Posted on 08/26/2022 12:58:27 PM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T Fractal Trader]
An Italian study published two weeks ago in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (“IJVTPR”) revealed almost everyone who had been injected had abnormalities after “Covid vaccination.” In 94% of vaccinees’ blood, there was an aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes.
The study began in March 2021. Using dark-field microscopy, the researchers analysed blood samples from 1,006 referred to the Giovannini Biodiagnostic Centre for various disorders after being injected with Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA “vaccines.”
The study authors noted that the “vaccines” are purported to contain at least the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, but are known also to contain foreign particles that the many promoters of the experimental injections claimed were not in them at all. “Among those foreign components are metallic objects as demonstrated previously in this journal by Lee et al. (2022) which are confirmed in our results.”
Of the 1,006 cases analysed, only 58 – equal to 5.77% of the total – presented a completely normal haematological picture upon microscopic analysis after the last mRNA injection with either the Moderna or Pfizer concoction. The blood of 948 – 94% of the study’s participants – showed aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA injection.
In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal haematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves.
We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47
Below we include some highlights, although the paper contains so many important points it is difficult to select which are the highlights. The paper is written in such a way that those without formal science training can easily understand and it is well worth taking the time to read it in its entirety. For those who wish to delve a little deeper, the reference section at the end of their paper provides further resources.The study authors included photographs of the 4 clinical cases which “reveal strange phenomena in their blood and illustrate the range and types of the anomalies found in the microscopic examination of the blood of 94.23% of the 1,006 cases … [these 4 cases are] representative of all 948 cases with peripheral blood alterations.”
We have included some of these photographs below, the accompanying descriptions are self-explanatory.
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022In their discussion and conclusion section, the authors wrote:
Aggregation of erythrocytes were highlighted and exogenous point-like and self-luminescent particles in the dark-field were detected. The luminescence of those particles was markedly higher than that of oxygenated red blood cell walls.
The 948 cases, showed tubular/fibrous formations and frequently also crystalline and lamellar formations with extremely complex but consistently similar morphologies across all of the patients with abnormal blood samples.
Our results are so similar to those of Lee et al. (2022) that it could be claimed that, except for our innovative application of dark-field microscopy to mark the foreign metal-like objects in the blood of mRNA injections from Pfizer or Moderna, we have replicated the blood work of the Korean doctors with a much larger sample.
What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari (Montanari & Gatti, 2016; Gatti & Montanari, 2012, 2017, 2018), have been included in the cocktail of whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines.”
In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there.
In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying haemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented.
In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow, especially at the level of the capillaries.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47
Further resources:
- Chief Investigator confirms AstraZeneca Vaccine IS to blame for rare blood clots, 21 March 2021
- Scientific Study finds the spike protein used in Covid Vaccines causes Strokes, Heart attacks, and Blood Clots, 19 May 2021
- The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks, 10 July 2021
- The Long-Term Outlook Due to Blood Clotting from Covid Injections is Very Grim Because with Each Successive Shot, it Will Add More Damage to Capillaries, 21 August 2021
- Covid Injection Secret Ingredients | UK Scientists confirm Graphene and New Zealand Scientists confirm Nanotechnology; What’s The Aim? 12 February 2022
- Medicine Regulators knew in October 2020 that the Covid-19 Vaccines would cause blood clots, heart damage, harm to children, and death, 22 August 2021
- German Doctors and Lawyers Assess Blood Smears from People Who Have Had Covid Injections: “For me this is euthanasia. For me this is mass murder, a crime on a grand scale”, 31 August 2021
- Canadian Researchers Find Carbon Nanotech and Thulium in Moderna and Pfizer Covid Injections, 27 May 2022
- German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations Immediately, 13 August 2022
Funny. That’s the second point you have missed today. It must be hard to be you when literally everyone else can see the irony in the statement. Except you. So please, go ahead, give more pointers on how to be humorous. I need a good laugh today as you have provided by being irony impaired.
