Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We used to have steam-powered cars. What happened to them — and will they come back?
FreeThink ^ | April 9, 2023 | By Matt Benoit

Posted on 04/10/2023 10:56:50 AM PDT by Red Badger

Steam cars hit the U.S. market in the 1890s but were largely extinct by the 1930s. Will technology bring them back?

Credit: Huw Williams (Huwmanbeing) / Wikipedia / Public Domain

Imagine going out to your garage or driveway to get into your car. But instead of keys to get it started, you’ll be using matches or a blowtorch, because your car has a pilot light. For those who owned steam-powered automobiles in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, this was a daily reality. Before Henry Ford’s Model T revolutionized the affordability of internal combustion engines for Americans, steam-powered vehicles had their day in the sun.

These cars, though inconvenient by modern standards, produced less pollution than their gas-driven counterparts, set world land speed records, and were owned by the likes of Howard Hughes. So what happened to them?

The golden age of steam cars Steam engines work by means of external combustion, meaning fuel is combusted outside the engine to heat water and create steam, which is then transferred to the engine’s pistons, which move rods and cranks that transfer power to axles and wheels. Jay Leno, the late night comedian and famous car enthusiast who owns a 1925 Doble E-20 Steam Car once owned by Howard Hughes, said steam power so efficiently produced torque that it was referred to as “the hand of God.”

By the time commercially available steam cars hit U.S. markets in the 1890s, the world was already well-acquainted with steam engines: They propelled powerful locomotives and passenger boats across the globe.

From around 1900 until shortly after World War I, steam was a popular choice of automobile. Steam cars were less dangerous than gasoline engines that required strenuous hand-cranking to start and had further range than early electric cars. They were also very low-emission compared to early internal combustion engines, more reliable, and often quieter. American manufacturers were plentiful: Locomobile, Baldwin, Stanley, White, and Doble, among others.

The steam car also had sheer speed: many early Stanley models could travel 75 mph (121 kph), and some could go much faster.

In January 1906, a Stanley-built steam car showed up on the sandy beaches of Ormond Beach, Florida. Driven by Fred Marriott, the two-cylinder, 50-horsepower vehicle set a world land speed record of 127.66 mph (205 kph) over a one-mile (1.6-km) course. Despite having less horsepower, the car’s time was at least a full second quicker than any of the gas-powered record attempts for the same distance.

Running out of steam Steam cars had their drawbacks, though. Drivers had to have a fair amount of attention on steam pressures and other gauges that diverted their attention from the simple act of driving. The dependence on boilers (and the water inside them) made the cars quite heavy, and the entire process of starting one (lighting a pilot and waiting 20 to 30 minutes to properly create steam for motion) wasn’t very convenient.

The 1899 Baldwin Steamer, for instance, took 20 minutes to get started, and its boiler needed refilling about every 20 miles. The boiler was also located under the driver’s seat, creating potentially dangerous issues if improperly maintained. As the 1920s roared along, steam cars saw some technological advancements, resulting in shortened starting times and less complexity on the driver’s part.

But as time progressed, the cost-effectiveness and convenience of gas spelled the end of commercial steam cars. Assembly line production of modern cars made gas-powered vehicles cheaper, and electric starters made hand cranking a thing of the past.

Steam car companies either adapted or died. Locomobile switched to internal combustion, as did White. Stanley went out of business in 1924, while Doble ceased production by 1931 after stock fraud allegations badly damaged its namesake’s reputation.

Picking up steam? The April 1957 issue of Road & Track asked the question: Is steam coming back? On its cover that month was the Paxton Phoenix, a rear-engine coupe prototype for which several engine packages were considered. One of them was a Doble-designed steam engine that was even tested on a dynamometer. While it was hoped this car might revive the steam dream, the project was abandoned due to cost concerns in 1954, and the car never saw production.

During the 1950s and 1960s, an engine company occasionally offered steam engine conversions for production cars, and interest was also piqued in the 1970s due to air pollution increases and energy crises. The California Highway Patrol even investigated using steam-powered patrol cars in 1969. That same year, General Motors revealed two experimental steam cars based off a converted Chevrolet Chevelle and Pontiac Grand Prix, but they were just that: experiments.

Bill Lear, the man who founded LearJet, also dabbled with both street and race cars utilizing a steam turbine in the late 1960s, but nothing much came of it. In the end, no commercial car or engine manufacturer has produced steam-driven vehicles for the general public since they fell out of favor around a century ago.

In 2008, Popular Science covered the tinkering exploits of Florida boat engineer and inventor Harry Schoell, who proposed a reinvented steam engine called “The Cyclone Green Revolution Engine.”

Schoell’s engine uses superheated steam, which makes it behave more like a liquid, helping it convert about 20% more energy into torque compared to an internal combustion engine. Despite interest from lawn mower companies and others, the engine doesn’t appear to have been considered for any legitimate road-driven purposes.

One area where steam-drive still has novelty, however, is in the breaking of world land speed records. On August 25, 2009, the 1906 steam car speed record was officially broken by the British-built Inspiration — a 25-foot-long, 12-boiler vehicle that weighs three metric tons and looks kind of like the Batmobile.

Made from a combination of carbon fiber, aluminum, and steel, the car ran an average speed of 139.843 mph (225 kph) at Edwards Air Force Base in California’s Mojave Desert. On its second run (records require the average of two runs over one mile), it reached a top speed of 151 mph (243 kph).

