Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Georgia Girl 2
She was a commoner. You’re either royalty or you’re a commoner. Her father the Earl of Spencer was not royalty, therefore a commoner. Nobility, unless they’re also royals, are still commoners.

I think she was naive, spoiled, and pretty much an airhead. Charles is a tool but I’m sure she bored him to tears. If she had been middle class in the US she’d have probably been talked into giving BJ’s to the football team behind the bleachers when she was 15. I don’t find much to admire in any of them. The only ones worth anything died over the last couple of years. The ones now are just well dressed trailer trash.

72 posted on 04/28/2023 3:56:13 PM PDT by GaryCrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: GaryCrow

Princess Diana’s family are titled nobility and she had more royal blood in her veins than Charles. Her bloodlines run back to Charles 11. When Charles married Diana he married up.

I’m Irish so I don’t care if they live or die but factually the English aristocracy are not commoners and most carry some royal blood.


86 posted on 04/28/2023 8:57:09 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson