|
Posted on 11/11/2021 8:30:08 AM PST by ransomnote
il Donaldo Trumpo (@PapiTrumpo) November 11, 2021
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
I am not surprised.
#647 or they are getting rid of them before Rittenhouse goes full Covington kids on them. :) I smell another megamillions winner
***********************************************************************************
I agree with you. More than one way of destroying a network. And compensatory damages could help bankrupt/destroy these SOBs.
L.L. hated being the downer and sorry this wasn’t true! Oh well.
nite
Jordan Peterson has vax ragerts. He figures out he was fooled into getting the jab. Bezemov tells him why.
"When the military boot crashes his balls, THEN he will understand. But not before that. That's the tragic of this situation of DEMORALIZATION."#NoVaccine pic.twitter.com/XZubPZjo6T— WeThePeeple (@WeThePeeple9) November 13, 2021
Good night ladies!
Good night Smileyface!
They sound like good neighbors.
L.L. hated being the downer and sorry this wasn’t true! Oh well.
______________________________________________________
No apologies necessary. It’s important to bring hope here, especially for those who don’t feel it naturally, but it’s most important to bring truth, no matter how hard that truth might be to hear. You did that for us before we had a chance to spread misinformation far and wide. I know I’m grateful.
Australian Gov’t Vows To Make Sure Unvaccinated Are ‘Miserable’ And ‘Lonely’ For Life
En Volve ^ | 11/12/2021
Posted on 11/12/2021, 6:52:46 PM by Mount Athos
ransomnote: Here's an excerpt
“Oh, they’re crazy not to get vaccinated, life will be miserable without getting vaccinated,” said Dr. Chris Perry, the Queensland president of the Australian Medical Association, during a television appearance.
“You won’t be able to hide, you won’t be able to get a doctor to sign off that you got an exclusion because there’s quite set rules on that and doctors will be audited, every one of their exclusions will be looked at very carefully,” he added, before threatening doctors with crippling fines and termination."
The Gold mine and gamma variant:
A Vaxed Gold Miner attended an event and got the virus. He didn't have symptoms, and so brought the disease to all the workers there -- miners were sort of isolated there. Can you say super spreader? The vax didn't stop the spread...
Here's a table - notice who did or did not get an acute infection (hint check out the prior history of covid-ie natural immunity):
Sounds like a recipe for disaster.
That, or an invitation to keep all those ships in Shanghai until there's someplace for 'em to unload. (I certainly wouldn't want to pay the fuel bill for all of that milling around trying to hold station.)
Maybe OT, but do I recall correctly that those goods sitting out there in the Pacific don't generate any payments until they're actually received (Or at least unloaded) in the US? If so, that can't be making Comrade Xi very full of joy and sunshine.
Rittenhouse Trial Day 9: Prosecution Big Win On “Provocation” Jury Instruction Saves Chance At Conviction
Excerpt:
...Much of the day’s argument over jury instructions centered on the instructions dealing with the legal doctrine of provocation—and that’s because an attack through the doctrine of provocation is the only desperate hope the State has for overcoming Kyle’s powerful claim of self-defense and obtaining convictions on the use-of-force charges against him.
Of the six counts brought against Kyle Rittenhouse in this trial, five are use-of-force felonies (the other is the misdemeanor gun possession charge already discussed). To each of those felony charges, Kyle has raised the legal defense of self-defense. To convict on any of those, then, the State must disprove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt. How might the State do this, given that it has introduced little if any evidence attacking the core elements of Kyle’s self-defense?
By attacking Kyle’s claim of self-defense through the doctrine of provocation.
I expect the State’s central attack on Kyle’s core legal defense of self-defense to come in the form of a narrative of either simple provocation or provocation with intent.
Simple provocation occurs when the defendant engages in unlawful conduct likely to provoke a violent response. When that violent response occurs, the simple provoker cannot claim self-defense for resistance until they exhaust every possibility of avoiding the need to use force, including retreat–where a duty to retreat would not exist in an otherwise lawful act of self-defense.
Provocation with intent occurs when the defendant deliberately provokes a violent response, with the intent of then having an excuse to use deadly force against the person provoked. Importantly, the provoker with intent cannot regain self-defense by withdrawal and communication—on the other hand, the State must prove that malicious intent beyond a reasonable doubt.
I expect that the State’s argument to the jury during closing arguments on Monday will be structured around this legal doctrine provocation in one of those two forms.
