorityreport; nationalfacialleague; nfl; nofansleft; philipkdick; policestate; singlepartystate; stevenspielberg; stopandfrisk; surveillancestate; theminorityreport; youllstillwatchlmao
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: ViLaLuz

Just wait until it’s made mandatory at all business venues......................


61 posted on 08/05/2024 9:14:22 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Security...................


62 posted on 08/05/2024 9:14:36 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

And by the way, that picture was not taken by an acquaintance sitting somewhere. That was a company associated with the stadium/football team taking that picture and putting it up on a website so you could look at it if you wished.

What company was that? I don’t remember. But that is the point. It doesn’t matter if it is a company or the government doing it. The two are doing things like this hand in hand.


63 posted on 08/05/2024 9:20:31 AM PDT by rlmorel (J.D. Vance and The Legend of The MaMaw of The 19 Loaded Guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

then i’ll wear a veil and claim its a religious thing and threaten to sue of they make me take it off.


64 posted on 08/05/2024 9:20:44 AM PDT by God luvs America (6young 3.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Sure.

Like I trust our government to keep terrorists out.


65 posted on 08/05/2024 9:23:41 AM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: HombreSecreto

Next comes the “no face coverings” rule...


66 posted on 08/05/2024 9:26:02 AM PDT by Zack Attack (✔)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Yes. The announcement said that the ‘data’ would not be used outside the stadium.

Riiiight, and if anybody actually believes that, they will sell you a bridge in NYC..................


67 posted on 08/05/2024 9:30:49 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

I have long-suspected that Walmart has facial recognition

Had heard the rumor as well


68 posted on 08/05/2024 9:38:03 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

So wear a baseball cap, a covid mask, and eyeglasses. I have read that facial recognition does not work well with black people. Whites and paleface Asians are out of luck.

“Facial recognition technology has been shown to have significant issues with accurately identifying Black people, particularly those with darker skin tones. This bias in facial recognition systems has several important implications”
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/facial-recognition-does-not-wo-DYpc59x8QOyayexzDuPaGw


69 posted on 08/05/2024 9:39:15 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu
This discussion is ENTIRELY about access.

No, it's about unreasonable searches. Are you required to have your photo taken to walk on a sidewalk? enter a library? enter a museum? shop in a store? vote?

Yet the NFL is requiring you give up rights in order to enter a building that YOU paid for.

A korporation carrying out the orders of government oppression is the definition of fascism.

70 posted on 08/05/2024 9:40:34 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I have read that facial recognition does not work well with black people. Whites and paleface Asians are out of luck.

Maybe that's a 'feature' not a 'bug'!...................

71 posted on 08/05/2024 9:40:46 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

Nope. Surveillance photos have long been accepted as not a search. If you’re face is out it’s available for pictures as long as they’re not publishing for profit. As for your list: yes, yes, yes, yes, and if the building the voting is happening in has surveillance yes.

NFL isn’t requiring you give up anything. You have no right to not be surveilled in somebody else’s property. Every sports stadium in the country has had surveillance cameras for DECADES. Welcome to the party pal.


72 posted on 08/05/2024 10:04:14 AM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: discostu
If you’re face is out...

Except it's not just out in public. You're being required to show it in order to pass.

You have no right to not be surveilled in somebody else’s property...

Except it's also YOUR property.

Every sports stadium in the country has had surveillance cameras for DECADES. Welcome to the party pal.

But didn't require surveilling your face it get IN to the stadium. Previously, you could show up with your face painted, your "dogpound" mask, etc. See the difference, pal?

73 posted on 08/05/2024 10:23:44 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

That’s out in public.

It’s NOT my property. As I already showed, just because they get public funding does NOT make the building public property.

Yes they actually do. Because the first place security cameras go is on all doors. You can STILL show up with your face painted and mask on. For one thing keep in mind that these facial recognition system are going on the SECURITY doors, the stuff you need special access passes to get to. For another, they’ve always been able to ask you to take the mask off during entry. THEIR PROPERTY THEIR RULES.

Really none of this is new. It’s just faster now. Security cameras have been on most commercial buildings since the 70s. When web cams became cheap they got on a lot of houses, and city run vehicles. You literally can’t go out of your house without landing on somebody’s camera. Your neighbor’s ring, that convenience store’s door camera, or gas pump cameras, that city bus’ driving camera.

You’re 50 years TOO LATE. The cows left the barn in the 50s. In the 90s the barn burned down. We live in security camera land now. Deal with it. Or become a Mountain Man I guess... Of course we take satellite pictures of almost everything these days, so even Jeremiah Johnson gets his picture taken.


74 posted on 08/05/2024 11:33:29 AM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

It’s definitely not a rumor. If you try and search the name of the facial recognition system used you get an error.


75 posted on 08/05/2024 11:34:52 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: discostu
It's NOT just their property. These places are run by "sports and exposition authorities" because they're not privately owned. Heck - the Green Bay Packers are outright owned by the citizens of Green Bay.

As for living in security camera land now...




Enjoy your Soma.

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
― Samuel Adams

The rest of us recognize this is a Free Republic.

76 posted on 08/05/2024 11:40:36 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Correct title should be every fan entering the stadiums. They are not going into your TV to do facial Rec. Not Yet.


77 posted on 08/05/2024 11:45:47 AM PDT by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

They ARE their property. “sports and exposition authorities” means NOTHING, that’s just you making crap up. And yes actually other than the Packers they ARE privately owned. And even selling stock (which might or might not be owned by the citizens of Green Bay) it’s still a PRIVATE COMPANY.

You’re basically just throwing random words in a temper tantrum. Out here in REALITY security cameras exist. Limited access exists. Private companies are allowed to have them. Even if they take government subsidies. Even if they’re publicly traded. Even if you don’t like it.

Even in a free republic people and companies are still allowed security. And control of access. Just look at how many people have been banned from this board. Access control still exists on and in Free Republic.


78 posted on 08/05/2024 11:52:20 AM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: discostu

I take it you post the same on DU.


79 posted on 08/05/2024 11:55:00 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

I take it by your need to go personal that you realize none of the facts back you. Therefore you know you’re wrong. But are unwilling to admit it.


80 posted on 08/05/2024 12:03:01 PM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson