Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Democrats Want to Get Rid of the Suburbs
American Thinker ^ | 20 Jun, 2022 | Linda R. Killian

Posted on 06/20/2022 4:30:03 AM PDT by MtnClimber

The war on America's suburbs has opened a new front. Buried in President Biden's proposed budget for 2023 is a $10-billion bribe for suburban communities to remove zoning barriers to high-density housing. The federal government promises the suburbs funding for street improvements, traffic control, and water and sewer lines if they adopt "housing-forward policies" that eliminate single-family zoning and open their communities to "affordable housing."

This is no benign endeavor to provide more housing. It is a strong signal to Democrat-controlled states to gear up the decades-long efforts to bludgeon affluent communities into submitting to "housing justice" and providing their "fair share."

The New York metro area has been ground zero for efforts to erode local zoning, and if Democrats retain the governorship and supermajorities in both houses of the Legislature, the pressure will be on New York's officials to enact legislation — first to weaken local zoning and then to destroy it. Their new tools are accessory dwelling units (ADUs), which can be apartments over garages and standalone dwellings, and large multi-family transit-oriented developments (TODs), surrounding train stations and bus depots.

These efforts are being fueled by housing activists and progressive think-tanks like the Brookings Institution, which declared in a January 2022 article: "By some measures, the suburban counties around New York City have some of the worst exclusionary zoning in the nation."

To understand the hostility to the suburbs, some background is useful. The initial strategy was to usurp local control through litigation brought by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). It had limited success because to eviscerate local control, HUD had to prove racial discrimination, which by the 1980s and 1990s had largely been eradicated. So HUD tried other tactics.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Society
KEYWORDS: bidenvoters; communism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: EEGator

It was sort of like visiting another country without flying or a passport.


21 posted on 06/20/2022 5:07:36 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Where is Biden leading us and what's with the hand basket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

But with the same shitty weather…


22 posted on 06/20/2022 5:08:29 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
"Why Democrats Want to Get Rid of the Suburbs"

The destruction of the middle class--the bourgeoisie--one of their top priorities. That's communism101.

Karl Marx said that the bourgeoisie is the greatest impediment to the establishment of the worldwide communist "utopia."

Millions of people have fallen for his fundamentally evil designs.

Marx acknowledged that horrible, violent class warfare and the establishment of a police state would be necessary--even desirable, which speaks volumes about Marx the man!

And one of the glaring fallacies of his absurd design is that once this global police state had established worldwide communism, the need for government would MIRACULOUSLY vanish and everyone would live in harmony without government and without any need for government. In other words: "A miracle will take place."

Anybody who falls for that kind of snake oil is a fool, but there are obviously millions of fools in the world--and that's not the only flaw in his load of hogwash.

23 posted on 06/20/2022 5:10:33 AM PDT by Savage Beast ("Saints are sinners who never gave up." St. Theresa of Avila)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The part they can’t say out loud: all high density apartment buildings vote majority Democrat. Suburbs have swing voters. Planting one high density apartment building is an easy way to throw an area to a Democrat majority, 100% of the time. It’s low-hanging fruit for establishing permanent one-party rule.


24 posted on 06/20/2022 5:12:11 AM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

They want to GHETTOIZE all of us!!


25 posted on 06/20/2022 5:12:43 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.h)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
When food prices double and gas goes to $10/gal, rural people who commute 60-80 miles a day round trip won't be able to afford to live rural and will have to move towards the cities. Multi-family dwellings will be needed. The extra money in those areas' economies will allow them to be like the cities with a camera on every corner, gunshot sound detectors. By that time we'll also have our digital IDs to spend our digital money.

Agenda 2030 is right around the corner. Rural land will go back to wild like they want it to.

If the globalists get their way.

26 posted on 06/20/2022 5:12:43 AM PDT by Pollard (If there's a question mark in the headline, the answer should always be No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Anything to do with freedom, opportunity and peace of mind is evil to democrats.


