Posted on 08/04/2021 11:38:05 AM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T TheConservativeParty ]
DEADLY SHOTS! Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID 'Vaccine' (odysee.com)
My Notes: Stew Peters previously hosted Dr. Jane Ruby in a video posted to Free Republic titled, Stew Peters: HORRIFIC FINDINGS IN THE BLOOD OF THE VACCINATED [Dr. Ruby, 12 minute video] in which they discussed the work of the Spanish Researchers who exposed the Pfizer vaccine for containing poisonous Graphene Oxide (GO).
Link to the Spanish research posted to Free Republic: La Quinta Columna: Analysis of vaccination vial confirms presence of graphene nanoparticles
Those same researchers have since found Graphene Oxide in the Moderna vaccine and now the Aztrazeneca vaccine is being tested for it. USA Today and other Cabal media attacked Dr. Ruby and Stew Peters, calling them liars.
Other physicians working to share information about the vaccines in the face of censorship confirmed the report by La Quinta Columna.
Despite confirmation, the assaults continue, so today’s interview with a former Pfizer Employee is designed to further document the poisonous contents of the Pfizer vaccine. People want to know the facts.
Today's guest, Karen Kingston who is a former Pfizer employee and is now an analyst for the pharmaceutal and medical device industries, has come forward to walk through the documents which demonstrate that the vaccine contains toxic substances.
Poisonous Graphene Oxide is present in the ‘vaccines’ but the drug companies declared the poison a trade secret and are therefore not required list it on the ingredients documentation. It is still possible to prove the presence of Graphene Oxide by parsing information in related documents.
Karen Kingston provides discusses a few of the publicly available source documents. Here's an example.
Note the PEGylated lipids contain graphene oxide supplied by SINOPEG in China.
Stew Peters asked questions about the properties of Graphene Oxide to pin down why the material can be used for conducting electricity and creating a wifi connection. Kingston adds that the vaccines are poisonous and can destroy children, and with them, the next generation.
She said while the intention of the repeated ‘boosters’ is to build up lethal dosing. There is no other purpose for the vaccines.
Here is the text posted below the video at the odessy webpage:
July 28, 2021 EXCLUSIVE! Karen Kingston, a former Pfizer employee and current analyst for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries, came forward with indisputable documentation that should be shared with the ENTIRE WORLD!
The inoculation being referred to as 'COVID Vaccines' is a poisonous death sentence, and nobody should subject themselves to the shots.
The video is also available on Rumble.
DEADLY SHOTS! Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID 'Vaccine' (rumble.com)
Only if the distribution of deaths is uniform among all clinical / societal cohorts.
And you know as well as I do, it isn't.
You'd need to find the most important confounding factors and do a weighted average survival rate over them.
I think the vaxxes are made from chemtrails
When you make up that much propaganda at one time I would have to clear my afternoon to go document the truth in order to counter your ‘stuff’.
Is this panic mode for you? Your side is being exposed all over the place and it’s time for you to just start drafting fake news and jettisoning out the hatch?
I don’t get to just fabricate as I go like you do. I have to look up sources etc. and it takes me forevah.
Prayers up - may God help all discern the truth, even when you post.
It’s just flat out weird how you people ignore facts and data and every day you start anew as if your imaginary world is the only one that exists.
I’ve posted evidence to you, and you always post as if no one has ever provided a scrap of informaiton etc.
That’s the problem with the MSM too. Every day, in every conversation or report, repeatedly using the world ‘baseless’ no matter how much documented evdence there is.
Your people don’t acknowledge anyone outside Fauci/CDC approved sources. We can show you just how evil they are and the next day - you’re fresh as a daisy pretending there has never been any information released that could concievalby make even one idividual doubt ‘the narrative.’ The degree you create that Matrixx is creepy, actually.
“Several typical mechanisms underlying graphene (oxide) nanomaterials toxicity have been revealed, for instance, physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis. In these mechanisms, (toll-like receptors-) TLR-, transforming growth factor β- (TGF-β-) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) dependent-pathways are involved in the signalling pathway network, and oxidative stress plays a crucial role in these pathways. Many experiments have shown that graphene (oxide) nanomaterials have toxic side effects in many biological applications, but more in-depth study of toxicity mechanisms is needed.[79] According to the USA FDA, graphene, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide elicit toxic effects both in vitro and in vivo.[80] Graphene-family nanomaterials (GFN) are not approved by the USA FDA for human consumption.”
A. What purpose would the toxic poison graphene oxide serve in a vaccine?
B. Why haven’t hundreds of millions of folks who’ve been vaccinated with supposedly graphene-oxide-containing vaccines sickened and died from “physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis”?
This whole graphene oxide nonsense reminds of the chem-trail nonsense ...
I am comfortable assuming you are posting good ol’ MSM ‘debunks’ like the ones used to debunk every thing PResident Trump ever said or did. Your quote is not accurate and you don’t link it so it looks like you’re posting FAKE NEWS.
That's incorrect. First, Influenza virus is as closely related to SARS-CoV-2 as humans are to snails. They aren't even in the same phylum. So the idea that any test wouldn't be able to distinguish one from the other is absurd. And the RT-PCR test absolutely does distinguish between coronaviruses. In fact, it's specifically triggered by nucleotide sequences unique to SARS-CoV-2. They're what distinguish SARS-CoV-2 from SARS-CoV-1 (SARS2003) and MERS-CoV (MERS2012).
"Anyhow, we do know for sure in the U.S. 99.97% survival for the unvaccinated that tests positive."
No, that number is 99% - 99.35%.
"Keep in mind too the CDC admitted that 94% of their Covid deaths in the U.S. had other morbidity’s. Meaning cancer, heart attacks, etc... That means only 6% was from Covid 19 alone."
No, you're confused about what they said because you don't understand how a US Standard Certificate of Death is filled out. Section 32 Part 1 lists the causal chain of events from the Underlying Cause of Death (UCoD) to the immediate cause of death. For COVID-19, this might look like hypoxemia due to ARDS due to COVID-19, for example. What you're conflating here is Section 32 Part II, which lists other conditions which may complicate survival, but are NOT part of the chain of events leading directly to death.
Diabetes is a very common one here. A person can live for 80 years with diabetes. But someone who has diabetes and contracts COVID-19 will have a far higher risk of severe illness and death. Diabetes didn't kill that patient; COVID-19 did. What diabetes did was complicate survival.
It’s a she, not a he.
Ruby is not a psychologist.
I don’t know if you noticed but doctors speaking out against the adverse events/damage the vaccines are creating tend to lose their jobs so they are funneling information to spokes persons without a medical license to lose.
Forbes? Why not invite me to read The HUffington Post?
This is information war. They don’t like the truth getting out so the DEEP STATE uses it’s MSM to flood the zone with fake proof. WEre you watching during Trump’s administration? How much programming and published information did you find during those four years? I think I saw maybe about 5 minutes of MSM that wasn’t openingly trying to get him impeached or arrested.
So now it’s time to ‘protect’ Covid by any means necessary....
The jabs are NOT vaccines. There is no live or dead Covid 19 virus in the jabs. What you took was a rushed out (9 months) non FDA approved experimental mRNA gene therapy. A gene therapy is a therapeutic. Which means it is temporary. Hence, you will need boosters for the rest of your life.
Polio, small pox and other vaccines have live or dead viruses in the shots, and depends on your immune system you have had your entire life to learn it and defeat it. By the way, never heard of anyone catching polio or small pox after getting the vaccine?
For the record, most of the people that are waiting for the trials to complete (2023 which is still rushed normally 10 year time period) or have religious objections have had vaccines and believe in vaccine not mRNA gene therapies. I have probably had more vaccines than most people. This was because I was in the military.
You do know not a single mRNA was ever approved by the FDA in the last 20 years? This is because they all failed in the trials. For instance, Moderna has never even had any thing approved by the FDA ever.
I think if we people want to gamble their life with a rushed out mRNA gene therapy, then that is their choice. However, to try to force people against their will like Jim Jones is evil. That is what the Nazis did to the people in the camps. They forced them to take experimental. Please read up on the Nuremberg code.
If the mRNA gene therapy works, then why would any of the jabbed fear the unvaccinated? Keep in mind viruses are seasonal. The same Covid 19 virus in different countries, (delta = India, Lamda = Peru) again are seasonal like the flu. Most people that are still around a year and half later have natural immunity by now. This is when we were told millions of Americans would be dead in the first 3 months, and there was nothing anyone could do about it. That never happened. Per the CDC own questionable numbers 99.97% of the “unvaccinated” will live if they get Covid.
Your posts are always a waste of time, but you people seem extra sensitive now that evidence is piling up against Graphene Oxide.
PUshing the narrative the way you do, you’d make more money working directly for the MSM. Just saying...
A. What purpose would the toxic poison graphene oxide serve in a vaccine?
Watch the video for the answer.
B. Why haven’t hundreds of millions of folks who’ve been vaccinated with supposedly graphene-oxide-containing vaccines sickened and died from “physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis”?
Watch the video for the answer.
Agreed that a blanket US based IFR applied globally gives only a ballpark figured and more accurate numbers could be gleaned through increased cohort stratification by risk factors. But for a quick back-of-the-napkin number, it provides a range that’s pretty close to what you’d come up with when doing a whole lot more work. Western Europe sees similar IFR numbers to the US. Latin/South America, Asia, and Sub-Saharan Africa are the larger question marks, but it’s not like they’re going to see 10% IFR or 0.00001% IFR suddenly. They’re still humans. So if the IFR for Africa shifts to between 0.5% and 0.85% and the IFR for Asia shifts to 0.7% - 1.1%, we’re still talking about very similar numbers.
You mean that thing you guys made up based on one lab receiving a mystery package whose origin they couldn't confirm?
That wild claim that hasn't had a single shred of evidence to back it up?
Yeah, real worried about that one... /s
Why do the conspiracy people always love their videos so much? It's never "here's an answer with actual documentation from real sources that matches up with observable reality", it's always "watch this 4 hour long video presented by a guy trying to sell you stuff or cash in on ad revenue!"
For under twenties, "survival" is indeed close to 99.99 if you are infected. By the time you get to age 50 it is down to 99. Above 70 it is down to 90. (all rough numbers).
It does vary with health. Utah over all survival is well over 99% -- healthy Mormons. Some eastern states and other countries it is below 98.
SO you have to look at who you are and where your area is. It ain't the Black Death, but it ain't the sniffles, either.
If I told you that 99 out of 100 people who cross in the middle of the street survive -- you still might consider crossing at a crosswalk.
It should indeed be mostly your choice as to how to approach it, but beating your chest and saying "I am Invincible" isn't the best look.
Think AGE, Einstain.
Lots of the developing world (== higher birth rates) have far lower % of population over age 70, which is where most of the deaths happen; as well as far less, hmm, diabetes (no chugging of high fructose corn syrup 24x7).
Okay well you can argue with the CDC then that the PCR tests are reliable and against the PCR inventor Kary Mullis. The PCR tests only look for symptoms. It cannot tell you the difference between the flu and Covid 19. This is why it will be gone by the end of the year. So probably most of the positives were the annual flu and not Covid.
Haha!
You are the one confused. Again you are mixing and matching the numbers. It 99.97% in the United States. In the U.K. it is 99.95% and in the rest of the world it is 99.35% that you keep quoting. A lot of the differences is based on how clean societies are in different countries around the world. Hence, the different numbers.
Most people that died from Covid 19 over the last year and half in the U.S. lived longer than the average person life span.
As for conflating numbers. You are very confused or have been deeply misled. It is no secret that most of the Covid deaths have been from all sorts of various deaths. Yes to including diabetes, cancer, etc...
Think about it this way. We are told in the U.S. the unvaccinated is 99.97% chance survival IF you get it. It is also admitted that if you took the jab, then you can still get it. So how much does this experimental protect you? It has to be only .01 to .02 at best. That is what they are trying to sell the public. No thanks I will count on what God gave me, and not some experimental that was souped up in a lab by Big Pharma will not tell you what is in it, and are not liable.
I don’t disagree with you. I also think we should pay a lot more attention to the effects beyond just “survival”. For example, 5% of people infected wind up in the hospital. That’s no joke and a huge drain on resources normally used for keeping other people alive. 3% wind up in the ICU. And somewhere between 20 - 35% of those infected will suffer linger effects which can be significant and are not confined exclusively to those who are old or ill.
Oonagh Cousins was training for 35 hours a week as a British Olympic team rower. Now can’t train more than 20 minutes at a time at light intensity. Priscilla Loomis is a US Olympic high jumper who missed 8 weeks of training due to chest pains and difficulty breathing. Georgia Wilson is a professional soccer player who caught COVID-19 last year and spent the entire summer so out of breath she couldn’t run across the soccer field anymore. The Big 10 does regular heart monitoring of their athletes and found that 2.3% of the athletes who recovered from COVID-19 had myocarditis.
One thing I do notice is that the people who are dismissive of all this are never people who are dealing directly with lots of sick people.
Why do the conspiracy people always love their videos so much? It’s never “here’s an answer with actual documentation from real sources that matches up with observable reality”, it’s always “watch this 4 hour long video presented by a guy trying to sell you stuff or cash in on ad revenue!”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Could you stop being a gas-lighting whiny baby for 5 minutes or is that too much to ask?
You’re doing it again. You’re pretending the obvious doesn’t exist and never did. You know that mainstream media and publications have closed ranks so that conservatives have to use alternative media but you pretend that’s a fable and we just naturally ‘love’ videos.
Then you pretend footage of her holding up documents, like the image I posted showing the specific chemcial in the ‘shots’ that contains graphene oxide doesn’t exist. All because it’s inconvenient for you, you’re just going to tell people there isn’t a photo of a document for them to look at on the page.
And then a whopper - you say it’s always a 4 hour video, and this one is 20 minutes or so. You say it’s just people trying to seel stuff, it’s about sales, but commercial television has far more commercials.
Nothing you say is valid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.