Posted on 04/28/2023 1:08:50 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Now, a royal insider is making an explosive new claim: Diana cheated first. In the upcoming documentary “King Charles: The Boy Who Walked Alone,” premiering on May 2 on Paramount+, several ex-girlfriends and former staffers spill new secrets about the royal family, ahead of the monarch’s May 6 coronation.
Allan Peters, a former royal protection officer who worked with the family for nine years, appears in the documentary to share his perspective on Charles and Diana’s marriage, which lasted from 1981 until the famously unhappy pair separated in 1992 and divorced in 1996.
“I can categorically say that the first person who strayed in the marriage was the Princess of Wales,” Peters revealed.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Why does one even care, one way or the other?
Diana was a decent young lady and if she did then she just did and she was married to a ****stick anyway.
Why spatter it on her headstone?
I don’t think any of them, including her, were decent. I don’t really care, but for some reason, a lot of U.S., including Freepers worship them.
There’s an awful lot of hyperbole on FR these days...
I don’t ‘worship’ anyone or anything except God. But there are lots of institutions I value for the good they’ve given to the world and to their cultures.
Nothing involving men is free from fault; but even faulty men can do great good.
Ditto.
I didn’t say you worshipped them. But there are people who think they are better than us people from the U.S. It’s their right to believe that. They seem to think we were on the wrong side in 1776.
So; Prince Harry?
Not a personal fan of Charles at all
But supporting a wife for “infidelity first” is not a conservative value. Anyone who feels this way, you’re not a comservative. Much less a Christian.
What do you mean, “supporting a wife for infidelity first?”
“I don’t think she was a commoner”
No she was Lady Diana Spencer, daughter to the Earl of Spencer. Her bloodlines were bluer than Charles.
While I don’t support divorce, it was obvious from the very beginning that Charles was never in love with her and carried a torch for Camilla...as it is claimed by Dianna that she overheard Charles on the evening prior to their marriage talking to Camilla on the phone, admitting his love for her alone. Camilla. Imagine living with that knowledge?
I can’t imagine the desperation that she felt, the betrayal, and feeling locked into a marriage that was loveless? Camilla, due to her husband’s “rank” was at many state events and I’m sure Charles took full advantage to talk to her as much as possible. and it was often rumored that he spent more time at Camilla’s side than with his wife at these events. It was also stated that she’d tried to get out of the engagement, but was admonished to stay and do her duty. She was a lot younger than Charles. I always felt that she was in a place between a rock and a hard place. No good option.
She wasn’t in love with him either. But such marriages were never about love, were they?
I think she was naive, spoiled, and pretty much an airhead. Charles is a tool but I’m sure she bored him to tears. If she had been middle class in the US she’d have probably been talked into giving BJ’s to the football team behind the bleachers when she was 15. I don’t find much to admire in any of them. The only ones worth anything died over the last couple of years. The ones now are just well dressed trailer trash.
Who are those people? The last time I heard a royal even mention the Revolution was done in jest, when, many years ago, the Queen spoke of ‘misplacing the colonies’.
And then there is this - Britain is our greatest ally, and our countries historically owe one another greatly, even up to the current century:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILT8MxadD1Q
They have been an ally, but they have usually swindled us.
FDR allowed the United States to be totally used and abused in WWII.
And they completely sold us out to the Soviet Union. The U.K. was a funnel of information to the Soviets. The head of the MI5 in the 50s and 60s was a Russian mole.
Again, who are the ‘US people’ who think that we were wrong to revolt?
I’ve never encountered one, in RL or on FR.
I win’t arrgue your point? because I did not speak ‘of values’
I spoke that here in America, although drooled and fantasized by yhe media, there exists no monarchy.
I wasn’t discussing whether we currently have ‘monarchy’ or not.
I was objecting to your statement that you were ‘independent of any slime of royalty.’
History is history; and cultures grow out of other ones.
Read the other peoples comments giving their approval she cheated “first”.
...this late-breaking news from the people who brought you Bunker Hill.
I’d wager that this isn’t true. First,British royal men have a history of infidelity going back centuries...and second,Camilla Parker Bowles.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.