Posted on 08/31/2021 12:00:43 AM PDT by weston
Cute
In June a woman alleged a person exposed their penis to women & girls at Wi Spa. Liberal press declared it a transphobic hoax. Story was supposed to go away but I investigated & found charges were discreetly filed. The suspect is a registered sex offender. https://t.co/8p3w5dvGvk— Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) September 2, 2021
Then wouldn't it follow that a baby, once self aware and capable of reasoning, would have "a sacred right" to have the mother aborted?
.
That will make you stop and think.
Bannon and John Fredericks were talking about this on War Room this morning.
Dims in a MELT DOWN!
“The election gambit that’s sending Georgia Democrats into a frenzy”
By MAYA KING
09/02/2021 04:30 AM EDT
Georgia Republicans say it’s merely an attempt to improve a chronically mismanaged elections administration.
But a newly-formed election review panel in Atlanta’s Fulton County is nevertheless sparking outrage — and paranoia — from Democrats who believe it’s the GOP’s first step toward commandeering the levers of election administration in the counties that powered Democratic gains last year.
The belief is not entirely unfounded. Under Georgia’s restrictive new voting law, if an election review panel finds evidence of unresolved errors or a breach of election law in a county’s election oversight since 2018, the state can disband the local board and replace it with a state-appointed superintendent. That figure would assume key decisions like voting locations, precinct staffing and vote certification.
In the GOP’s action in Fulton County, Democrats see the makings of a grand design to take control of local election offices in the metro Atlanta region, which would give Republicans the power to challenge election results, hold up certification and announce investigations in the counties that produce the most Democratic votes. In other words, it would enable them to execute the pieces of the Trump playbook that failed in 2020.
While the law only allows election boards in four counties at a time to be disbanded, that would be more than enough to swing a statewide election if those counties happened to be Fulton, Gwinnett, Cobb and DeKalb — the state’s four most populous counties — where the bulk of Georgia’s Democratic votes are concentrated.
“It’s hard to see how this isn’t just a cursory act before the takeover,” said Erick Allen, a Democratic state representative and candidate for lieutenant governor whose district sits in Cobb County, north of Atlanta. “I don’t know anyone that’s thinking that this is not going to lead to what we think.”
Fulton and neighboring Gwinnett, DeKalb and Cobb counties played key roles in turning the longtime red state into one of the most competitive battlegrounds in the nation. In a state that hasn’t voted for a Democratic presidential nominee since 1996, those four counties combined netted Joe Biden a 625,000 vote margin over Donald Trump, enough to offset Trump’s rural performance in Georgia.
That metro Atlanta coalition of Black, Latino and Asian voters also fueled the success of Sens. Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff, whose campaigns ginned up historic turnout in the region during both the November general election and January 2021 runoffs.
“Hanging over our heads, we’re thinking, ‘Big Brother’s watching,‘” said Jacquelyn Bettadapur, chair of the Cobb County Democratic party. “If [Republicans] don’t like what they see, are they gonna roll into town and want to do a performance review?”
Republicans have largely dismissed Democratic concerns as overblown. Senate President Pro Tem Butch Miller, who is running for lieutenant governor, said that his statehouse colleagues have not yet made plans to establish election review panels in the counties around metro Atlanta.
“We will get to those counties as time comes, if that’s appropriate, but we’re not going after [them],” Miller, who co-sponsored the legislation, said. “There’s no, quote, hit list, unquote. We’re just trying to take care of the business at hand.”
The Fulton County review was initiated after Republican lawmakers sent two letters to the state elections board last month, citing long lines, administrative issues and late distribution of absentee ballots during the 2018 and 2020 elections.
It’s true that there is a high bar to taking over a county’s election board. While creating a review panel requires little more than a letter to the state elections board from at least one representative and one senator who represent an individual county, the process of disbanding a county election board is cumbersome.
It requires the review panel to find and document a breach of election law or multiple instances of wrongdoing over the last two years of elections before the state election board decides whether or not to vote to disband the county board. The wrongdoing is defined as “demonstrated malfeasance or gross negligence.”
Democrats, however, point to the partisan backdrop behind these efforts, which come after Trump pressured state elections officials to “find” 12,000 nonexistent votes in Fulton County in 2020. An independent elections monitor had already found no evidence of fraud in the county.
They note that Republicans will have a majority on Fulton County’s three-person election review panel and envision a troubling specter of white, conservative state election officials taking over county election boards in heavily Democratic, racially diverse counties.
“All these things combined could have a negative impact on the minority vote in Fulton County,” said Rob Pitts, chair of the Fulton County Board of Elections. “And we are the reason for Biden winning, Ossoff winning and Warnock winning.”
Statewide, Democrats are piecing together a strategy to fight the law, as activists vow to oppose it and fundraise to bring more suits against it. In Congress, Warnock and Ossoff have proposed a slimmed-down version of the For the People Act that would establish stricter guidelines for disbanding county boards of elections.
READ MORE.......
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/09/02/georgia-democrats-election-gambit-508681
He's The Real Nowhere Man
Wandering 'Round His Nowhere Land
Making All His Nowhere Plans For Nobody
Don't Know How He Landed Here
Knows Not Where He's Going To
Doesn't Give A Care For You And Me
...
Well, yes it is, to Satanists. Now that we are inclusive and everything.
Nasty is saying it is our “sacred right” to kill our unborn children when we don’t want the.
And she does know what she is saying.
The Gates of Hell will open wide for this evil 😈 piece of crap.
the=them
A group of overweight, angry women held a protest outside the Texas State Capitol on Thursday following the Supreme Court decision.
The women were chanting, “Bans off our bodies!”
It would have been interesting to have them explain forced vaccinations.
Good article. Thanks for posting.
WOW! Can the victims sue the government?
This is great!
Fitting song.
😪
What about a retroactive post-partum abortion for Pelosi herself?
.
CodeMonkeyZ [Ron Watkins]
Forwarded from Garrett Ziegler
MacIsaacVsTwitter.zip 262.7 MB
So the laptop shop owner's case against Twitter for defamation was dismissed with prejudice earlier this week. Such BS. Although, to be frank, I would have had my counsel argue for defamation per quod, NOT defamation per se. The former allows one to argue that one need not be explicitly named to be defamed. Legal skullduggery aside, the decision was pharisaical nonsense not unlike we saw in the courts during the coup.
The bottom line is this: Twitter carried water for Hunter and the Biden Crime Syndicate by blocking the NYPost stories about Hunter and the contents of his laptop by saying they were "hacked materials." Twitter, of course, pulled that out of thin air. I went on PACER and, with your support for Marco Polo, bought all of the documents from the case. Here they are in a (albeit large) zip file.
Happy reading. t.me/CodeMonkeyZ /1389
So MUCH hypocrisy!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.