Posted on 09/13/2021 8:08:52 PM PDT by ransomnote
Click to read the post which motivated me to create the image below.. Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Looks like zombie blood.
What is it with democRATS and slaves? If they’re not enslaving people based on color, then they’re doing it based on work ethic through taxes. Always forcing someone else to do the actual work while they enrich themselves. Always.
Congress needs to weigh in on the issue.
Otherwise we are no longer a constitutional republic with separation of powers.
Link to that thread
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3995333/posts
Link in comment #1 of the above thread:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3995009/posts
Comment #1 in this thread
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3995333/posts
:
I agree, that if Bidet uses OSHA and not the legislative process to implement forced shots, the legal case will turn on whether or not such a sweeping “emergency” mandate, that is not limited in time, (can) be authorized by the president without explicit legislation by Congress.
But let’s at least state for the record, that OSHA shouldn’t even exist...thanks Nixon.
1 posted on 9/15/2021, 10:44:36 PM by DoodleBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies | Report Abuse]
And the first few comments:
To: DoodleBob
“Article I
Section 8
The Congress shall have the power to...regulate commerce with foreign nation, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes....
Section 9
The migration or importation of such persons as any of of the states now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the year 1808.”
Section 9 is an undisputable indication of the intended scope of the commerce clause. Congress was not intended to have the power to set the labor conditions on a tobacco plantation or any other workplace. Congress never had the power to require slaves to have a 40-hour work week or $15/hour pay at a minimum.
2 posted on 9/15/2021, 11:07:24 PM by Brian Griffin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
To: DoodleBob
IMO Congress can not delegate its Article 8 powers to the executive branch.
The role of the executive branch should at most be to clarify the law set by Congress.
3 posted on 9/15/2021, 11:12:39 PM by Brian Griffin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
To: Brian Griffin
I agree. You’d need an Amendment.
4 posted on 9/15/2021, 11:19:51 PM by DoodleBob (Gravity’s waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
To: DoodleBob
Does Congress have the power to require women and men to work in different but equally spacious and equipped offices?
No!
5 posted on 9/15/2021, 11:22:24 PM by Brian Griffin ( )
To: DoodleBob
“The Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1590 et seq., 29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) requires, in part, that every employer covered under the Act furnish to his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees.”
https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1903/1903.1
Ms. Covid Vaccine Holdout works for Big Bank, with 3000 employees, at its Smalltown branch along with one other employee, who was fully vaccinated against Covid.
Is that other employee likely to suffer death or serious physical harm if Ms. Covid Vaccine Holdout continues working at that branch, Secretary Walsh?
Is it not true that your vaccination mandate is too broad, Secretary Walsh?
6 posted on 9/15/2021, 11:38:05 PM by Brian Griffin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse
To: Brian Griffin
Causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm. 78% of the deaths from the coof, according to the CDC, are, IIRC, among those over age 65. Since the overall death rate is only 0.3%, (three-tenths of ONE percent) the risk to those under 65 is roughly 1/16 of one percent.
That’s not “likely”. And if they go that route, start pushing them on invasive testing for AIDS, tuberculosis, and Dutch Elm Disease.
9 posted on 9/16/2021, 12:29:24 AM by grey_whiskers ((The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
To: Brian Griffin
Then Congress can’t require different treatment for vaxed and unvaxed.
12 posted on 9/16/2021, 7:25:28 AM by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
To: Brian Griffin
And vaxxed and unvaxxed can’t have “separate but equal” facilities.
13 posted on 9/16/2021, 7:35:55 AM by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
Melian wrote:
“I’m wondering if the vaxx increases Adrenochrome levels in the blood of the young.
Culling the old and making the blood of the young even more “useful” may have been the goals.”
IIRC the theory was that the substance was gathered during times of the victim’s extreme fear and stress.
So having had a shot may not factor into it.
There’s that number 17 again...
.
.
.
Melian wrote:
Bobby Piton
@bobbypiton
9h
·
The next 17 days might be some of the most important days in our History as a Nation.
Brace yourselves...
Evil will be exposed and with prayer and Patriots rising:
God’s Will Shall Be Done
We Win when God Wins!
https://gab.com/bobbypiton/posts/106939115332634505
The Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1590 et seq., 29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) requires, in part, that every employer covered under the Act furnish to his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards...
So OSHA regulates /the employers/ and NOT the employees.
Correspondingly, it does not allow for “regulation” of consumers in Interstate Trade..
