New Zealand Government Data Administrator who worked on Covid Vaccine Payment System Exposes Shocking Data on Vaccine-related Deaths

Aussie 17 ^ | 12/01/2023

[SeekAndFind]

In a revealing interview with Liz Gunn, a New Zealand government data administrator identified as Winston Smith has come forward with startling claims regarding the consequences of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in New Zealand.

Winston Smith emphasizes that he is not an anti-vaxxer. He clarifies that he has been vaccinated in the past and has even contributed to building the COVID vaccination system in New Zealand, which gave him access to the data , making it clear that his stance is not born from opposition to vaccines on principle.

Winston findings on the mortality rates associated with various COVID-19 vaccine batches present a very concerning picture, suggesting a correlation that seems highly improbable to occur by chance alone. For instance, looking at the top ten batches with the highest mortality rate, he found the following:

• For batch 1, out of 711 vaccinated individuals, 152 fatalities were reported, indicating a staggering 21% mortality rate

• Batch 8, with a 17% mortality rate,

• Batch 3 with 15% mortality rate

• Even among larger sample sizes, such as batch number 70 that vaccinated 11,000 individuals, there were 498 deaths accounted for, representing a 4% mortality rate.

Such numbers vastly exceed the expected mortality rates which is 0.75% and with Smith's meticulous approach and diverse age distribution consideration, the suggestion that these outcomes are mathematically bordering on impossible becomes difficult to ignore.

Winston also illustrated the data from the perspective of the vaccinators. The most extreme case presented by Smith – labeled simply as “Vaccinator One” – paints a grim picture: out of 246 vaccinations administered by “Vaccinator One”, there had been 60 deaths, marking nearly a 25% mortality rate. Again, this figure dwarfs the expected mortality rate of 0.75%. When examining further, this pattern seemed to persist across profiles; another vaccinator had seen nearly 17% mortality, with 104 deaths out of 621 vaccinations given.

The data unequivocally suggests that there is a statistically significant correlation between specific vaccine batches and the subsequent mortality rates observed. It would be mathematically implausible to attribute these high rates of death following vaccination to random chance alone, thereby implicating the batches as a significant factor in the increased mortality.

If you have an hour available, I recommend viewing the entire video for a comprehensive understanding. However, if time is scarce, here is a condensed 10-minute version that captures the crucial highlights.

Loading video

Signing off for now
A17

Quick Update: There have been remarks suggesting that the raw data has not been made available. My advice to Liz Gunn and the whistleblower would be to anonymize and then publish the raw data set. If you know them, please let them know. Otherwise, this story is not as credible as it seems!
We shall wait and see what happens.

Update 2: Raw data will be made available during(or after) Steve Kirsch presentation at MIT tomorrow. Here is the rumble link.

Update 3: The data is available for download at Steve Kirsch’s substack below.

Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Data from US Medicare and the New Zealand Ministry of Health shows, beyond any doubt, that the COVID vaccines have killed millions

Executive summary Today you will get to see the data that nobody wants you to see. FINALLY. No State or country has ever released record-level public health data on any vaccine. Privacy is not the reason for this; the data can be easily obfuscated (which we did on this data) so that no record entry would match that of any person, living or dead…

Read more

a day ago · 148 likes · 22 comments · Steve Kirsch

Thank you for reading PharmaFiles by Aussie17. This post is public so feel free to share it.

[Jane Long]

That evil witch accomplished her likely HIGHLY paid job.

[grey_whiskers]

Warning:

both Jikkyleaks and Igor Chudov have called these numbers out as inaccurate.

Chudov: https://twitter.com/ichudov/status/1730746211777253872
Jukkyleaks: https://x.com/jikkyleaks/status/1730391498796236924

Source: NatalieBiden on patriots.win

NatalieBiden 12 points 3 hours ago +14 / -2
Be careful with this data.

I am now a 100% covid vax skeptic.

But every trustworthy scientist I follow says the data is Bullshit.

edit:

This is to discredit legitimate vaccine concerns (remember 5G and Graphene?)

https://x.com/nickhudsonct/status/1730516759797444717

https://x.com/profnfenton/status/1730539230890176757

https://x.com/lawhealthtech/status/1730326063832867108

https://x.com/jikkyleaks/status/1730391498796236924

“ Nah. It’s a set up. They made it too obvious. People have located the guy. He’s not a whistleblower at all.

Check the red flags I posted earlier”

https://x.com/ichudov/status/1730746211777253872

“This video by Kim Dotcom reports that 21% of people receiving “Batch 1” died.

However, the numbers do not match the leaked database, as the next slide will show.”

2nd Note: apparently Jikkyleaks is “resting her account”.

https://twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1720019216433320420

[moonhawk]

More like fear of prosecution.

[Secret Agent Man]

For some, ie those involved vaxxing people, or passing laws, certainly. But I meant just in general, all the people and herd mentallity behind it. Most people for all this, had no power and no authority to do anything personally.

[Alvin Diogenes]

Of course — it could easily be a real name.

[Rdct29]

If this is true it looks like they used the vaccine to kill off part of the population. It explains how Bill gates is pro vaccine and in favor of population control. Nothing would surprise me anymore.

[Candor7]

Gene based Euthanasia , thanks tp Klaus Schwab.

The human genome is now compromised.

Birth defects in the second generation?

[Adder]

from opposition to vaccines on principle.

Nor are the vast majority of people. I oppose Wuhan vaccines based on these very mortality rates which have always been rumored to exist but are now shown to be real.

[Well that plus a streak of oppositional defiance to people trying to mandate I do something I suspect is agenda driven....]

[RouxStir]

Covid...One of the largest scams in human history!

...and still ongoing!

[grey_whiskers]

–NatalieBiden 0 points 11 hours ago +2 / -2
This guy goes through the data problems :

https://x.com/ichudov/status/1730628286009483722

Data is incomplete and doesn’t suggest a 21% died. But 12%

[moonhawk]

Got it. Thanks.

[CheshireTheCat]

Thanks for posting.

I have seen and posted about this very thing, but your article is far superior.

[CheshireTheCat]

A large part of that .75% might be just the number of people you would expect to die within a given point of time anyway.

I mean, a certain number of people who are 80 years old today will die this year and that number is higher than the people who are 40 years old today.

[CheshireTheCat]

Good catch.

[CheshireTheCat]

Okay, so there might be something to these figures after all.

We must wait a bit until the smart people get a chance to dissect this and report.

Given the revelations with contamination that have been revealed, it stands to reason some batches had more contamination with something or other than others.

[scrabblehack]

Wasn’t that the mortality rate with no vaccine?

[Texas Fossil]

Don’t think so.

[Texas Fossil]

There are stats from Life Insurance records indicating excess mortality at all age groups.

The correlation between that and large percentage of vaccination, that cannot be dismissed. The pattern follows the injection rate for specific time format.

[grey_whiskers]

The human genome is now compromised.

Birth defects in the second generation?

Worse than that.

https://archive.is/2023.03.19-212551/https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1637273646212448257.html

Read it and all the links.

Money quotes:

"In that study the fetal loss rate DOUBLED (4.2% to 9.8%) but had little impact on the overall number of fetuses."

= = = = =

"So you exclude the lost fetuses due to drug toxicity and then produce a plate in your study that shows that the fetuses that managed to avoid toxicity were the ones with the lowest drug transfer."

= = = = =

"And remember when they told you "it stays in the arm" and denied it goes to the ovary?"

"You tell me whether they lied."

"Look at the signal in the ovaries on A4 and B5."

= = = = =

"And if you thought that was dramatic, wait till you see the uterus."

"This is what a mouse uterus looks like. Like a lucky horsehoe."

"Look at the signal in A4 and B5."

"Lucky it doesn't get to the fetus eh?"

= = = = =

"NB: The LNPs referenced in these papers may be different from those in the mRNA COVID vaccines (we may never know), but they are all related compounds and designed for transfection of miRNA and mRNA."

My comment:

No WONDER Pfizer wanted to drag out the release of their documents on the clot shots for up to 75 years while assigning a skeleton crew (no pun) to review them before release...

[CheshireTheCat]

I agree with you that there is an ample data to show that the vaxseems are a problem.

All I am saying is that there is some baseline, .75 of a percentage point, that you would expect to die after a vaccine because this is the percentage of people, even if there were never any vaccines, who would have died in any given period of time anyway.

It is the high number of deaths above baseline expectations that is troubling, especially since it is kept so secret by the media.