Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage; AFB-XYZ; ransomnote; Aquamarine; generally; Axenolith; AZLiberty; bagster; CJ Wolf; ...

To: TEXOKIE; little jeremiah
The for the ping.

Tracy Beanz is on the right track, accurate in assessment, but off on a few crucial details.

I’m not in the business of creating hopium in this. On its face. Brunson Brothers looks like a no-go. But I call out some facts that appear unusual, facts that are taken as hopium, but which shouldn’t be so taken. My thesis is Brunson will fail, but so will the US Supreme Court in failing it.

On the flip-side are those that go out of their way to create doom, darkness, futility, and get facts wrong in the process. The outcome they forecast may very well come to pass, but it’s what they get wrong in the analysis that I try to fill in with facts taken with lawyers and clerks experienced in the process.

First, Beanz and her crew find the online cert app and claim that Brunson Brothers are on the docket solely because they filled out the online cert application and paid the fee (and the required docs togo along with it). Anyone can do that, right? Correct, anyone can do it.

But the Beanz argument jumps to concluding Brunson is going to conference because application was filed and fee paid.

Wrong.

They’re missing steps.

At the conference, all nine Justices and their clerks sort through the conference list of cases to review and decide which are held back, denied, which are advanced forward to a regular hearing before the Court.

Conference Hearing Determines Who Will Go To Full Hearing.

Now here’s the thing .....

The number of Appeals per year (4 terms) to the Supreme Court is on the order of about 25,000 or so, or on average about 6,000 to 8,000 cases per term.

What Beanz is missing is the upcoming conference this coming Friday is not going to have the Justices wade through thousands and thousands of cases.

This is where the Clerks come in. We can expect the Clerks have a close working relationship with the Justices. They know which fundamental issues are ripe.

The Clerks screen the thousands of cert applications and their filings before the conference convenes. This is what Beanz leaves out.

The Clerks select from thousands, a hundred or so to be reviewed at conference.

The conference will select a couple dozen cases or so, that will be scheduled for a full Supreme Court hearing.

A Clerk selected the Brunson case for conference. Brunson will be reviewed this coming Friday, and will likely along with many others not advance to a full hearing before the Court.

But ..... the fact that it even made it to conference is a bit of a shocker, especially as it had to be accepted under Rule 11 which is another mountain to climb.

So Brunson has caught the attention of many in the legal, political, world because it is thought to be so radical as to dismiss it outright. But here it’s on the conference list.

Now the above is not intended to create hopium that this case has any chance of a full hearing, let alone a favorable ruling which is considered fantasy. But it’s unsettling to the legal world how it made it this far.

What I drew attention to is the case reflects what a lot of us are concerned about. The Brunson case reflects the angst of the American people.

To me, it’s not plaintiffs or defendants who are on trial here.

The US Supreme Court is on trial.

1,384 posted on 1/2/2023, 5:12:56 PM by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1344 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Thank you, Hostage for commenting and clarifying your perspective here. I am pinging my list for the above commentary.

I recommend the article by Law Prof Tim Canova which Hostage posted recently. If you have not read it, I imho find it fascinating.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4119737/posts


1,394 posted on 01/02/2023 4:02:57 PM PST by TEXOKIE ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1384 | View Replies ]


To: TEXOKIE; All

The Supreme Court itself is on trial in Brunson.

Will the Supreme Court expel Congress? No.

But they can force a settlement by modifying Sovereign Immunity when there is a finding of a Breach of Oath. Thus compelling Congress members to do their duty and INVESTIGATE THE 2020 ELECTION.

Pray they have the courage and wisdom to take up Brunson and rule on Limits of Sovereign Immunity. It will let them off the hook while addressing grievances and granting relief to the People.

With Sovereign Immunity reduced or eliminated by failure of those sworn to fulfill their solemn Oath of Allegiance to the United States and its Constitution, all members and officers of government at every level who are found to be in breach will be subject to the exact same laws and conditions that all Americans must abide by.

Sworn Oaths have meaning and substance, they are not to be ignored for convenience.

What can you do to help? What is a realistic effort for you to engage in and participate?

Two examples:
1. Precinct Strategy (https://precinctstrategy.com)
2. Get to know your Sheriff

The Precinct Strategy requires only a very few hours per week.

As to Sheriffs, witness and follow the example of seriousness and devotion of Constitutional Sheriffs who as elected officeholders take their Oaths seriously unto death if necessary:

https://newtube.app/user/Hostage/e79HaEF
https://newtube.app/user/Hostage/CmqWt0m
https://newtube.app/user/Hostage/I6qLRzO

Understand there are 3,080 elected Sheriffs. Yes, some, a few are dirty. But the vast majority are not.

Your Constitutional Sheriff is the last line of defense between you and tyranny, the closest authority to the preservation of your rights.

Sheriffs in history, in England were and are under the Monarch.

Sheriffs in the United States are bound to the Constitution.

You are a constituent of your elected Sheriff. As a constituent, you have the right to confer with your Sheriff to present your concerns. You may also offer to help, to be of assistance to your Sheriff.

Your Sheriff has the power to deputize you and bind you to responsibilities under the Constitution.

Your Sheriff can present you with a badge in exchange for your solemn sworn Oath to the Constitution.

If your Sheriff chooses for you to act as an agent of enforcement, you will receive a gun and firearms training.

You can have a badge, a gun, and authority under the Constitution.

There is no need to take up arms without authority.

You can call on your Sheriff this week to start the process. You will very very likely be surprised to find how friendly and accommodating your Sheriff will be. Even should you not have the capacity or time to volunteer for your Sheriff, you will still benefit, and your Sheriff will benefit, by coming to know each other, especially in times such as now.


1,543 posted on 01/03/2023 3:21:16 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1394 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson