dan patrick - “devastating decision”.
in Biden’s possible 4 years,more people will be allowed into this country illegally than live in LA and NYC combined - 40 to 50 Million people
$4Billion spending this year in Texas on border (usually 400M)
(fun fact - border is longer than mileage from Florida to Maine)
any legal recourse? back into session in January, pass leg to get back to the SC, we need control of our border. Impacts 29 M texans.
“This presidency is a culture of death”
in Biden’s possible 4 years,more people will be allowed into this country illegally than live in LA and NYC combined - 40 to 50 Million people"
The Biden v. Texasdecision seems to hinge on the use of the word "may" as in the following (emphasis added):
III
We now turn to the merits. Section 1225(b)(2)(C) provides: “In the case of an alien . . . who is arriving on land . . . from a foreign territory contiguous to the United States, the [Secretary] may return the alien to that territory pending a proceeding under section 1229a.” Section 1225(b)(2)(C) plainly confers a discretionary authority to return aliens to Mexico during the pendency of their immigration proceedings. This Court has “repeatedly observed” that “the word ‘may’ clearly connotes discretion.” Opati v. Republic of Sudan, 590 U. S. ___, ___ (2020) (slip op., at 10) (emphasis in original); see also, e.g., Weyerhaeuser Co. v. United States Fish and Wildlife Serv., 586 U. S. ___, ___ (2018) (slip op., at 14); Jama v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 543 U. S. 335, 346 (2005)."
IMHO, any administration that does not return them across the border is working against the best interests of America and has ulterior motives that are, shall we say, nefarious?