|
Posted on 06/27/2022 4:28:22 AM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Thanks for the ping.
Wow!
5-4 decision ruling on remain in Mexico
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-hands-biden-victory-allows-end-remain-mexico-policy
‘a biden victory’
the border decision might dull that smile, ...sigh
I’ve been skipping the halls here at work!
I’ve got a sh!t eating grin on here.
Most of my co-workers are working up their sadz.
The Stay in Mexico decision is not a “Y’all come on in!” opinion.
*
A couple paragraphs from the EPA dcecision today (added breaks for easier reading):
...
The dissent contends that there is nothing surprising about EPA dictating the optimal mix of energy sources nationwide, since that sort of mandate will reduce air pollution from power plants, which is EPA’s bread and butter. Post, at 20–22. But that does not follow.
Forbidding evictions may slow the spread of disease, but the CDC’s ordering such a measure certainly “raise[s] an eyebrow.” Post, at 18.
We would not expect the Department of Homeland Security to make trade or foreign policy even though doing so could decrease illegal immigration.
And no one would consider generation shifting a “tool” in OSHA’s “toolbox,” post, at 21, even though reducing generation at coal plants would reduce workplace illness and injury from coal dust.
...
It is one thing for Congress to authorize regulated sources to use trading to comply with a preset cap, or a cap that must be based on some scientific, objective criterion, such as the 30 WEST VIRGINIA v. EPA Opinion of the Court NAAQS. It is quite another to simply authorize EPA to set the cap itself wherever the Agency sees fit.
...
“Capping carbon dioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible “solution to the crisis of the day.” New York v. United States, 505 U. S. 144, 187 (1992).
But it is not plausible that Congress gave EPA the authority to adopt on its own such a regulatory scheme in Section 111(d). A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself, or an agency acting pursuant to a clear delegation from that representative body.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is reversed, and the cases are remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered”
just a thought: Maybe President Trump has no intention of running again. Why should he. He is pretty much in control of many things and doing a fine job of cleaning of the mess out of the WH. DeSantis would be a great President...probably... President Trump would be a great help out of the WH. If they put together the right team, it could be a dynamite combination.
The foundation of the building, you might say.
Still need the walls etc but without foundation, nothing.
THis movie is too exciting for me at times...
dan patrick - “devastating decision”.
in Biden’s possible 4 years,more people will be allowed into this country illegally than live in LA and NYC combined - 40 to 50 Million people
$4Billion spending this year in Texas on border (usually 400M)
(fun fact - border is longer than mileage from Florida to Maine)
any legal recourse? back into session in January, pass leg to get back to the SC, we need control of our border. Impacts 29 M texans.
“This presidency is a culture of death”
Cap and Trade for Carbon reduction is a “government taking”.
Congress must decide on the proper valuation.
This has been the Oil&Gas industry position for decades.
Thanks, but all that I did was post them to share the info.
Me thinks the SCOTUS gave us a glimpse as to which Bureaus/Agencies could be next?
“The dissent contends that there is nothing surprising about EPA dictating the optimal mix of energy sources nationwide, since that sort of mandate will reduce air pollution from power plants, which is EPA’s bread and butter. Post, at 20–22. But that does not follow.
Forbidding evictions may slow the spread of disease, but the >>CDC<<’s ordering such a measure certainly “raise[s] an eyebrow.” Post, at 18.
We would not expect the >>Department of Homeland Security<< to make trade or foreign policy even though doing so could decrease illegal immigration.
And no one would consider generation shifting a “tool” in >>OSHA’s<< “toolbox,” post, at 21, even though reducing generation at coal plants would reduce workplace illness and injury from coal dust.
And in Europe they are ruining farmers' livelihoods saying they need to reduce NITROGEN.
True that!
Can you imagine the amount of UREA cattle are putting into the soil every day!
In the end, the real pollutant is the democRAT party, and the RINOs that travel with it. Everything they do is to worsen life for others.
***As said before, the diversity found in our language, due to local colloquialisms and carried into the great expanse of this country, only enrich the American Experience.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Howzit bruddah!
You stay right in what you say. Da kine variety in language lidat makes us all bettah!
Aloha!
🐷
smileyface wrote:
“
My guess is adrenochrome can be readily extracted from plasma on an industrial level. The Red Cross was/is prolly involved. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%22Adrenochrome%22%5BMAJR%5D&page=3
“
If adrenochrome can be made from plasma, then why scare someone to death in order to extract it?
in Biden’s possible 4 years,more people will be allowed into this country illegally than live in LA and NYC combined - 40 to 50 Million people"
The Biden v. Texasdecision seems to hinge on the use of the word "may" as in the following (emphasis added):
III
We now turn to the merits. Section 1225(b)(2)(C) provides: “In the case of an alien . . . who is arriving on land . . . from a foreign territory contiguous to the United States, the [Secretary] may return the alien to that territory pending a proceeding under section 1229a.” Section 1225(b)(2)(C) plainly confers a discretionary authority to return aliens to Mexico during the pendency of their immigration proceedings. This Court has “repeatedly observed” that “the word ‘may’ clearly connotes discretion.” Opati v. Republic of Sudan, 590 U. S. ___, ___ (2020) (slip op., at 10) (emphasis in original); see also, e.g., Weyerhaeuser Co. v. United States Fish and Wildlife Serv., 586 U. S. ___, ___ (2018) (slip op., at 14); Jama v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 543 U. S. 335, 346 (2005)."
IMHO, any administration that does not return them across the border is working against the best interests of America and has ulterior motives that are, shall we say, nefarious?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