This is why the “unicorn” evidence of the drone video and the “enhanced” images from that video have been so important to the State, and why they fought so hard to get them admitted into evidence. With that material in evidence, the State can at least argue provocation. Without that material in evidence, the State would have no substantive attack on self-defense at all.
For example, the State may argue that Kyle was a simple provoker who committed an unlawful act by pointing his rifle at Joshua Ziminski, thus provoking a reasonably foreseeable violent response from Rosenbaum. Although Kyle then fled, the prosecution would argue that he could have fled further than he did, and thus failed to exhaust every possible means of avoiding having to use defensive force. This would mean he had not regained the privilege of self-defense that he lost by his simple provocation.
Alternatively, the prosecution may argue that Kyle was a provoker with intent when he purportedly pointed his rifle at Joshua Ziminski, seeking to provoke a violent response against which he would then have an excuse to use deadly force. Again, this pointing of the rifle did trigger a violent response from Rosenbaum. Rittenhouse then led the provoked Rosenbaum across the parking lot, where Kyle ultimately acted on his intent to use Rosenbaum’s provoked attack as an excuse to use deadly force on Rosenbaum.
As a provoker with intent, the State will conclude, the defendant is not privileged to justify his use of deadly force on Rosenbaum as justified self-defense, and no withdrawal argument can salvage self-defense for a provoker with intent. (One difficulty for the State arguing provocation with intent is that they have not charged Kyle with intentionally killing Rosenbaum, but only with recklessly killing him. Rationally, an argument of provocation with intent only makes sense if the subsequent killing was intentional–but this is not an especially rational prosecution.)
Then the State will use the killing of Rosenbaum as a purported act of provocation with respect to the attacks upon Kyle by “jump kick man,” Huber, and Grosskreutz, attempting to strip him of the legal defense of self-defense for those uses of force, as well.
The defense argued sensibly that the evidence in support of the State’s narrative of provocation—the “unicorn” drone video left by the evidence fairy on the State’s doorstep last Friday, and the “enhanced” photos produced for the first time yesterday—were too flimsy a basis to support an argument of provocation. They pointed out the poor quality of the video and images and noted that for Kyle to be raising his rifle as the State claimed he would have had to suddenly decide, for the first time that night, to handle the rifle as if he were left-handed.
Judge Schroeder essentially informed the State that he didn’t think very much of their provocation evidence, noting how blurry and indecipherable the video and photos were for purposes of determining whether Kyle had pointed his rifle at Ziminski as the State claimed.
He even took the opportunity to review the State’s video on a giant 4k television screen in the courtroom today and walked away without appearing to have seen much of what the State claimed.
Again, however, this is a judge who values the role of the jury, and who is predisposed to give more instructions rather than fewer, and ultimately he decided he would instruct the jury in the provocation doctrine, and thus saving the State from complete argumentative stasis.
It will be the job of the defense, now, to argue against the State’s expected narrative of provocation to the jury during their own closing argument Monday morning.
Monday is going to be a high-stakes day, for certain, as closing arguments always are. This is where the win or loss will ultimately be realized.
... do I recall correctly that those goods sitting out there in the Pacific don’t generate any payments until they’re actually received (Or at least unloaded) in the US? If so, that can’t be making Comrade Xi very full of joy and sunshine.
______________________________________________________
I hadn’t considered the payment trigger before. You make a great point.
CA School District Votes Unanimously to Defy State’s Vaccine Mandate
https://thenewamerican.com/ca-school-district-votes-unanimously-to-defy-states-vaccine-mandate/
I didn't know that either.
Excerpt from link below:
DOE intends to draw down and sell 10.1 million barrels of crude oil from the SPR. This notice of sale is to fulfill the requirements of Section 403(a)(4) of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (5 million barrels) and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018 (5.1 million barrels), which combined require a mandatory sale of 10.1 million barrels during FY 2021. The proceeds of the sale will be deposited in the U.S. Treasury by the end of the Fiscal Year.
https://www.energy.gov/articles/doe-announces-notice-sale-crude-oil-strategic-petroleum-reserve-1
My understanding is that they’re taking all the cases in their jurisdiction and addressing all of them under the cover of the Texas petition so they don’t have to issue for a bunch of individual cases. Bottom line: The “mandate” is TOAST at least before SCOTUS could affirm or deny. The concurring opinion came from a liberal justice, I believe, who said that if the question was before involved an act by Congress overriding the commerce clause or something, a bill or amendment, that would be a debate ... but that the “mandate” as implemented through OSHA didn’t pass the laugh test for anybody. Tell Everyone! THE MANDATE IS TOAST! TBD + WWG1WGA :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
