Posted on 11/19/2023 10:45:52 AM PST by grey_whiskers
Myocarditis Thrombosis Thrombocytopenia Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Vasculitis Guillain-Barré Syndrome Lymphadenopathy Anaphylaxis Myopericarditis Allergic Reactions Bell’s Palsy Axillary Adenopathy Pericarditis Acute Myelitis Perimyocarditis Intracerebral Haemorrhage Immune-Mediated Hepatitis Facial Nerve Palsy Neurological Symptoms Haemorrhage Immune-Mediated Disease Outbreaks Takotsubo cardiomyopathy Cardiac Rhabdomyolysis Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Cardiovascular events Acute Hyperactive Encephalopathy Acute Kidney Injury Multiple Sclerosis Bleeding Episodes Cutaneous Adverse Effects Skin Reactions Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome Capillary Leak Syndrome Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Petechiae Purpura Annularis Telangiectodes Pulmonary Embolism Psoriasis Nephrotic Syndrome Bullous Drug Eruption Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis Pulmonary Embolism Blood Clots Thrombophilia iTTP episode Refractory Status Epilepticus Central Serous Retinopathy Cutaneous Reactions Prion Disease Pregnant Woman Process-Related Impurities CNS Inflammation CNS Demyelination Orofacial Brain Haemorrhage Varicella Zoster Virus Nerve And Muscle Adverse Events Oculomotor Paralysis Parsonage-Turner Syndrome Acute Macular Neuroretinopathy Lipschütz ulcers (Vaginal ulcers) Amyotrophic Neuralgia Polyarthralgia Thyroiditis Keratolysis (Corneal Melting) Arthritis Thymic hyperplasia Tolosa-Hunt Syndrome Hailey-Hailey Disease Acute Lympholysis Interstitial Lung Disease Vesiculobullous Cutaneous Reactions Hematologic Conditions Hemolysis Headache Acute Coronary Syndrome ANCA Glomerulonephritis Neurologic Phantosmia Uveitis Pathophysiologic Alterations Inflammatory Myositis Still’s Disease Pityriasis Rosea Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia Sweet’s Syndrome Sensorineural Hearing Loss Serious Adverse Events Among Health Care Professionals Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Ocular Adverse Events Depression Pancreas Allograft Rejection Acute Hemichorea-Hemibalismus Alopecia Areata Graves’ Disease Cardiovascular Events Metabolic Syndrome Eosinophilic Dermatosis Hypercoagulability Neuroimaging Findings in Post COVID-19 Vaccination Urticaria Central Vein Occlusion Thrombophlebitis Squamous Cell Carcinoma Chest Pain Acute Inflammatory Neuropathies Brain Death Kounis Syndrome Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma Gastroparesis Asthma Safety Monitoring of the Janssen Vaccine Myocardial Injury Autoimmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases Neurological Autoimmune Diseases V-REPP Herpes Simplex Virus Related Material
to places like sciencedirect.org (Elsevier), PubMed, JAMAnetwork.com, nejm.org, and so forth.
I got everything, man.
I got everything, man.
Nothing I can do, man.
I can’t even sue, man.
But wait! It’s safe and effective. /s
bookmark
The first one I selected:
Item 1, Paper #2
Conclusions
We report a case series of probable hypersensitivity myocarditis with consistent temporal association to receipt of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. While the true incidence of this adverse event is unknown at this time, the presentation pattern and clinical course suggest an association with an inflammatory response to vaccination. Increased attention to myocarditis as a potential adverse event following immunization is warranted. Recognition of the substantial morbidity associated with COVID-19 infection, including risk of cardiac injury, and the strong effectiveness of immunization in preventing infection provide important context for this topic. Concerns about rare adverse events following immunization should not diminish overall confidence in the value of vaccination.
Hi Troll.
Now do the other 227 papers.
Keep track of when the papers were published, too: clotshot side effects are increasing over time.
Suck it dry.
“Hi Troll.”
I just quoted from your link.
This is two years later. You know, as Pfauci's grip is slipping; and as even normies have begun to figure out we're not all dropping down dead of COVID anymore. IBTZ
“Now do the other 227 papers.”
That was #2. Here is #1:
The authors seek not to frustrate vaccination efforts, but rather to prepare patients and providers for a rare but potential adverse effect. Furthermore, the authors hope the dramatic improvement in all four patients will reassure those who do suffer from myocarditis following vaccination.
You cherry picked from one of the earliest papers, without acknowledging the early date.
And pretending that such was necessarily representative of everything.
Troll.
“You cherry picked from one of the earliest papers, without acknowledging the early date.”
LOL! I went to the first two on their list. By topic.
Your quote now disproves forever, your and Dingbat's claim that the only people talking about adverse events are kooks with an agenda to scare people off from the shots, so that they can make money on their own alternative products.
Nice own goal there, moron.
Troll.
“And pretending that such was necessarily representative of everything.”
I only quoted from the articles. Nothing more.
Oh, then you admit your cherry-picking has no evidentiary value other than your own propaganda purposes?
Well, maybe by 200 years from now you'll have climbed the moral ladder all the way up to shifty.
It's a start.
There's your lie. You cherry picked from the 2nd article; then when it was pointed out both that one article was not representative, and was one of the earliest ones, you then cherry picked from the first article.
I take back the complement. I had such high hopes for you, too.
“Oh, then you admit your cherry-picking has no evidentiary value other than your own propaganda purposes?”
I selected the first two on their list. That is not cherry-picking.
#3: Conclusions and relevance: In this small case series study, myocarditis was diagnosed in children after COVID-19 vaccination, most commonly in boys after the second dose. In this case series, in short-term follow-up, patients were mildly affected.
a) you only quoted a line or two carefully selected out of all the contents of all the articles, to give the impression that the side effects were minor
b) this was misleading because both the understanding of the side effects, and the number of them that happened, have only increased over time
c) You carefully didn't mention you picked from two of the earliest papers
d) You carefully avoided both quoting from later papers, and any quotes describing the physical mechanism of the side effects -- because doing so WOULD deter people from the clot shots -- on a rigorous, SCIENTIFIC™! basis -- which would undermine the central thesis of you $hot $hills the all opposition to the jabs is either emotionalism or grifting.
TROLL!
So even with a small study and limited follow-up, myocarditis was identified.
So the only POSSIBLE conclusion according to you trolls is "There could never have been any such thing as risk, and it is forever disproven for all age and risk cohorts!"
Troll.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.