“And pretending that such was necessarily representative of everything.”
I only quoted from the articles. Nothing more.
Oh, then you admit your cherry-picking has no evidentiary value other than your own propaganda purposes?
Well, maybe by 200 years from now you'll have climbed the moral ladder all the way up to shifty.
It's a start.
There's your lie. You cherry picked from the 2nd article; then when it was pointed out both that one article was not representative, and was one of the earliest ones, you then cherry picked from the first article.
I take back the complement. I had such high hopes for you, too.