Oh and think you for your different tone. I like it when you are forced to be a little more deferential. Seems like you have been put in your place. Stay there.
Adorable. You continue to exist in an alternate reality. You see humor where there is none, safe and efficient vaccines while you are in the middle of a medical horror movie. Up isn't down, in your world, it's sideways.
But it's good you have a new sidekick. You and Carrot Top will be very happy together. You can be his Ed McMahon and over laugh uproariously at his penny-ante non-funny 'jokes'.
And as a side gig, you can pimp a failed vax and pretend dead vaxtards are not dropping out of the trees. THEN....you can run down to the law offices of Diddy, Fuqum, and Howe and file lawsuits cause the Qtards were mean to you on the internet.
That's humor, Quackenstein. Where every sentence is chock full of comedy goodness. Overwhelms the mind, right?
But honestly. You ain't built for the dozens. You're a poindexter. You are not a joker. You're the butt of the jokes. You tellin' me you ain't used to that by now?
As your pal Grey Whiskers would say, 'You're too short for this ride'.
Let's travel into the future and get a glimpse of your great, great, great, great grandson as he comes across a lifeless crew member who has just received the covid vax....
Notice who the boss is. Some things never chnge.
#DoctorLeonardMcQuack
First of all. It’s Dewey Screwem and Howe. I am represented by Dewey.
Secondly the tort is libel which is malicious printed word intended to harm.
Thirdly had I not been doxxed which is clearly against forum rules (you know the same rules the oracle posts proudly on the start of Q threads warning afsknst disruption etc. sort of a lesson you seemed to have missed). The asshat who threatened to dox me then bragged about it on a thread that was brought to my attention. He named the people be doxxed me to and they followed up with me. The asshat connected the dots right back to himself.
So I am not exactly running to a lawyer because you think you are big and bad and hurt my feelings. You are actually quite irrelevant to me and if need to believe that somehow I am harmed after reading your nonsense then please keep living in the world of delusion.
Because the tort of libel and then subsequent cyberstalking was committed against me, Howe suggested that there was vicarious liability on behalf of ownership for not enforcing the rules despite repeated warnings to doxx me. I told them unequivocally I do not hold the ownership responsible for the member. I would never overreach to that level although some other less civilized than myself might.
Next I merely pointed out that I have the option after consultation with legal representation. The bitch is that the statute of limitations is two years for this tort. So I can wait until summer if 2024 to decide if I want to proceed. Should I want to proceed it will cost a minimum of $100,000 for someone to defend as I plan to enjoy discovery to the fullest extent of the law. So there is always that.
So please, bagster, go ahead. Continue your commentary that is patently false and libelous. What you don’t know is who did this to me. You may have posted things that called for these activities that are actionable. The beauty is you must question now what you have said and it is just and true. Provided you haven’t put anything in writing that would be actionable I guess you have nothing to worry about. But you are a prolific poster. You have said many things that can be reviewed. And if I recall right you blame Mom MD for you landing with a two week time out. Funny thing. It wasn’t her.
So consider if you have been faithful and honest to the truth. Consider all the things you may have said that could cause damage If linked to the person who doxxed me and then consider just how easy it is to review postings and then subpoena URL locations and where things may have come from.
I assume you if I decided to pursue I don’t play. All my ducks are lined up in a near and tidy little row. The person who exposed me is in a pretty mess. I suppose you might now want to consider what you say in the future. Your past is quite prolific. The last words on a hypothetical complaint are quite simple. Govern yourself accordingly. Perhaps all I have done my choosing to respond to you is set you up and bait you into building a case. Perhaps it never occurred to you despite me point blank telling you that I was toying with you. For the record you took the rope and made is nice and king and hi by yourself with it.
I guess I just have to decide how gracious and kind I am at this point. Good thing I have two years to think about it. Go ahead. Abuse me. Say what you want. But I assure you don’t want to try me. The resources it costs to defend something make it worthwhile to me even if I would not prevail.
Have a lovely evening. Try not to think too hard about if you were played like a fiddle and delivered the exact sound I wanted. It has been a virtuoso performance for one of us. Time will tell just how many movements I want to conduct.
