[stylin19a]

thanks for all that.

am i reading this right ?
looks like this stay is only for the petitioners of the 11/06 stay ?

from this order

"The Clerk of Court shall ensure that this order applies with equal force to all related motions consolidated into this case in accordance with the court’s November 6, 2021 order."

The Nov 6 stay was only for those on the petition

1 This order addresses only the emergency motion filed by the above-captioned petitioners. Going forward, the Clerk of Court shall ensure that all related motions and petitions in this court be consolidated under this case number, and that all parties— including the Government—make all related filings in this case.

[Steven W.]

My understanding is that they’re taking all the cases in their jurisdiction and addressing all of them under the cover of the Texas petition so they don’t have to issue for a bunch of individual cases. Bottom line: The “mandate” is TOAST at least before SCOTUS could affirm or deny. The concurring opinion came from a liberal justice, I believe, who said that if the question was before involved an act by Congress overriding the commerce clause or something, a bill or amendment, that would be a debate ... but that the “mandate” as implemented through OSHA didn’t pass the laugh test for anybody. Tell Everyone! THE MANDATE IS TOAST! TBD + WWG1WGA :)