Cancer Is Striking More Young People, and Doctors Are Alarmed and Baffled

A Freudian slip, or a news anchor going rouge? pic.twitter.com/LtFwvSYoYW— Sassy red socks (@Twitawoo8) January 10, 2024

Nothing to do with the coronovirus jab huh?

Well, yes. But of course.

But not in 2019.

I view this as one piece of the larger play of propaganda to make the looming wave of cancers from the jabs ‘expected’ among the population.

Reread the piece carefully: The progressive tool of an author opens the article about a 2023 case of cancer and ‘jumps’ to studies published prior to the plandemic to explain it.

Of course, for many of us we see right through it...

But it doesn’t change the fact that the health of Americans was declining precipitously prior to 2020.

Just expect more of this blather as they race to circle the wagons as all of the evidence stacks up against them in the coming months/years, particularly as the rate of disease skyrockets among the population of the jabbed.

You are wrong wrong wrong. It is white supremacy.

I love it when people who are neck-deep in pseudoscience and conspiracies challenge me to show the science.

Let's be honest, mkay? I provide references to support the specific scientific points I make. Do you read the references? Have you ever followed a link to a real research or review paper and read it for yourself? Do you even read the links to informational articles that aren't published in the scientific literature? If you take the time to read the references for yourself, you should be able to quickly ascertain if I am lying or describing the science accurately.

The fact that the average life span was less than 40 years before vaccines were introduced and is now over 70 years should pretty much speak for itself. According to this article, Life expectancy (from birth) in the United States, from 1860 to 2020*, life expectancy rose from 39.4 years in 1860 to 78.9 years in 2020. The primary reason for this is vaccines, since the major cause of death prior to them was infectious disease. Because of Covid, however, the life expectancy has dropped. I cannot find any recent articles, but in mid 2022, it had dropped by 1.5 years. COVID-19 deaths tied to US life expectancy drop.

The median age of cancer diagnosis is 66 years, meaning that half of all diagnoses occur before this age and half after. Cancer Incidence Rates by Age. If you scroll down to the "Cancer Cases by Age Groups" section, the table clearly shows that the rate of cancer diagnosis goes up significantly at age 45.

It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that if the bulk of cancer diagnoses take place after age 45, but historically, life expectancy was less than 40 years, cancer rates did go up when vaccination programs increased life expectancy. Vaccines cause longer life, which increases risk of cancer. The first vaccine (against smallpox) was introduced in 1796.

And don't you think that requiring children to receive 50+ shots is beyond the pale? How can you be certain that they don't cause anything amiss?

No, I don't think that using children's own immune systems to protect them from deadly diseases that used to kill half of all children is "beyond the pale." And I can be certain they don't cause anything amiss because I understand the immune process. Vaccines do not actually do anything, but the immune system sees them as if they are a real pathogen. And the immune system reacts accordingly. A person who is immunocompromised can receive vaccines, but without immune function, vaccines are no different than saline injections.

Let me explain a bit about antigens, because I see that the number of antigens is used by professional antivaxxers to scare people who really don't know what an antigen is. An antigen is any protein that the immune system recognizes as foreign and can produce a specific antibody, T-cell, and B-cell response to. Many vaccines have been refined greatly, such that they only contain the antigen that will induce the formation of protective antibodies. For example, the pertussis vaccine used to contain killed Bordetella pertussis. This organism contains over 1,000 proteins and 99 lipids, all of which are potential antigens: Deep longitudinal multi-omics analysis of Bordetella pertussis cultivated in bioreactors highlights medium starvations and transitory metabolisms, associated to vaccine antigen biosynthesis variations and global virulence regulation. However, newer pertussis vaccines contain only 2 or 5 antigens. Thus, the number of antigens dropped by over 1,000 when using the new acellular vaccines. Like the immunity against many other pathogens, pertussis immunity drops over time, so periodic boosters are needed. It is always a good idea for pregnant women and people around them to get a pertussis booster to protect the baby.

And since vaccines are often grown in different animals (mice, etc), we can't be sure if the vaccines might not carry cross species contaminants to the recipient.

Vaccines actually are not grown in animals. Some are grown in animal cells, but none are grown in animals. As for "cross-species contaminents", you are exposed to those all the time. All of that food you keep eating is chock full of proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids which can and do enter your blood. Have you started developing cow traits because you ate steak last week?

Based on the past few years, I'm not buying the 'trust us, we know more than you' wave of the hand by the Medical community.

Oh, that's funny. The medical science community is extremely open about our work. The Pubmed database contains the references for scientific papers published all over the world since the 1700s or maybe earlier. Most of these references contain an abstract (summary) of the paper and a link to the paper. These papers are all accessible by the general public, although some journals have a paywall. If you don't think that something the medical/scientific community tells you is true, you can always look it up and read the research for yourself. If, for example, the methodology, analysis, or conclusions of Efficacy and Safety of an mRNA-Based RSV PreF Vaccine in Older Adults are wrong or flawed, you should be able to determine that by reading the paper.

But you know who says "Trust us, we know more than you"? Charlatans. Quacks who run websites and sell fake supplements and devices. Professional antivaxxers who keep deluging any media outlet that will allow them with highly emotional fearmongering. Next time you read one of those, pay attention to the language used. It is designed to evoke emotion and deactivate logical thought processes. Often, they refer vaguely to some study that was done somewhere, giving only enough detail that someone who is expert in finding their way around the scientific literature can find it. Sometimes, they fabricate references or modify real references to make them difficult to find. Once in a while, they link to a real reference, but if you read it, you will see that the authors of the study, who actually designed, carried out, and analyzed the research, came up with conclusions that are opposite what the antivaxxers told you they found. But you will choose to believe the quacks because they engage your emotions, rather than the scientists who describe everything as objectively as possible.

https://rumble.com/v33shjt-dr.-mike-yeadon-part-i-here-are-three-mechanisms-by-which-this-gene-therapy.html?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

The LNPs were known in the peer-reviewed literature to have an affinity for the ovaries and testes, as early as 2012.

Except that it's not a few hours, there is research showing it is a few months and it winds up in tissues that are never touched by a normal viral infection.

If such research exists, you can link to a citation of the original research paper. You can find medical literature at the website Pubmed. Since sometimes it is difficult to narrow down a Pubmed search to return only the desired results, you can alternatively do a search in Google (Duckduckgo/Yahoo/Bing/etc.) and find the paper that way. You will know it is a legitimate link if the acronym "NCBI" or "NIH" shows in the link or it is a CDC or WHO link.

The lifetime of mRNA in the cytoplasm is a few hours. While it is possible for the nanolipid mRNA particles to persist for longer outside of a cell, they can't do anything. The mRNA can only direct the synthesis of a protein from inside the cytoplasm of a cell.

Also, I would be very interested to hear which tissues are never touched by a viral infection. If a cell exists in the body, it is covered in cell surface receptors. As long as a virus can recognize those receptors, that cell can be infected. It doesn't matter in which tissue the cell is, the only pertinent fact is whether a particular virus can attach to a cell receptor on its surface.

And you already destroyed your credibility by equivocating eating a steak to getting an injection.

When you eat a steak (or any other food), its protein, nucleic acids, and lipids leave your intestines and enter your blood. Once in the blood, they are distributed all over your body. A vaccine injection doesn't even go into the blood, it goes into muscle tissue where the lymphatic system collects it and delivers it to adjacent lymph nodes. If anything, you should be MORE worried about all of that cow DNA in your blood.

And normal vaccines are better than getting the disease because they work.

"Normal" vaccines do not actually do anything. The purpose of any vaccine is to induce an adaptive immune response, which is work done by the immune system, not the vaccine. Also, no "normal" vaccine can prevent 100% of illness in 100% of recipients. A recipient who is immunocompromised might not have an immune response to a vaccine at all and will remain susceptible to the disease.

The vaccinated people I know get COVID several times a year.

Really? Why do I find myself so skeptical of this statement, which I've already seen dozens of times on a variety of websites? Do you know a lot of immunocompromised people? If they are so immunocompromised that they keep catching Covid over and over despite being vaccinated, how is it that they have survived it multiple times? Each time you catch Covid, it causes more harm to the body.

In reality, of course, the vaccine induces the immune system to produce T-cells, B-cells, and antibodies that specifically recognize the spike protein that is on the surface of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. When the antibodies attach to the spike, they physically block the virus from attaching to a cell. The antibodies also signal to the macrophages to destroy the virus.

Of all the vaccinated people I know, only one has come down with Covid. And it was a very mild case which caused some sniffles and not much else. It was mild because he had those antibodies. Those of us who were quarantined for a week in the same room as him (we were travelling together) did not catch Covid.

p

I got news for ya. The jab is not a “vaccine”. They changed the definition of “vaccine” to accommodate the jab.

And you "know" they changed the definition, how? Because you read it on some antivax medical misinformation site, it must be true?

A vaccine is any compound that contains an antigen that induces the immune system to produce specific T-cells, B-cells, and antibodies that recognize the antigen. I don't care what any dictionary definition says, I only care about what the physical process is.

And you know the funny thing about antigens? They don't have to be associated with a pathogen at all. Most vaccines aren't even used in medicine, they are used to cause animals to make antibodies which are used in research.

As far as the science goes, all of the Covid vaccines are true vaccines.

As a physician with a husband with a PhD in biochemistry

If you are really a physician and your husband has a PhD in biochemistry, then why do I have to explain to you the nuances of feline injection site sarcoma causation, especially when I'm using the information in the articles YOU linked to do so?

While I recognize that the majority of physicians are not trained in research methodology, you still ought to be able to read and understand the medical literature. I'm pretty sure they teach that much in medical school. Plus, isn't there an ongoing CE requirement which includes reading medical literature in order to keep your license?

When the articles YOU linked state that feline injection site sarcoma is related to the injection injury, not the syringe contents, I am not engaging in pseudoscience when I point that out.

I am not hugely concerned about the childhood vaccines causing cancer. But I threw the increase out there as one generational change among many.

I am not at all concerned about that, because that association would have been noticed when we first started vaccinating children two hundred years ago.

I do wonder about the role of past cancer treatments which have saved children who otherwise would have died. Childhood cancers are more likely to be caused by genetic factors than anything else. When all of those people who survive a childhood cancer grow up and have their own children, aren't they passing along the cancer genes that would otherwise have disappeared if they had died as children?

Beyond the killed and inactivated pathogens in vaccines, the kind of antigens we evolved to deal with, there are preservatives, adjuvants, biological impurities and other possible contaminants.

The dose of non-antigen components of the vaccine is so low that I don't worry about them. Biological impurities and trace toxins are a part of every day life. I *would* worry about a vaccine that was not stored properly or which might be contaminated, but there are safeguards to reduce the chance of those events.

Another one of you, “who you going to believe, me or your lying eyes” people.

It’s too bad you won’t do your own research, and I quit posting links to papers a long time ago. No amount of data will sway you true believers, but at least other people can know the research is out there.

Also, I imagine the names Lapado and Paxton mean nothing to you?

The vaccine injection absolutely ends up in the blood and seems to induce the liver and gonads to produce the spike proteins.

One of the reasons the vaccinated keep getting COVID is that the body keeps producing the spike protein and the immune system eventually stops responding to it as an infection.

Plus there is plenty of research showing that the shots initially depress the immune system and any protection fades very quickly. This (and their greed) is why there was a booster mania for a while.

And yes, everyone around me who was vaccinated gets COVID continuously. The unvaccinated don’t. The garbage people like you keep posting means nothing next to my own experience and research.

Re:145

No, I didn't read your links. But since you are big on reading material, have you read 'Turtles All the Way Down'? Or, 'Dissolving Illusions'?
I'm sure from your standpoint they are pure quackery, but at least reading this material should throttle back your bold assertion that:

The fact that the average life span was less than 40 years before vaccines were introduced and is now over 70 years should pretty much speak for itself.

"Speak for itself" certainly sounds like a phrase applicable to the Scientific Method.

On the other hand, if I look at the mortality rates from various of the dreaded diseases, I have to note that the precipitous drop in these mortality rates occurred before the administration of these vaccines, and not after. And a better explanation, that 'might speak for itself', is that these drops occurred with the implementation of better hygienic practices and better diets. The vaccines came afterwards. The data that you claim 'speaks for itself' seems more akin to the classic example of the parade having gotten started, and then someone running to the front of the parade, and pretending that they they were always leading the parade. That is, the vaccines might have provided some small benefit (maybe), but not the major benefit. And there are enough claims from parents, or patients, to lead one to believe that these same vaccines produced a lot of negative effects in their wake (e.g., autism rates, autoimmune diseases, cancers, heart problems, etc).

Also, I would be very interested to hear which tissues are never touched by a viral infection. If a cell exists in the body, it is covered in cell surface receptors. As long as a virus can recognize those receptors, that cell can be infected. It doesn't matter in which tissue the cell is, the only pertinent fact is whether a particular virus can attach to a cell receptor on its surface.

Hey Dingbat,

the virus has to *reach* the cell first.

The LNPs get a triple head start: first by being injected directly into the bloodstream (close enough, given the perfusion of muscle tissue), then, by the LNPs not setting off either the innate or adaptive immune system, and finally, by the LNP not having to find a cell with a specific matching receptor in order to inject its payload into the cytoplasm. But I guess they never told you that either in your talking points or in CALCULUS! class.

It’s too bad you won’t do your own research, and I quit posting links to papers a long time ago. No amount of data will sway you true believers, but at least other people can know the research is out there.

Hint: if you really want to convince an infectious disease countermeasures scientist that there is alternative research out there conducted independently of the scientific community, it is up to you to produce the references. And I mean real research, with written research protocols, valid experimental methods, data collection and analysis, etc., not some pseudoreview that merely takes the scientific literature and cherry picks phrases that can be presented out-of-context to scare the scientifically illiterate.

Also, I imagine the names Lapado and Paxton mean nothing to you?

