Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oregon bill would allow homeless people to sue residents if they are 'harassed'
Washington Examiner ^ | 4/28/23 | Brady Knox

Posted on 04/29/2023 4:28:29 AM PDT by Libloather

Oregon Democrats have put forth a bill that would allow homeless people to sue residents for "harassment."

House Bill 3501, also known as the Right to Rest Act, would allow aggrieved parties to sue for $1,000 for each incident of harassment. It would also decriminalize homeless camps. The bill comes after several years of a worsening homelessness crisis, and many residents complain of harassment and improper behavior on the part of the homeless population in cities such as Portland.

The bill blames homelessness on "economic hardship, a shortage of safe and affordable housing, the inability to obtain gainful employment and a disintegrating social safety net system." It argues that decriminalizing homeless encampments would allow the state to redirect resources toward the "root causes of homelessness and poverty."

"It is declared to be the public policy of Oregon to guarantee persons experiencing homelessness participation in the social and economic life of this state, remunerative employment, use of and free movement within public spaces, participation in and receipt of the benefits of the services, programs and activities of state government and local governments and housing accommodations of the person’s choice, without discrimination," the bill reads.

It defines harassment as a "knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a person experiencing homelessness that a reasonable person would consider as seriously alarming, tormenting or terrorizing of the person experiencing homelessness." It does not consider the vice versa of homeless people harassing residents - something many have complained about.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; Local News
KEYWORDS: harassed; homeless; oregon; sue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Libloather

Headline should read Oregon democrats encourage shooting the homeless.
At least that’s what they seem to want.


21 posted on 04/29/2023 5:49:45 AM PDT by GranTorino (Bloody Lips Save Ships.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper

I’m sure the Dems people voted for in Seattle, San Franfreako, Los Angeles and other places along the Left Coast will move to codify this into their own existing codes (aka ‘laws’).


22 posted on 04/29/2023 5:54:58 AM PDT by Tom Tetroxide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I bet those property values in Porkland and other places around the State are just going to increase like never before!


23 posted on 04/29/2023 5:56:57 AM PDT by Tom Tetroxide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

“And how are these economic hardship cases supposed to afford an attorney for what I am assuming would be a civil case?”

National Lawyers Guild, ACLU or some other anarchist organization will represent them free of charge.


24 posted on 04/29/2023 6:11:01 AM PDT by willk (Local news media. Just as dangerous as national media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Oh! There won’t be any collusion there! LMAO!


25 posted on 04/29/2023 6:11:41 AM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

It will be a big wildfire season in Oregon if this passes. So many fires started by the homeless.


26 posted on 04/29/2023 6:13:12 AM PDT by willk (Local news media. Just as dangerous as national media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I heard this bill summed up another way. It turns what people consider public into private. In public, like a sidewalk or park, you have no expectation of privacy. It’s public after all. Privacy is the opposite. Thus, things people do in private such as bathing, using the toilet, having sex and so on are all now legal. Stopping someone who is homeless from doing these things is now illegal. The police cannot stop them.


27 posted on 04/29/2023 6:32:22 AM PDT by ConservativeInPA ("How did you go bankrupt?" Bill asked. "Two ways," Mike said. "Gradually and then suddenly." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

So how does this work ???

A homeless guy comes into my property and I tell him to leave

That’s harassment ???

What if I say I’ll call the police ???

Have I committed a felony ???

Yeah probably


28 posted on 04/29/2023 6:32:30 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Draper
just ‘casually observing’ human nature.

Seems to me that government has just devolved from being the arbiter of human nature to choosing sides - the side opposing property rights. Government no longer has standing to enforce laws.

29 posted on 04/29/2023 6:45:40 AM PDT by ConservativeInPA ("How did you go bankrupt?" Bill asked. "Two ways," Mike said. "Gradually and then suddenly." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“How many of the homeless have attorneys?”

They’ll have as many as they want - funded by you.


30 posted on 04/29/2023 6:58:46 AM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how thery control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

Squatting on another’s property for a long time legally conveys ownership. The government wants to prevent people from protecting their ownership. Wouldn’t this be an unconstitutional “taking”?

/\

This is the heart of the matter.

Defacto elimination of private property.

If you can’t control who is on your property

there IS NO private property.


31 posted on 04/29/2023 6:59:07 AM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
There are hordes of "public service" lawyers would do this pro bono just to create chaos
32 posted on 04/29/2023 7:02:42 AM PDT by jmcenanly (You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.” ― Winston)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

“And how are these economic hardship cases supposed to afford an attorney for what I am assuming would be a civil case?”

There will be plenty of “homeless advocates organizations” that will eagerly provide “free” lawyers... that you end up paying for.


33 posted on 04/29/2023 7:02:48 AM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how thery control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Whatever you reward you get more of, whatever you punish you get less of. This bill will guarantee more “homeless” and less productive tax paying citizens.

Go for it Oregon, you have not hit bottom, yet!


34 posted on 04/29/2023 7:07:02 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The best term to describe the USA today is FUBAR


35 posted on 04/29/2023 7:09:57 AM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

It’s a short step from there to declaring home ownership as an affront to the homeless. Then the the homeless will go all Dr. Zhivago on every property. Fun times.


36 posted on 04/29/2023 7:10:06 AM PDT by Noumenon (You're not voting your way out of this. KTF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
the inability to obtain gainful employment

Because they bring almost no skills to the job market, and/or they drink and drug it up to the point where they are completely unreliable if they are employed.

37 posted on 04/29/2023 7:15:13 AM PDT by libertylover (Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

“here’s your $5k bill for your civil penalty and write a check to the homeless person for $1k...”

I’ve always wondered if 50 IQ noodle-arm leftists who can’t find the bathroom would know how to defend against shoot, shovel and shutup.


38 posted on 04/29/2023 7:22:23 AM PDT by sergeantdave (AI is the next iteration of a copy and paste machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

Amen to that, brother.


39 posted on 04/29/2023 7:48:59 AM PDT by Don Draper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“Should go both ways, no?”

Even if it did, suing someone who is already destitute isn’t going to accomplish anything.


40 posted on 04/29/2023 7:57:04 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson