https://twitter.com/leslibless/status/1729637573792764060
Posted on 11/27/2023 8:06:28 PM PST by UMCRevMom@aol.com
Update from Ukraine | Ruzzia was forced to retreat from their positions in Avdiivka Glory to Ukraine
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQ4DooVD8i0
The summary of the situation of Russian re-invasion to Ukraine covering the recent developments on the battlefield, as of 22nd November 2023 – 22:00 (Kyiv time). https://militaryland.net/news/invasion-day-637-summary/
[NOTE: two summaries per week, released on Wednesday and Sunday]
*** Great interactive maps with viewer controlled Map magnification tool to use for each Front!
https://militaryland.net/maps/
Lol! Yeah, and we’re the ones who are messed up for mocking that little, degenerate scumbag. Right.
What is it with these zeepers thinking they have a right to push their prattling word salads into our faces? I laugh at how indignant they get if we ask them not to ping us or post to us.
I personally don’t want a lot of odious garbage that I’m not going to read crapping up my “New Posts to You” feed.
In real life, I’m not going to let some stranger spew his or her leftist BS in my face. Why on earth do I want to read the ramblings of some obsessed bloviator with whom I will never agree?
These clowns have the right to blather on about whatever gets them all excited. And I support their right to blather.
They do not, however, have the right to be heard.
Telling certain zeepers not to ping me or not to post to me is akin to choosing not to watch CNN or MSNBC.
These people. LOL
The propaganda ministry for the Ukraine has estimated mortality for Russians so excessively that it’s unintentionally humorous. No,the Ukrainians still aren’t telling the truth.
This mombot op is all ghouls bathed in blood.
This mombot account should be zotted as such propaganda once was when this place was run by different management.
JR is clearly out of the picture and the kids want the $$.
Zot mombot or no $$$.
As far as I can tell, she wasn't throwing real money around - she was throwing fake money around.
The way I see it this isn't a financial scandal, just a classic tacky but very normal way "nouveau riche" Eastern Europeans shamelessly - and boorishly - flaunt their new found (ahem) wealth. "I am reech! I am reeechh!!! And you, dahhlling, are not!"
I have witnessed this type of posturing by such people. It is truly embarrassing, pathetic and cringeworthy.
I know of no "straight" man who could bring himself to do things like that, under any circumstance. It's just so damn degenerate, undignified - and totally gay.
The bottom line? I think the little grifter goes both ways, which in my way of thinking doesn't make one "bisexual," it just means you're a fraud - and gay.
There is no way a guy who does crap like this doesn't eat corn "the long way." Just no way.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Update from Ukraine | Ruzzia was forced to retreat from their positions in Avdiivka Glory to Ukraine, Rocco DiPippo wrote: Man, watching the way that little fruit Zelenskyyy minces and prances in the grocery store when he walks around naked in it, I cannot help but think that he really is an "in the closet" homosexual. I'm serious. The clincher is how comfortable and fluid he is while prancing around in heels and leather and grabbing and slapping mens' butts like a Folsom Street flamer in heat. I know of no "straight" man who could bring himself to do things like that, under any circumstance. It's just so damn degenerate, undignified - and totally gay.
The bottom line? I think the little grifter goes both ways, which in my way of thinking doesn't make one "bisexual," it just means you're a fraud - and gay.
There is no way a guy who does crap like this doesn't eat corn "the long way." Just no way.
Agreed. I read up on him and it seems that he was a toy boy of a Russian Oligarch. Oh the irony!That seems to be why he rose from (bad)actor/(lame)comedian to 'President' so swiftly.
When I first started posting that high heels gif, the Ukies ridiculed me for being too unsophisticated to recognize 'exotic dancing' and 'comedy', with on of them condescendingly spelling out the word comedy for me as if sounding it out for a child. But straight men and women would not call that exotic dancing or comedy.
Another condescending Yukie stressed "It was a Television broadcast!", like that means it's 'genuine' entertainment. To me it just meant that gay content is broadcast on Television in the Ukraine, same as the US.
I think the last attempt they made was to scold me for not recognizing an obvious parody that was wildly popular in the Ukraine. They stressed that the 'joke,' which I can't find in the dance because I'm heterosexual, was that these men were supposedly tough, manly Cossacks, but then they strip down to dance in heels. That's not designed to be funny to straight people, who become uncomfortable quickly.
At most the concept in general (contrasting overtly tough with shimmying in sequines) would be a brief sight gag (a glimpse just short enough to expose unimportant or minor character (a movie 'extra' or walk on) who was never the continuous center of attention, and who was never the central theme of an extended bump and grind gay dance with the camera focusing on hands grabbing buttocks or panning lovingly over body parts and facial expressions of sexual ecstasy.
Zelensky leads a lewd high heels dance that is to be 'enjoyed' as parody and more importantly, sexual titillation. There are many ways a 'tough guy' could break character for laughs, but this one features Zelensky lolling his tongue at the camera while mincing in high heels and grabbing backsides - again, for what seems like eternity to straight viewers.
That clip is a sexual parody designed and performed for gays find funny or sexually titillating. It portrays gay men dancing in a manner they have reason to believe will 'entertain' other gay men.
The Simpson's Television cartoon used this same humor theme, but from a straight heterosexual perspective. Homer takes his son to a steel mill to make sure he becomes manly enough to never be gay. The tough guy steel workers hear the whistle signal the end of the shift, the foreman says, "We work hard, we play hard," and then the men drop their construction equipment, strobe lights drop from the ceiling andthey begin a brief 'gay dance' shot from a distance and designed to make them look silly, not sexy.
The humor is in contrasting a (silly paranoid) dad taking his son to a steel mill to 'man up' and discovering that his example for his son is the opposite of what he intended. Homer is silly in his excessive reaction, screams of horror; the gay dancing workers scene helps expose Homer's ignorant belief that if he doesn't take his son to 'see manly men' in a steel mill, he may become gay. He's over the top in his horror when the men start dancing, as if he fears that witnessing the scene may make his son gay. Absurdity, mockery, comedy.
A longer clip at the link: Ajax Gay Steel Mill
The dancing workers scene lasts 13 seconds, out of an episode total of 20+ minutes, and is a small part of a larger plot in an episode focusing on Homer's ignorance and relationship with his son. In Zelensky's clips of nudity in he grocery store or heels/dancing, his sexual sequined writhing in stilettos, or nude body, are the primary centers of attention (he's usually front and center in the field of view), with his his other naked or writhing gay peers playing second by their spacing in shots, in those scenes that go on and on and on (sexual titillation rather than plot point).
So yes, Zelensky's gay, naturally lewd and is a sexual exhibitionist, just like Churchill.
Wow. I can’t argue against the conclusion of your takedown of the little gay-dancing grifter. Extremely well thought out, and utterly convincing. After reading your analysis, I went back and watched Finookskyyyyy’s gay dancing routine with your assessment in mind. You absolutely nailed him.
Our Putinistas refuse to acknowledge that there is no real evidence of US tax dollars going to purchase any yachts for anyone.
But you guys are so desperate to find something -- anything -- you can throw to smear Ukraine and its elected leadership, you grasp onto every piece of nonsense flowing out of the Kremlin's propaganda sewer pipes.
The real question is, "Did he actually buy the yachts with any money from anywhere?"
If that question's answer is "yes," then it shows an insensitivity and/or misplaced priorities during Ukraine's efforts to repulse Russia's invasion. IWO, very bad optics IMO.
No, it's complete nonsense, and typical of pro-Russian propagandists who are incapable of reasoned conversation.
The answer to it is simple and obvious -- in WWII we allied with arguably the world's second biggest mass murderer (Stalin) in order to defeat the world's greatest mass murderer (Hitler).
Does that make us guilty of, or complicit in, Stalin's mass murders?
No, of course not, but necessities of war can make for some pretty strange allies.
And while we're speaking of Stalin the Mass Murderer, who do you think has been glorifying Old Uncle Joe Stalin these past 20+ years?
Do you need a hint?
OK, I'll tell you, it's Vlad the Invader, Russia's new dictator, glorifying Old Uncle Joe for... for what?
Yes, for restoring the old Russian/Soviet Empire to it's peaks of glory, both before and during WWII.
So, let's look at our lineup of opposing forces.
On the Eastern-Eurasia side we have The New Axis of Evil:
Right, because mocking is what you've got, Mocker is who you are, and to mock is what you live for.
You are a man with a mocker-hammer and you are in search of nails you can use your mock-hammer on.
Reasoned conversation is beyond you, forming facts and logic into arguments is not what you do.
But mocking personal attacks, oh yeah, that's our man, Mocker DiPippo.
As for your quote from SpeedyinTexas, you've ignored the most important point here, which is that your buddy, your pal, your ally, Vlad the Invader, is the only one threatening nuclear war over Ukraine.
And that is the same threat the Old Soviets held over the Western World until the USSR's collapse in 1991.
We did not accept those threats then and should not accept them now.
Key point -- if Vlad the Invader thinks he can simply threaten nuclear war and then just walk into whichever country he wants to conquer next, then there will never be an end to.
So it's not really about your quote from SpeedyinTexas, but rather it's about the fact that at some point in time good people have to stand up and say "no" to Vlad the Invader's nuclear threats, possibly in the words we first heard from that crazy Virginian in 1775.
But, for a man like you, whose only mental tool is a mocking-hammer, none of that makes any sense, I'm sure.
I mean, how are you going to mock Patrick Henry?
You said it, "messed up for mocking"!
Those aren't the words I'd use, but close enough.
My words would be "limited" and "specialist", since you only have that one tool, mocking, in your intellectual tool box, only the one mocking-weapon in your arguments' arsenal, it's your go-to for every occasion, so you rely on it, over-rely on it regardless of how useful, or not.
None of your long-winded, turgid, horribly boring screeds can change that.
But. . . (drum roll please and cymbal crash!) I have some good news for you! I created a flattering portrait of you and I post it below for your enjoyment!
The term has been posited since last year, "Putinista." Might one return the favor? Putinistas are posited by the Zelensky-istas....
Let us consider if there are any threads posted like unto UMCRevMom, by listing some direct albeit fictional correlations:
Update from Russia | Glory to Russia (uploaded from Switzerland) < s a r c >Looking through the Free Republic forum, there are no such threads posted. So the asserted "Putinistas" seem to missing a bet....
"Pray for Russia" graphics < s a r c >
President Vladimir Putin - Official website < s a r c >
Operational information of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Russia < s a r c >
Ministry of Defense of Russia < s a r c >
First Deputy Prime Minister of Russia and Minister of Economy of Russia < s a r c >
Article -- Russia Today < s a r c >
VIDEO COMMENTARY -- Reporting from Russia (Alabama) < s a r c >
Refusing that there are more than two stances -- pro-Z or pro-P -- is a rhetorical game with a clear objective. To silence or at least dull criticism of the demonstrably corrupt Zelensky regime, for once upon a time "regime change" in Ukraine was desired (Nuland and her "F**k Europe" diplomacy, the continuation of Obama and Biden and the deep state goals), but "regime change" in Ukraine is no longer desired.
Not as long as the grift can be sustained.
I don't care to read your long-winded, insidious and deceptive pro-Youke, leftist/globalist blather.
Stop pinging me, and the other Freepers who have also repeatedly asked you to stop doing that.
Given how that peon butchered the spelling yet seems to write in Youcraynian just fine, I'll guess they've never spoken or written Italian.
So, if there's a next time, they should stickn to threatening non-Youkazoids by saying things like, "You remove that politsknia right now or I'll glonitskya babluskinitski and vlitynaya you instantly! Got it, you damn klunuskitynapolitsianayablubla? Good!? Slavo U Craynee!!! No CCCP 2.0!!!"
Aaaand coffee on the keyboard. 😂😂
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