Nota Bene.
Excellent catch, Cletus !!
Related thread BTT; note the response by hidenbiden minion:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3995359/posts
The Republican National Committee also announced it was suing “to protect Americans and their liberties” if the proposed rule change were to go into effect.
In response to Republican pushback, White House senior adviser Cedric Richmond, a former Democratic congressman from Louisiana, told CNN the White House expected the opposition.
He said, “… those governors that stand in the way, I think, it was very clear from the president’s tone today that he will run over them. And it is important. It’s not for political purposes. It’s to save the lives of American people. And so, we won’t let one or two individuals stand in the way. We will always err on the side of protecting the American people.”
And note this comment (WLM says all states should push back):
To: White Lives Matter
And so should employees and employers! If OSHA codifies a rule regarding these vaccines/tests, it becomes the employers financial responsibility and they cannot discriminate against someone who is not vaxxed.
6 posted on 9/16/2021, 6:08:46 AM by EBH (Never trust the government or a politician . 1776-2021 May God Save Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
“If that’s ot bad enough, hospital staff and some relatives down there are trying to take her on a guilt trip for not being vaxxed. Not helpful. Needless to say, she’s a wreck.”
There’s suggesting, and then there’s a point where “hospital staff” needs to shut the heck up. And after/during the death of one’s son, is the time to STFU.
Iver vs virus mark
Hmmm
That puts us into (RED?)October
7
You raise an interesting point regarding Ivermectin. I’ve done the preventive regimen for 4 weeks, have proved no Immediate ill effects. But maybe I should back off and just set up a small supply for when/if I get symptomatic. I mean, if I get the ‘rona or even a cold, it should be effective in helping beat the virus.
Short of that, I’ll be redoubling my efforts with maintaining a healthy dose of the necessary vitamins, C, D, Zinc, and exercising. A healthier body wards off disease better than a weak one.
Oh, and quercetin.
So much to remember regarding the ‘rona...
Moar...
...furnish to his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized ⁴hazards”.
By rule, these “hazards” must ve endemic to the employer’s workplace.
“Endemic” meaning -as a result of-
OSHA cannot regulate employee chemical exposure practices in an workplace that has no such exposures.COVID is NOT endemic to the workplace.
Question...can OSHA regulate workplaces regarding employee diarrhea?
On that vein, and apologies if this has been posted before, here’s a good video (about an hour long) about the vaccine with some factual information. Video is from March, 2021...
Just what I have been looking for, many thanks!!
Mark
Trick question. Even though the expectation value of the right-hand button is 50 times that of the left hand, half the time you get nothing. But with the right hand button -- almost everyone would see a large, immediate leap in their lifestyle. So while it's trying to act like the marshmallow experiment, it's not. The guaranteed payoff is much larger than a marshmallow. The deferred choice doesn't always pay off. The correct answer is "both". (Kobayashi Maru, break the rules. 😉)
Thanks greeneyes.
Cletus.D.Yokel wrote:
“Moar...
...furnish to his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized ⁴hazards”.
By rule, these “hazards” must ve endemic to the employer’s workplace.
“Endemic” meaning -as a result of-
OSHA cannot regulate employee chemical exposure practices in an workplace that has no such exposures.COVID is NOT endemic to the workplace.
Question...can OSHA regulate workplaces regarding employee diarrhea?
Since diarrhea isn’t endemic (it doesn’t result from the workplace) it comes in with the employee, and thus isn’t regulated by OSHA.
Same applies to covid, it’s not resulting from the workplace, it is not endemic, therefore OSHA can’t regulate it.
.
.
(Related:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3995365/posts?page=52#52
To: noiseman
Another good question to be asking
If the vaccine is totally safe and effective, why are the makers immune to being sued if you are hurt by it?
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html
You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe Covid vaccine side effects. The government likely won’t compensate you for damages either. Under the PREP Act, companies like Pfizer and Moderna have total immunity from liability if something unintentionally goes wrong with their vaccines.Dec 17, 2020
52 posted on 9/16/2021, 3:22:36 AM by MNJohnnie (They would have abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
That’s what I am doing. I have been taking the preventative dose one day a week for 3-4 months. I have one dose left in this tube that I will take next week and then stop. That leaves me with 13 tubes. I’ll continue with the supplements.
Here, then, is my position:
Unless i have been issued a license or permit by a government agency, I am under no regulatory requirements and oversight.
YMMV
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.