[Steven W.]

My understanding is that they’re taking all the cases in their jurisdiction and addressing all of them under the cover of the Texas petition so they don’t have to issue for a bunch of individual cases. Bottom line: The “mandate” is TOAST at least before SCOTUS could affirm or deny. The concurring opinion came from a liberal justice, I believe, who said that if the question was before involved an act by Congress overriding the commerce clause or something, a bill or amendment, that would be a debate ... but that the “mandate” as implemented through OSHA didn’t pass the laugh test for anybody. Tell Everyone! THE MANDATE IS TOAST! TBD + WWG1WGA :)

[bitt]

https://gab.com/paulserran/posts/107265290416030310

@paulserran
12h
·
In the link below you can read all 19 Q mentions of Snow White |
https://qanon.pub/?q=Snow%20White

[bitt]

https://gab.com/PepeLivesMatter17/posts/107265371819258705

@PepeLivesMatter17 11h ·

Preach

[bitt]

https://nypost.com/2021/11/12/ex-gov-cuomo-married-aide-derosa-allegedly-caught-making-out-trooper/

[stylin19a]

Thanks...so it’s only for their jurisdiction? ... Can another court ignore a stay, not in their jurisdiction ?
what if anyone, let’s say from the 9th files, and the 9th rules for the mandate? (If I’m a RAT, that’s what I would do. I would file for or against just to get another ruling)