Ladapo (NOT "Lapado") is a scumbag who, despite a stellar Harvard education and former position as a professor at New York University then at UCLA, decided to start lying to people about the safety of Covid vaccines. He is not the first physician to throw away a respectable career in order to peddle snake oil. It's sad that that happens.

And Paxton--are you talking about the Texas lawyer/politician who has decided to jump on the medical misinformation/conspiracy bandwagon because he has judged that as a way to get ahead politically? Personally, I think that is a bad career move for any politician. The fact that misinformation has been targeted specifically at conservatives and those who believe it are annoying loud about it does not mean that all conservatives have rejected medical science. A majority of us still accept the validity of science.

The vaccine injection absolutely ends up in the blood and seems to induce the liver and gonads to produce the spike proteins.

That's a pretty incredible claim, not to mention highly improbable. Do you have a link to the original research study published in a reputable medical journal and indexed in Pubmed to back that up?

One of the reasons the vaccinated keep getting COVID is that the body keeps producing the spike protein and the immune system eventually stops responding to it as an infection.

Oh, my. You have absolutely NO understanding of how the immune system works. You don't keep immunity by keeping pathogens in your body. That isn't how it works at all, not even close. I'll help you out a bit. Here's a Khan Academy article on immune function which isn't overly technical and has plenty of illustrations: Adaptive immunity.

If you read that educational article, you will notice that nowhere does it say the immune system retains immunity by keeping antigens around. Nowhere.

That said, I will point out an example where the pathogen does stick around. In these cases, the continued presence of the pathogen acts as a sort of booster to keep up immunity against the pathogen. For example, your body never gets rid of the varicella virus after you have chicken pox. That virus enters your nerves and stays there for the rest of your life. As long as your immune system is working adequately, that virus cannot do anything because any time a virus particle emerges from the nerve, the immune system destroys it immediately. Your immune system will *never* stop responding to the varicella as an infection. What happens is that the immune system weakens and its ability to fight all pathogens decreases. Then the varicella virus can cause shingles. This usually happens in older people (over age 65) because the immune system weakens as you age, but can also happen if the person has stress (which impacts the immune system) or takes medications or develops a disease which affects immune function.

Plus there is plenty of research showing that the shots initially depress the immune system and any protection fades very quickly.

Again, where are the references published in the medical/scientific literature? Vaccines do not "depress" the immune system, and immunity against many pathogens does not last for long. This is why there are boosters for most vaccines. No vaccine can cause the immune system to become permanently immune to pathogens when it naturally loses immunity over time.

And yes, everyone around me who was vaccinated gets COVID continuously.

Really? Lab-confirmed Covid? And they are still alive after multiple bouts, despite not having a functional immune system? Once again, high levels of skepticism here. I've seen that claim made several times by people trying to push an antivax agenda. They use almost the same words you do. Another claim they like to make is that they personally know several people who experienced serious adverse effects from the vaccine, which is statistically impossible. I'm surprised you haven't tried to make that claim, as well.

Because of the nature of a Covid infection, I seriously doubt anyone can survive multiple bouts of it. A person can only handle so much damage to the heart or lungs before they give out. Furthermore, if a person's immune function is so weak that a Covid vaccine does not give them immunity, how on earth are they going to fight off a Covid infection? It takes a functioning immune system to survive Covid!

The garbage people like you keep posting means nothing next to my own experience and research.

Your experience? Questionable. Your research? Have you written a research protocol and conducted your own study? Did you conduct some clinical trials? Have you done a comparative study measuring protective antibody titers following vaccination or lab-confirmed Covid? Did you isolate and sequence SARS-CoV-2 viruses to identify the predominant circulating strain? Have you even done an extensive medical literature review on anything related to Covid? (And by "medical literature" I mean literature published in a high quality journal and indexed in PubMed or another reputable database, not some questionable "review" posted online at a fake journal website.)

Another claim they like to make is that they personally know several people who experienced serious adverse effects from the vaccine, which is statistically impossible.

Only if you believe the Pfauci cover-up on the rate of adverse events.

And you may have noticed, nobody is buying your lies anymore: having several friends get sick and/or die from the clot shots, means you suddenly stop trusting "official" sources.

You've eaten all the seed corn on an entire industry's credibility.

Dingbat.

Whatever you say.

What you don’t understand you can’t explain so don’t bother. I will do you the favor of ignoring your posts in future.

And you "know" they changed the definition, how? Because you read it on some antivax medical misinformation site, it must be true?

You're so full of sh!t it staggers the human mind.

Ladapo (NOT "Lapado") is a scumbag who, despite a stellar Harvard education and former position as a professor at New York University then at UCLA, decided to start lying to people about the safety of Covid vaccines. He is not the first physician to throw away a respectable career in order to peddle snake oil. It's sad that that happens.

Did you work in his lab, too, like you did Dr. Malone's?