|
Posted on 12/27/2022 8:26:32 PM PST by ransomnote
ransomnote: Remembering Biden's political prisoners in prayer this holiday season. Audio available at link.
FromChadhttps://twitter.com/DC_Draino/status/1607812774255624193
Have you seen President Trump's powerful 4 minute video message? Don't miss it!
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Yes there is. But we are kind of in uncharted waters here nicht war?
I don't see the regular standing US Armed Forces taking any overt action on behalf of the People against the established power elites.
If we are very lucky, some commanders may refuse to suppress a popular uprising involving the NG and militia. Others will be more than willing to fire on demonstrators if ordered by their superiors.
Of course, I could be wrong. It has been fifteen years since I was close to any active duty personnel, forty years since I was on active duty myself.
If you read the article.... there was one GOOD case, TX vs several states, that was a good case, and Tracy Beanz aka Diaz, co-author of article, talked about. SCOTUS rejected it as “no standing” and seh said it was a terrible decision. The “no standing” thing is of rather recent origin btw. I remember that case, sometime in 2021, and that SCOTUS wouldn’t hear it. It was a good case, I and others figured justices were threatened etc. But this case is totally different.
If they had ruled on an election case, we would have heard of the ruling by now. Any cases re: elections have either been rejecte or ruled on to my knowledge. Smaller cases involving specif state etc issues have had some ruling.
That swimsuit looks tricky to put on and take off. She wears it very well though.
She had a bathing suit on ?
The for the ping.
Tracy Beanz is on the right track, accurate in assessment, but off on a few crucial details.
I’m not in the business of creating hopium in this. On its face. Brunson Brothers looks like a no-go. But I call out some facts that appear unusual, facts that are taken as hopium, but which shouldn’t be so taken. My thesis is Brunson will fail, but so will the US Supreme Court in failing it.
On the flip-side are those that go out of their way to create doom, darkness, futility, and get facts wrong in the process. The outcome they forecast may very well come to pass, but it’s what they get wrong in the analysis that I try to fill in with facts taken with lawyers and clerks experienced in the process.
First, Beanz and her crew find the online cert app and claim that Brunson Brothers are on the docket solely because they filled out the online cert application and paid the fee (and the required docs togo along with it). Anyone can do that, right? Correct, anyone can do it.
But the Beanz argument jumps to concluding Brunson is going to conference because application was filed and fee paid.
Wrong.
They’re missing steps.
At the conference, all nine Justices and their clerks sort through the conference list of cases to review and decide which are held back, denied, which are advanced forward to a regular hearing before the Court.
Conference Hearing Determines Who Will Go To Full Hearing.
Now here’s the thing .....
The number of Appeals per year (4 terms) to the Supreme Court is on the order of about 25,000 or so, or on average about 6,000 to 8,000 cases per term.
What Beanz is missing is the upcoming conference this coming Friday is not going to have the Justices wade through thousands and thousands of cases.
This is where the Clerks come in. We can expect the Clerks have a close working relationship with the Justices. They know which fundamental issues are ripe.
The Clerks screen the thousands of cert applications and their filings before the conference convenes. This is what Beanz leaves out.
The Clerks select from thousands, a hundred or so to be reviewed at conference.
The conference will select a couple dozen cases or so, that will be scheduled for a full Supreme Court hearing.
A Clerk selected the Brunson case for conference. Brunson will be reviewed this coming Friday, and will likely along with many others not advance to a full hearing before the Court.
But ..... the fact that it even made it to conference is a bit of a shocker, especially as it had to be accepted under Rule 11 which is another mountain to climb.
So Brunson has caught the attention of many in the legal, political, world because it is thought to be so radical as to dismiss it outright. But here it’s on the conference list.
Now the above is not intended to create hopium that this case has any chance of a full hearing, let alone a favorable ruling which is considered fantasy. But it’s unsettling to the legal world how it made it this far.
What I drew attention to is the case reflects what a lot of us are concerned about. The Brunson case reflects the angst of the American people.
To me, it’s not plaintiffs or defendants who are on trial here.
The US Supreme Court is on trial.
If that new kill switch is really smart it won’t activate in front of me when I’m pulling a grade in one of my trucks. Could put a whole new meaning on “kill switch.”
There was also the stolen gold. It was quite the cover for plundering the country.
ok
Carpet munching can be a problem if the carpet has been infected by HPV. It is the general consensus that Martina enjoyed that activity. Do you need a diagram?
She may very well be Brazilian, or at least uses the Brazilian technique for carpet management.
Let met guess....the murderer was on the FIBs (or local LEO) radar.... Lone wolf, or known wolf?
What a stupid joke. .... that made me LOL.
ThanQs for the silliness.
BREAKING National ground stop for all aircraft destined to any airport in Florida
A national ground stop has been issued by the FAA for all aircraft destined to any airport in Florida.
The FAA indicated flights to and from six major airports in the southern half of Florida were suspended until further notice.
As of March 27, 2015, En Route Automation Modernization (ERAM) has replaced the 40-year-old En Route Host computer and backup system used at 20 FAA Air Route Traffic Control Centers nationwide.
ERAM technology is the heart of the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) and the pulse of the National Airspace System (NAS), helping to advance our transition from a ground-based system of air traffic control to a satellite-based system of air traffic management.
