Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 2aProtectsTheRest

Okay well you can argue with the CDC then that the PCR tests are reliable and against the PCR inventor Kary Mullis. The PCR tests only look for symptoms. It cannot tell you the difference between the flu and Covid 19. This is why it will be gone by the end of the year. So probably most of the positives were the annual flu and not Covid.

Haha!

You are the one confused. Again you are mixing and matching the numbers. It 99.97% in the United States. In the U.K. it is 99.95% and in the rest of the world it is 99.35% that you keep quoting. A lot of the differences is based on how clean societies are in different countries around the world. Hence, the different numbers.

Most people that died from Covid 19 over the last year and half in the U.S. lived longer than the average person life span.

As for conflating numbers. You are very confused or have been deeply misled. It is no secret that most of the Covid deaths have been from all sorts of various deaths. Yes to including diabetes, cancer, etc...

Think about it this way. We are told in the U.S. the unvaccinated is 99.97% chance survival IF you get it. It is also admitted that if you took the jab, then you can still get it. So how much does this experimental protect you? It has to be only .01 to .02 at best. That is what they are trying to sell the public. No thanks I will count on what God gave me, and not some experimental that was souped up in a lab by Big Pharma will not tell you what is in it, and are not liable.


58 posted on 08/04/2021 1:13:47 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Enlightened1
"The PCR tests only look for symptoms."

That's completely wrong. The RT-PCR test triggers based on the presence of nucleic acid sequences unique to SARS-CoV-2. It doesn't "look for symptoms", whatever that means. You take a sample of material from the nasal cavity and test to see whether RNA which is only found in the SARS-CoV-2 virus is present. That's how it works.

"Again you are mixing and matching the numbers. It 99.97% in the United States."

Wrong. Here is the current Pandemic Planning Scenario guide which stratifies IFR into different age groups. If you then weight those age group IFRs against the US population statistics from the US Census Bureau, you find an IFR of ~1%. If you go back to the previous Pandemic Planning Scenario guide (before the IFR was stratified), you see it was listed at 0.65% for the entire US population as a whole.

Hence, 0.65% - 1% IFR for the US population. Or 99% - 99.35% survival rate.

63 posted on 08/04/2021 1:25:54 PM PDT by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

“Okay well you can argue with the CDC then that the PCR tests are reliable and against the PCR inventor Kary Mullis. The PCR tests only look for symptoms. It cannot tell you the difference between the flu and Covid 19. This is why it will be gone by the end of the year. So probably most of the positives were the annual flu and not Covid.”


https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/scicheck-viral-posts-misrepresent-cdc-announcement-on-covid-19-pcr-test/?fbclid=IwAR0PMPD1R2wPxAg-kpgyLfsupDBt8dyJXD_Sl-nVvtLQW0lx7MeYHXmPA8g


67 posted on 08/04/2021 1:32:26 PM PDT by phoneman08 (qwiyrqweopigradfdz oncm,.dadfjl,dz )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson