Not a fan of hers and her court room behavior reinforces that BUT I don’t think they have made the case that she is responsible. There was testimony that the prop guns were, at times, used for live fire target price. This means other people were bringing live ammo on set and using it with the prop guns. Definitely raises the possibility that others were introducing live ammo. This should have been an easy case for her attorneys to make.
As the armorer, she was supposed to keep the guns locked up in a locker when they weren't being used on the set. How did the others use it for live fire without her first making the gun available to them?
-PJ
Defendents are instructed by their lawyers not to show emotion in court.
None of that makes any sense. Why would people who bought ammo not have their own weapons? Why would they want to use PROP GUNS on a movie set that they were not part of ? Even if they were some of the crew, again why use the studio's gun on movie set when not filming ?