ERAM is vital to the future of air navigation, providing the foundational platform required for FAA to enable NextGen solutions, via modernization programs such as System Wide Information Management, Data Communications, and Automatic Dependent Surveillance- Broadcast.
An equipment issue is forcing the Federal Aviation Administration to order a national ground stop for Airport such as Miami Fort Lauderdale.
Air traffic control centers use the computer system En Route Automation Modernization to manage aircraft in the skies. The problem Monday stems from an ERAM issue, the FAA added.
UPDATE The FAA tells the problem is with a system at Miami Center “that is being resolved.”
UPDATE Departure delay 90 mins (and increasing) at Miami Airport.
UPDATE departures halted from Orlando, Miami and Fort Aluderdale.
Those morons are going to screw around and elect a Democrat speaker.
To: TEXOKIE; little jeremiah
The for the ping.
Tracy Beanz is on the right track, accurate in assessment, but off on a few crucial details.
I’m not in the business of creating hopium in this. On its face. Brunson Brothers looks like a no-go. But I call out some facts that appear unusual, facts that are taken as hopium, but which shouldn’t be so taken. My thesis is Brunson will fail, but so will the US Supreme Court in failing it.
On the flip-side are those that go out of their way to create doom, darkness, futility, and get facts wrong in the process. The outcome they forecast may very well come to pass, but it’s what they get wrong in the analysis that I try to fill in with facts taken with lawyers and clerks experienced in the process.
First, Beanz and her crew find the online cert app and claim that Brunson Brothers are on the docket solely because they filled out the online cert application and paid the fee (and the required docs togo along with it). Anyone can do that, right? Correct, anyone can do it.
But the Beanz argument jumps to concluding Brunson is going to conference because application was filed and fee paid.
Wrong.
They’re missing steps.
At the conference, all nine Justices and their clerks sort through the conference list of cases to review and decide which are held back, denied, which are advanced forward to a regular hearing before the Court.
Conference Hearing Determines Who Will Go To Full Hearing.
Now here’s the thing .....
The number of Appeals per year (4 terms) to the Supreme Court is on the order of about 25,000 or so, or on average about 6,000 to 8,000 cases per term.
What Beanz is missing is the upcoming conference this coming Friday is not going to have the Justices wade through thousands and thousands of cases.
This is where the Clerks come in. We can expect the Clerks have a close working relationship with the Justices. They know which fundamental issues are ripe.
The Clerks screen the thousands of cert applications and their filings before the conference convenes. This is what Beanz leaves out.
The Clerks select from thousands, a hundred or so to be reviewed at conference.
The conference will select a couple dozen cases or so, that will be scheduled for a full Supreme Court hearing.
A Clerk selected the Brunson case for conference. Brunson will be reviewed this coming Friday, and will likely along with many others not advance to a full hearing before the Court.
But ..... the fact that it even made it to conference is a bit of a shocker, especially as it had to be accepted under Rule 11 which is another mountain to climb.
So Brunson has caught the attention of many in the legal, political, world because it is thought to be so radical as to dismiss it outright. But here it’s on the conference list.
Now the above is not intended to create hopium that this case has any chance of a full hearing, let alone a favorable ruling which is considered fantasy. But it’s unsettling to the legal world how it made it this far.
What I drew attention to is the case reflects what a lot of us are concerned about. The Brunson case reflects the angst of the American people.
To me, it’s not plaintiffs or defendants who are on trial here.
The US Supreme Court is on trial.
1,384 posted on 1/2/2023, 5:12:56 PM by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1344 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Thank you, Hostage for commenting and clarifying your perspective here. I am pinging my list for the above commentary.
I recommend the article by Law Prof Tim Canova which Hostage posted recently. If you have not read it, I imho find it fascinating.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4119737/posts
What a stupid joke. .... that made me LOL.
ThanQs for the silliness.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
:-D.
We aim to please!
Hungary Exempts Mothers Under 30 from Income Tax, Seeks to Boost Births Instead of Migration
Hungary has exempted young mothers from paying income tax as it continues to expand the package of pro-family formation policies it has introduced as an alternative to mass migration.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2023/01/02/hungary-exempts-mothers-under-30-from-income-tax-seeks-to-boost-births-instead-of-migration/
Vaxicide
‘Died Suddenly’? More Than 1-in-4 Think Someone They Know Died From COVID-19 Vaccines
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that (49%) of American Adults believe it is likely that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths, including 28% who think it’s Very Likely. Thirty-seven percent (37%) don’t say a significant number of deaths have been caused by vaccine side effects, including 17% who believe it’s Not At All Likely. Another 14% are not sure.
Twenty-eight percent (28%) of adults say they personally know someone whose death they think may have been caused by side effects of COVID-19 vaccines, while 61% don’t and another 10% are not sure.
https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/public_surveys/died_suddenly_more_than_1_in_4_think_someone_they_know_died_from_covid_19_vaccines
I can't say I blame him.
BTW, I have never heard him even come close to advocating for the VAX and he has vehemently denied doing so on numerous occasions.
Calling that get-up a “swim” suit is a bit of a stretch. No way did the stringer have swimming in mind. Looks more like a cat’s cradle to me: jerk the strings and watch the button in the middle spin? I guess you’d buy one by the foot/yard/skein?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
