Replies

First of all. It’s Dewey Screwem and Howe. I am represented by Dewey.
Secondly the tort is libel which is malicious printed word intended to harm.
Thirdly had I not been doxxed which is clearly against forum rules (you know the same rules the oracle posts proudly on the start of Q threads warning afsknst disruption etc. sort of a lesson you seemed to have missed). The asshat who threatened to dox me then bragged about it on a thread that was brought to my attention. He named the people be doxxed me to and they followed up with me. The asshat connected the dots right back to himself.

So I am not exactly running to a lawyer because you think you are big and bad and hurt my feelings. You are actually quite irrelevant to me and if need to believe that somehow I am harmed after reading your nonsense then please keep living in the world of delusion.

Because the tort of libel and then subsequent cyberstalking was committed against me, Howe suggested that there was vicarious liability on behalf of ownership for not enforcing the rules despite repeated warnings to doxx me. I told them unequivocally I do not hold the ownership responsible for the member. I would never overreach to that level although some other less civilized than myself might.

Next I merely pointed out that I have the option after consultation with legal representation. The bitch is that the statute of limitations is two years for this tort. So I can wait until summer if 2024 to decide if I want to proceed. Should I want to proceed it will cost a minimum of $100,000 for someone to defend as I plan to enjoy discovery to the fullest extent of the law. So there is always that.

So please, bagster, go ahead. Continue your commentary that is patently false and libelous. What you don’t know is who did this to me. You may have posted things that called for these activities that are actionable. The beauty is you must question now what you have said and it is just and true. Provided you haven’t put anything in writing that would be actionable I guess you have nothing to worry about. But you are a prolific poster. You have said many things that can be reviewed. And if I recall right you blame Mom MD for you landing with a two week time out. Funny thing. It wasn’t her.

So consider if you have been faithful and honest to the truth. Consider all the things you may have said that could cause damage If linked to the person who doxxed me and then consider just how easy it is to review postings and then subpoena URL locations and where things may have come from.

I assume you if I decided to pursue I don’t play. All my ducks are lined up in a near and tidy little row. The person who exposed me is in a pretty mess. I suppose you might now want to consider what you say in the future. Your past is quite prolific. The last words on a hypothetical complaint are quite simple. Govern yourself accordingly. Perhaps all I have done my choosing to respond to you is set you up and bait you into building a case. Perhaps it never occurred to you despite me point blank telling you that I was toying with you. For the record you took the rope and made is nice and king and hi by yourself with it.

I guess I just have to decide how gracious and kind I am at this point. Good thing I have two years to think about it. Go ahead. Abuse me. Say what you want. But I assure you don’t want to try me. The resources it costs to defend something make it worthwhile to me even if I would not prevail.

Have a lovely evening. Try not to think too hard about if you were played like a fiddle and delivered the exact sound I wanted. It has been a virtuoso performance for one of us. Time will tell just how many movements I want to conduct.

Get a load of this...

The promise and perils of Unit 731 data to advance COVID-19 research

Okay, got to jump in now.
*************************************

Lets take a little trip down memory lane, Shall we?

“Ok, let me speak infantile to you. Under the EUA it was stated that there were no data to suggest what prevention of transmission was. Most recents studies demonstrate that > 90% of the time there is prevention of disease and transmission. So if you want to use widely isolated incidents, then you are the dumbass.

Currently the breakthrough rate is >> 1% (That is significantly less, as based on your posts it seems you have problems reading scientific symbols) whereas in phased trials (OMG they are actually tested in human subjects contrary to your posts) the vaccine was 95% effective. THEREFORE, the vaccination is performing better than phased trials demonstrated.”

Good night, Dumbass

29 posted on 4/21/2021, 7:15:06 PM by gas_dr

How about this one?

**********************************
Because the most recent data show (Israel / America) that the vaccination prevents transmission and infection. Simple.

2 posted on 4/21/2021, 6:32:40 PM by gas_dr

First of all. It’s Dewey Screwem and Howe. I am represented by Dewey.

It is what I say it is.

Secondly the tort is libel which is malicious printed word intended to harm.

Awww, was ito ickems harmed? Maybe we should call a doctor.

...(you know the same rules the oracle posts proudly on the start of Q threads

Tell me, brainiac? Who exactly is The Oracle?

So I am not exactly running to a lawyer because you think you are big and bad and hurt my feelings.

But I am big and bad and your novel length cry-posts testify to that fact. And your feeble attempts to hurt MY feelings. Pro-tip. My feelings cannot be hurt, least of all by some internet nerd.

You are actually quite irrelevant to me and if need to believe that somehow I am harmed after reading your nonsense then please keep living in the world of delusion.

And yet you pen War and Peace length novelettes explaining yourself, denying criticisms, lashing out, and generally throwing a man comical man fit. Yea, I'm irrelevant to you. Righto.

Next I merely pointed out that I have the option after consultation with legal representation.

I would have paid good money to be a fly on the wall while you set there, with your shiny shoes, in front of some lawyers desk laying out your case, the tears welling up in your eye socket, hands shacking, and chins quivering. If you videotaped it, I'll buy if off you. FReepmail me, we can do business. Comedy gold.

Should I want to proceed it will cost a minimum of $100,000 for someone to defend as I plan to enjoy discovery to the fullest extent of the law. So there is always that.

Oh noes. I guess I better start collecting aluminum cans now, right?

So please, bagster, go ahead. Continue your commentary that is patently false and libelous.

That's the second time today you have instructed me to write certain things to you. The last time you wanted me to call you names. I am nothing if not a servant to my fellow man and will always help a brother out. Ya think this will come out in discovery? What should I do next?

The beauty is you must question now what you have said and it is just and true.

Or not.

I suppose you might now want to consider what you say in the future.

Or not.

Perhaps all I have done my choosing to respond to you is set you up and bait you into building a case.

And......there goes his case. Bailiff, clear the courtroom.

Perhaps it never occurred to you despite me point blank telling you that I was toying with you.

Exhibit B.

See, it's your arrogance that compels you to talk too much when you should just act. Now you went and blew up your goofy, paranoid 'case'.

I guess you have nothing to worry about.

How does it feel to be right just one time?

What you don’t know is who did this to me.

How can you know what I don't know? You say bizarre things. That statement will not fly in court, counselor. I most strenuously object.

So consider if you have been faithful and honest to the truth. Consider all the things you may have said that could cause damage If linked to the person who doxxed me and then consider just how easy it is to review postings and then subpoena URL locations and where things may have come from.

I choose not to consider those things, thankQ anyway.

I assume you if I decided to pursue I don’t play. All my ducks are lined up in a near and tidy little row.K/i>

I was wondering what that quacking sound was every time you showed up. I didn't know you travelled with ducks.

Go ahead. Abuse me. Say what you want.

Again with the requests. How can I deny such a kindly old gentleman?

But I assure you don’t want to try me.

How is it that you know so much? Truly amazing.

Try not to think too hard about if you were played like a fiddle and delivered the exact sound I wanted. It has been a virtuoso performance for one of us. Time will tell just how many movements I want to conduct.

Oooops, and again.

I hope you don't mind if I share this with certain members of the so-called (misidentified) 'triumverate'. This comedy masterpiece needs a larger viewing. There may be nothing good on t.v. where they come from. It should perk them right up.

I will say this, you are the world's worst threatener, specially when you got your serious face on. But you are funnier than I had previously thought. You're way funnier than Chase. I can't stop chuckling over here. Thanks for the entertainment, gassie.

p.s. People are dropping dead from the fake poison vax. Get with the program.

The person who exposed me is in a pretty mess.

Somebody sneaked up behind you a yanked your pants down?

Here’s how it was explained to me a few years ago by my brother.
I don’t think anything has changed.

On many internet sites people use pseudo type names. Like here, and yahoo message boards, etc.

On THOSE sites if you say something that defames a person under a fake name, it’s not as powerful of libel because they’re not using their real name, but it’s still a possible cause of action.

For example; “Echo29 sells drugs and has sold drugs that killed people.”

Now, if someone were to be Doxxed and their real Identity exposed, it changes everything.

For example; “Echo29 is John Dough he lives at 12345 Main Street, Reno, Nevada.”

That means now the statement of “Echo29 sells drugs….” is attached to John Dough.

John Dough has a strong cause for action because of Libel. Depending on the State in which John Dough resides, different infractions may apply.

Which brings up Facebook……..where most people use their real names so they can be found by friends and family and be identified with their personal “page”.

It’s different when the person is using their real name. Because if they have Cause they can take action quickly and easier if someone makes libelist statements about them. On Facebook it’s often Broadcasted to a list of Friends or Professionals the Plaintiff knows and people that know them.

The clincher is the person libeled needs to show damages……OR show that the statements made about them are so egregious that any reasonable person can assume it would and/or did harm them.

I can say to John Dough, “Why are you so lazy? Mow your lawn!”.
Well, how does that damage John Dough? It really doesn’t.

But if I say to John Dough, “You are a murderer and incompetent and deserve bad things to happen to you.”

Well, John Dough can show damages even if it’s unknown if John’s Ice Cream business was hurt because of that statement.

It’s also based on what any reasonable person would say, think or do.

A Jury (or Judge in a bench trial) would have to think if they heard that about John Dough, would they avoid his Ice Cream shop?
If so, there are damages.

So direct damages doesn’t need to be proven (although it helps), a fault in libel can be found if it’s presumed a reasonable person would be influenced by a libelist statement.

This convo came up between my brother and I when I was on Facebook (before I left).
My Congressman’s Web-Site was flooded with Leftist acting like Leftist.
So I would Dox them, go to Google Street view find their home and post their address and a pic of their house.

I got their address from the voter rolls.
I didn’t defame them. I didn’t Libel them as they use their real name and voter information is public domain. I merely shook them up. Some were very upset. 😆🤣😂

By the way…….David Chase is indeed my real name as I have stated many times before.
Now ya know why. 😉

Please do not talk about your movements.