27 posted on 06/20/2022 5:16:00 AM PDT by Track9 (You are far too inquisitive not to be seduced…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: euram

“They want to flood the suburbs with criminals, gangs, rapists, and murderers.”

While simultaneously disarming us. The resulting crime and victimization will enable them to establish martial law and complete social control.

“Sensible gun safety” is their means of achieving despotism.


28 posted on 06/20/2022 5:21:05 AM PDT by SharpenedEdge (Stockpile. Prepare. Arm. Train. A Storm is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: stinkerpot65
Property freedom, travel freedom, education freedom, crime freedom.

I've always thought of zoning as unconstitutional under the "takings clause".

In a free country you should be able to do whatever you want with your property.

I thought it was the meddling big government leftists that got zoning started.

29 posted on 06/20/2022 5:24:00 AM PDT by Mogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“housing justice”

Another commie utopian tactic in their never ending race-to-the-bottom quest to turn us into a third world hellhole.


30 posted on 06/20/2022 5:25:53 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (“Giving money & power to government is like giving whiskey & car keys to teenage boys” P.J. O’Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
And prices will go up by the same order of magnitude.

BS. So if we went back to slavery ( free labor) then everything we use/need will be free? The cost of labor is about 5% of the cost of a durable goods we buy, if that.

31 posted on 06/20/2022 5:30:14 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
The inner city hellholes vote overwhelmingly Democratic and are bastions of high crime, welfare and misery. So it stands to reason the Democrats want to replicate that out in the suburbs.

There are no "blue" states. There are only blue cities. Remove the blue cities and we have 50 red states.

32 posted on 06/20/2022 5:34:12 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (3,325,642 active users on Truth Social)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProudDeplorable

Here in FL, I would say the strongest contrast will be between Broward and Palm Beach counties. Broward is perhaps 80% Democratic voters and was “built out” a couple of decades ago. Palm Beach is closer to 50/50 in voter registration and a bit more conservative in local governance than in the representatives sent to DC. West Palm Beach is enormous, and will have decades of new residential development ahead. Nearly everything being built is a gated community.

Broward will fall for the federal funds, Palm Beach County, I don’t think so. So, you will have contiguous counties to compare and contrast in a few decades, and I don’t think it will look so good for Broward.


33 posted on 06/20/2022 5:34:23 AM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I see you went to the AOC school of economics. You’re clueless about what causes inflation, but I’ll give you a hint. A definition of inflation is too much money chasing too few goods.


34 posted on 06/20/2022 5:37:12 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy - EVs a solution for which there is no problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

That’s okay with me...for the close in democrat ones around Chicago like Evanston, Oak Park etc.


35 posted on 06/20/2022 5:37:34 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Trump was right!


36 posted on 06/20/2022 5:37:35 AM PDT by Rusty0604 (" When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat." -Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

CT has already done this with a state law that says any developer including a few deeded, and so long-term, “affordable” units can build without the local town being able to impose any of its zoning limits.

They are essentially forcing the towns on the ocean to become mini-NYCs. Truly horrific and un-American.


37 posted on 06/20/2022 5:39:32 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

“Housing justice” lends new meaning to the phrase “If you build it, they will come”. They WILL come.....and they will TAKE it.


38 posted on 06/20/2022 5:40:23 AM PDT by Qwapisking ("IF the Second goes first the First goes second" LStar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mogger
I've always thought of zoning as unconstitutional under the "takings clause."

If you own land and local zoning isn't to your liking, it's annoying. But it's local, so it's not unconstitutional--USC is silent on the subject. And that makes sense, since, if you don't like the zoning in one place, you can sell and move to somewhere it's different.

Where I grew up, it was the developers bribing town officials to down-zone to quarter-acre lots so they could bring in the urban people that drove us crazy, and eventually drove us elsewhere.

39 posted on 06/20/2022 5:41:01 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Let the Demented One lead the way by opening up his own neighborhood in Delaware. Tear down your privacy fence, Joe!


40 posted on 06/20/2022 5:43:26 AM PDT by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson