She doesnβt know anything about that loaded gun she put in the hands of a crazed libtard
He hired a totally unqualified person to handle deadly weapons. He is equally to blame.
So not only did that irresponsible jerk murder an innocent woman, but he ruined this young woman’s life.
She looks awfully young for a job like that - she looks like a high-school kid.
In my opinion, the only one guilty is Baldwin
Not for nothing....This isn’t right. The prop manager had her rolling cigarettes...She wasn’t her own boss. And the props mabager threw shells away. And the project manager agreed to testify against the armorer for total immunity.
Someone died. Somebody has got to go to prison and it can’t be the star of the movie. He’s the Official Commie Liberal of the DemonRAT Partay.
That chick showed no emotion during the trial, even when the witnesses were describing the victim basically dying right in front of their eyes.....she just sat their stone faced.
I can’t believe she’s only facing 18 months. SMH
One dead, one wounded. That’s only a one quarter mass murder using the Democrat’s Mass Murder Calculation.
So when’s the walking penis that aimed and shot the gun at the victim going to prison? And for how long?
There was a lot of misinformation going around when this first happened. It is NOT an actor’s job to check a firearm. That is always done first by the armorer. If an actor checks a firearm, drops a clip and loads another, etc., it’s because it’s in the script. If an actor checks a firearm without it being in the script it’s the job of the director to call CUT (or sometimes the armorer will tell the Director) and have the armorer recheck the firearm. There’s a reason why there are so few firearms accidents on movie sets. The rules are very, very strict.
Now that the armorer has been convicted, Baldwin will be tried next. He has two potentially big problems. First, if he hired this woman to cut corners he could be found guilty (on whatever charge they bring). Second, the word from her attorneys is Baldwin went off script and pointed the firearm at the cinematographer during the shot. That could bring a Reckless Endangerment charge.
Not a fan of hers and her court room behavior reinforces that BUT I donβt think they have made the case that she is responsible. There was testimony that the prop guns were, at times, used for live fire target price. This means other people were bringing live ammo on set and using it with the prop guns. Definitely raises the possibility that others were introducing live ammo. This should have been an easy case for her attorneys to make.
She sounds incompetent, but...am I the only one who gets the feeling this is simply to protect Alec Baldwin. I mean, he hired her, right?
Meanwhile, the guy who pulled the trigger is still walking around.
These are always tough cases. The defendant didn’t intend to hurt anyone. She should have never had this type of assignment. On the other hand, you have a death and a grieving family. The sentence should be 6 months and probation, not the maximum 18 months IMHO>
The jack wad who pulled the trigger is the only one who shouldβve been charged. I donβt care what someone hands me. I treat all guns as if they are loaded
Did they ever say where the live ammo came from?
So how much time did this guy serve?