Today, most steam cars can be found in the collections of car collectors like Leno, or in museums like Tacoma, Washington’s LeMay Museum. They are reminders of a different time in American automotive history. Only time and technology will tell if their vogue is ever revived.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; History; Outdoors; Travel
KEYWORDS: stanleysteamer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last
To: Red Badger

I’ll be the first in line to support a coal fired automobile billowing smoke in leftists faces.


41 posted on 04/10/2023 11:24:28 AM PDT by ConservativeInPA ("How did you go bankrupt?" Bill asked. "Two ways," Mike said. "Gradually and then suddenly." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

For mobile units yes. For stationary power steam cannot be beaten.


42 posted on 04/10/2023 11:25:58 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel; joshua c

Fuel was either kerosene or gasoline for the Stanley steam car.


43 posted on 04/10/2023 11:26:32 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Nope. Absolutely false.

Thee most efficient engine made in the world is steam.

Lets see your ICE engines develop in excess of 4 to 5 thousand HP with two cylinders.

Cant do it, and you know it.


44 posted on 04/10/2023 11:26:38 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic
I miss the gentle glow of lamps fueled by whale oil.

And the warm, if scratchy, voices on the Victrola.


45 posted on 04/10/2023 11:28:46 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

https://youtu.be/wBU8IPyUyTk


46 posted on 04/10/2023 11:29:01 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true . . . I have no proof, but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

Around here one could run a great distance in a steam car powered by shredded Amazon boxes.


47 posted on 04/10/2023 11:29:10 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns

Power plants for energy. Steam. We still use it massively. Saying “nuclear” or “oil” or “coal” is just the fuel to heat up steam.

Steam engine is the greatest invention ever IMO. Massive change due to them.


48 posted on 04/10/2023 11:30:58 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

What the other guy said. Steam is THE propulsion source for energy creation.

Also think of steam locos. 2 tiny cylinders up front propel not only itself but an entire loaded train of 100 cars at honest speeds. That is serious power.


49 posted on 04/10/2023 11:33:34 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The mechanics and logistics of steam powered vehicles make them impractical. Who wants to go out on freezing morning fill the boiler with water (you did remember to drain it so it would freeze and break, didn’t you?), start a fire. wait half an hour, then refill the boiler every few miles and add more fuel? Yes, there are automatic water and fuel feeders, but they add expense and complications to the equation.

The reasons the railroads were eager to switch from steam to diesel electric were because the steam locomotives were a high maintenance item that were in constant need of work and they were dirty.


50 posted on 04/10/2023 11:34:33 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (It's science and therefore cannot be questioned!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
Absolutely, Stationary Plants generating electricity are ideal for variety of fuels and efficiency, and inclusion of pollution control technology.

Single disadvantage: Quick start up for unpredicted demand.

51 posted on 04/10/2023 11:36:03 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Celebrate Decivilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

That was gasoline-powered cars before the electric starter. You can STILL mechanically start a lot of cars, but without a handcrank, it involves pushing the car until everything is turning fast enough. I once did it with a 1998-ish Ford Taurus.


52 posted on 04/10/2023 11:38:37 AM PDT by dangus ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
Steam engine is the greatest invention ever IMO.

I can see why you say that, it got all the thinking and innovation started.

53 posted on 04/10/2023 11:40:37 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Celebrate Decivilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Sure, I’d roll-started modern cars. Stick shift, don’t know if you could do it with an auto. I’ve also crank started tractors. It’s a lot of work, and if not shown the proper respect, will break your arm. (Ford fractures were a thing in the day)


54 posted on 04/10/2023 11:41:42 AM PDT by ferret_airlift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns

Our NUCLEAR ships? Technically, I suppose Nuclear propulsion is steam-based, but I’m thinking getting regulatory feasibility might be tough.


55 posted on 04/10/2023 11:42:16 AM PDT by dangus ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

You could see a Stanley before you could hear it . . . and you could smell its owner before you could see him.


56 posted on 04/10/2023 11:44:02 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gundog

Interesting concept, by the microwave magnetron has to be powered by an electrical source, which means a generator. I suppose that a fire could start the water boiling until it could turn a generator to power a the magnetron, but the laws of thermodynamics chimes in and kicks over that sand castle with resistive and thermal and mechanical losses.


57 posted on 04/10/2023 11:44:10 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (It's science and therefore cannot be questioned!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

When mfr. tech advances to being able to consistently produce a closed vapor loop.


58 posted on 04/10/2023 11:46:47 AM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz
The number of cylinders is irrelevant.

Steam, in the configuration we are discussing (small, mobile power plants) is much less efficient, because water is a poor working fluid which is depleted as it is used to provide power.

Steam turbines, with superheated steam as a working fluid, are efficient in very large plants with access to almost unlimited water for cooling and steam replacement.

59 posted on 04/10/2023 11:48:22 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
We may someday see hybrid cars with turbine-electric engines including steam turbine-electric if the price is low enough. Steam turbine-electric engines for ships were superseded in the 1930s as the designers needed to reduce the rotations from a 3,000 rpm turbine to a 300 rpm propeller. Such mechanics added size, weight, and complexity compared to a diesel engine. With electric cars or electric propulsion ships such as the COmbined Gas-Electric-Steam (COGES) in cruise ships, the technology may be feasible in the future.

The turbine needed to power a generator for a hybrid car could very small and light weight compared to a diesel-electric or gas-electric.

60 posted on 04/10/2023 11:50:03 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson