That's incorrect. First, Influenza virus is as closely related to SARS-CoV-2 as humans are to snails. They aren't even in the same phylum. So the idea that any test wouldn't be able to distinguish one from the other is absurd. And the RT-PCR test absolutely does distinguish between coronaviruses. In fact, it's specifically triggered by nucleotide sequences unique to SARS-CoV-2. They're what distinguish SARS-CoV-2 from SARS-CoV-1 (SARS2003) and MERS-CoV (MERS2012).
"Anyhow, we do know for sure in the U.S. 99.97% survival for the unvaccinated that tests positive."
No, that number is 99% - 99.35%.
"Keep in mind too the CDC admitted that 94% of their Covid deaths in the U.S. had other morbidity’s. Meaning cancer, heart attacks, etc... That means only 6% was from Covid 19 alone."
No, you're confused about what they said because you don't understand how a US Standard Certificate of Death is filled out. Section 32 Part 1 lists the causal chain of events from the Underlying Cause of Death (UCoD) to the immediate cause of death. For COVID-19, this might look like hypoxemia due to ARDS due to COVID-19, for example. What you're conflating here is Section 32 Part II, which lists other conditions which may complicate survival, but are NOT part of the chain of events leading directly to death.
Diabetes is a very common one here. A person can live for 80 years with diabetes. But someone who has diabetes and contracts COVID-19 will have a far higher risk of severe illness and death. Diabetes didn't kill that patient; COVID-19 did. What diabetes did was complicate survival.
For under twenties, "survival" is indeed close to 99.99 if you are infected. By the time you get to age 50 it is down to 99. Above 70 it is down to 90. (all rough numbers).
It does vary with health. Utah over all survival is well over 99% -- healthy Mormons. Some eastern states and other countries it is below 98.
SO you have to look at who you are and where your area is. It ain't the Black Death, but it ain't the sniffles, either.
If I told you that 99 out of 100 people who cross in the middle of the street survive -- you still might consider crossing at a crosswalk.
It should indeed be mostly your choice as to how to approach it, but beating your chest and saying "I am Invincible" isn't the best look.
Okay well you can argue with the CDC then that the PCR tests are reliable and against the PCR inventor Kary Mullis. The PCR tests only look for symptoms. It cannot tell you the difference between the flu and Covid 19. This is why it will be gone by the end of the year. So probably most of the positives were the annual flu and not Covid.
Haha!
You are the one confused. Again you are mixing and matching the numbers. It 99.97% in the United States. In the U.K. it is 99.95% and in the rest of the world it is 99.35% that you keep quoting. A lot of the differences is based on how clean societies are in different countries around the world. Hence, the different numbers.
Most people that died from Covid 19 over the last year and half in the U.S. lived longer than the average person life span.
As for conflating numbers. You are very confused or have been deeply misled. It is no secret that most of the Covid deaths have been from all sorts of various deaths. Yes to including diabetes, cancer, etc...
Think about it this way. We are told in the U.S. the unvaccinated is 99.97% chance survival IF you get it. It is also admitted that if you took the jab, then you can still get it. So how much does this experimental protect you? It has to be only .01 to .02 at best. That is what they are trying to sell the public. No thanks I will count on what God gave me, and not some experimental that was souped up in a lab by Big Pharma will not tell you what is in it, and are not liable.