The promise and perils of Unit 731 data to advance COVID-19 research
Okay, got to jump in now.
*************************************
Lets take a little trip down memory lane, Shall we?
“Ok, let me speak infantile to you. Under the EUA it was stated that there were no data to suggest what prevention of transmission was. Most recents studies demonstrate that > 90% of the time there is prevention of disease and transmission. So if you want to use widely isolated incidents, then you are the dumbass.
Currently the breakthrough rate is >> 1% (That is significantly less, as based on your posts it seems you have problems reading scientific symbols) whereas in phased trials (OMG they are actually tested in human subjects contrary to your posts) the vaccine was 95% effective. THEREFORE, the vaccination is performing better than phased trials demonstrated.”
Good night, Dumbass
29 posted on 4/21/2021, 7:15:06 PM by gas_dr
How about this one?
**********************************
Because the most recent data show (Israel / America) that the vaccination prevents transmission and infection. Simple.
2 posted on 4/21/2021, 6:32:40 PM by gas_dr
It is what I say it is.
Secondly the tort is libel which is malicious printed word intended to harm.
Awww, was ito ickems harmed? Maybe we should call a doctor.
...(you know the same rules the oracle posts proudly on the start of Q threads
Tell me, brainiac? Who exactly is The Oracle?
So I am not exactly running to a lawyer because you think you are big and bad and hurt my feelings.
But I am big and bad and your novel length cry-posts testify to that fact. And your feeble attempts to hurt MY feelings. Pro-tip. My feelings cannot be hurt, least of all by some internet nerd.
You are actually quite irrelevant to me and if need to believe that somehow I am harmed after reading your nonsense then please keep living in the world of delusion.
And yet you pen War and Peace length novelettes explaining yourself, denying criticisms, lashing out, and generally throwing a man comical man fit. Yea, I'm irrelevant to you. Righto.
Next I merely pointed out that I have the option after consultation with legal representation.
I would have paid good money to be a fly on the wall while you set there, with your shiny shoes, in front of some lawyers desk laying out your case, the tears welling up in your eye socket, hands shacking, and chins quivering. If you videotaped it, I'll buy if off you. FReepmail me, we can do business. Comedy gold.
Should I want to proceed it will cost a minimum of $100,000 for someone to defend as I plan to enjoy discovery to the fullest extent of the law. So there is always that.
Oh noes. I guess I better start collecting aluminum cans now, right?
So please, bagster, go ahead. Continue your commentary that is patently false and libelous.
That's the second time today you have instructed me to write certain things to you. The last time you wanted me to call you names. I am nothing if not a servant to my fellow man and will always help a brother out. Ya think this will come out in discovery? What should I do next?
The beauty is you must question now what you have said and it is just and true.
Or not.
I suppose you might now want to consider what you say in the future.
Or not.
Perhaps all I have done my choosing to respond to you is set you up and bait you into building a case.
And......there goes his case. Bailiff, clear the courtroom.
Perhaps it never occurred to you despite me point blank telling you that I was toying with you.
Exhibit B.
See, it's your arrogance that compels you to talk too much when you should just act. Now you went and blew up your goofy, paranoid 'case'.
I guess you have nothing to worry about.
How does it feel to be right just one time?
What you don’t know is who did this to me.
How can you know what I don't know? You say bizarre things. That statement will not fly in court, counselor. I most strenuously object.
So consider if you have been faithful and honest to the truth. Consider all the things you may have said that could cause damage If linked to the person who doxxed me and then consider just how easy it is to review postings and then subpoena URL locations and where things may have come from.
I choose not to consider those things, thankQ anyway.
I assume you if I decided to pursue I don’t play. All my ducks are lined up in a near and tidy little row.K/i>
I was wondering what that quacking sound was every time you showed up. I didn't know you travelled with ducks.
Go ahead. Abuse me. Say what you want.
Again with the requests. How can I deny such a kindly old gentleman?
But I assure you don’t want to try me.
How is it that you know so much? Truly amazing.
Try not to think too hard about if you were played like a fiddle and delivered the exact sound I wanted. It has been a virtuoso performance for one of us. Time will tell just how many movements I want to conduct.
Oooops, and again.
I hope you don't mind if I share this with certain members of the so-called (misidentified) 'triumverate'. This comedy masterpiece needs a larger viewing. There may be nothing good on t.v. where they come from. It should perk them right up.
I will say this, you are the world's worst threatener, specially when you got your serious face on. But you are funnier than I had previously thought. You're way funnier than Chase. I can't stop chuckling over here. Thanks for the entertainment, gassie.
p.s. People are dropping dead from the fake poison vax. Get with the program.
Welp... I guess that’s just about the end of YOU right there.
You’re going up the river, up in the County and out to the farm.
You can count on me to toss a few dollars in your commissary
account, you know, for ramen and deodorant and such like.
I hope this lesson is well heeded here on Free Republic.
Sassing people on the internets is serious business and
can land your ass in stir pretty darn quick if you ain’t careful.
That’s why I NEVER do any sassing, no sir, not me.
I’m too pretty for prison.
Somebody sneaked up behind you a yanked your pants down?
Dayum…
They all look familiar.
IMO, it’s really irrelevant whether it’s a few weeks or months, vs. years.
Even within shorter time frames, death or enough damage can be done that warrants that kind of legal action.
And besides, I don’t think that damage actually needs to be done for crimes against humanity to be considered. Simply lying to people and using them as experimental animals under deceit and duress is enough. That in and of itself is bad enough, even without injury or death resulting.
Very well said.
That kind of capitulation to the DS contributes to the destruction of this country as nothing else can do.
It only feeds the blood lust of the left nd their demonically fueled desire for power and control.
When people cave to the DS’s illegal dictates to it to be able to allegedly have the freedoms that are ours by right and the left has no legal right to deny, then it tells the left they are successful and only encourages more of the same, thus ruining it for all the rest of us.
Appeasement NEVER works. It simply results in more bondage and slavery for all. Those who capitulate and encourage the same are actively contributing to the destruction of freedom in this country.
Good night, bagster. You never quite know what you are up against.
Rest well.
If you presume people are gloating over the deaths of the vaxxed, it is merely projection on your part.
It reveals what is in your heart and how you would react.
The bad news is, you and I could be cellies. The good news is, we can start our own prison gang. Start working on some tat designs.
Oh, you'll be making my bunk and folding my socks. Amongst other things.
Just so it ain't them big, giant, hairy spiders. I hate them spiders. Or cottage cheese.
Other than that, I'm good.
More like retread alert.
I never a cult also included someone that implored researchers to do their own, well, research into anything and everything, and to not trust what the magic box tells them. That they’ve been lied to about everything.
Last I remember, cults do everything possible to discourage individual thought. Mormons are ruthless when it comes to those that left their cult, same with Jehovah’s.
What I have always found interesting is how on one hand, we have public figures, real doctors with real medical degrees, real life experience and expertise in their related fields, warning of the dangers of these unproved and virtually untested experimental injections.
OTOH, we have a cadre of mostly anonymous posters on a relatively obscure internet forum not proving that the EUA injections are safe and effective, but rather engaging in slander and character assassination of anyone who does not parrot their agenda regardless of the credentials of those speaking out against it.
And yet they provide NO information in the least as to why they should be believed over those men and women with enough integrity to publicly speak out, knowing full well the risk they are taking countering the DS narrative and yet speaking out anyways.
The anonymous internet posters expect us to take on their word that they are indeed doctors, they have the expertise in immunology and vaccine development, and somehow have knowledge of all the possible short and long term effects these EUA injections could possibly have. And they engage in mockery and derision towards those who are not gullible enough to blindly take them by faith.
And I should believe anonymous internet mockers over credentialed, experienced medical professionals and if I don’t, I’m not following the science????
The depths of delusion and deception in some people expecting us to believe them for no good reason, is truly staggering.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.