|
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 06/24/2021 4:22:50 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
childishness - bagster, et al. |
Posted on 06/17/2021 11:32:47 AM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
https://youtu.be/dzabuGq1wIE?t=78
I don’t want to be colored blind.
Let’s take a good hard look at each other, are we done? good... now let’s get things done.
All I did was beg humbly to take the acrimonious discussion on to another thread.
Are you kidding me? Stop your pearl clutching before I have to come to the new thread. When the grown adult posters told you no they were not going to comply with your wishes, you wrote this:
It. Is. Not. Q. Related.
It only creates dissension and argument.
When someone writes a word with a period and then another word with a period, and then a third word, with a period, well it pretty much drips with condescension.
That very sentence causes disssension and argument.
But, you think you’re the victim? Then you went on to post to another poster that I was privately sending you nastygrams. You wrote to another poster “It” is sending me nastygrams”. I didn’t start aprivate message to you, you private messaged me! Did you think I was not to respond?
Yellow, I want you to read this again. After sending me a private message, she said to another poster “IT” is sending me nasty grams. I did no such thing. All I did was respond to her, using her own words and disagree with her. That seems to be the common narrative here. You cannot disagree with some of the posters on this forum because if you do, they will write stuff to other posters lying about you.
I’m sorry if many of you are used to people just going along with your bee, but I am going to fight back. If you don’t want to hear from me, then don’t tell others what they can and can’t post, don’t respond to me, and don’t talk about me behind my back.
I’m not going to go along with this type of bad behavior anymore. Eventually, others who are leaders will join in in putting a stop to this nonsense.
###########
You said the above.
I say the following:
Your hysterical mambo jumbo is Messi g up the thread. Time to hush up. I haven’t seen a lot of support for your proposed Bagster jihad. Time to drop it.
You guys are just hilarious. I have responded to every poster that has responded to me. You know, normal. I have also responded to those who have lied about me behind my back. I have responded to bagster exactly once. He has posted to me either 10 or 11 times. Why don’t you tell bagster to knock it off?
Since when did so many on the Q theads become Karens?
Why don't you know? You're the Mother of All Karens, Snivelpuss.
I know I am.
Point of parliamentary procedure, Snivelpuss.
If you got beef with me, why are you talking to everybody BUT me. Ya skurd?
And why can't Norsky fight his own battles?
ps. Snivelpuss, if you gonna insist on talkin' about me, then you're just gonna have to get used to hearing from me.
It is the way of the pack.
Awesome memory you got there.
Hey stylin, I see that you are a Marine and served in Nam. I am fortunate enough to have 5 older brothers. 3 of which were Marines, and all saw combat. One in Korea, and 2 in Nam. I’m not as old as this may make me sound. I am the youngest of 10. My oldest brother was married with a child before I was even born. LOL.
The problem with my posting my PM’s to her is that I copied a lot of her posts in my responses. That is why I told her she is more than welcome to post my responses. I would hate to break FR rules and post a private PM that wasn’t approved by the sender.
She did write this to a fellow poster in post 1900:
“It should also stop freepmailing nastygrams.”
If you see to whom she is responding, this comment is clearly about me. I guess she didn’t think I would see it. The very idea that she would call me “It” seems pretty nasty to me. Maybe I’m wrong.
When the word nasty is used like this, I would assume my posts to her would have name calling in them, or lying, or cussing. Not the case. ASk her if I can release both.
To recap: When LJ, acting like a Karen, couldn’t get norsky to agree to stop fighting back against bagster, she then condescending wrote:
This.is.not.q.related.
Several posters told her it was q related, and that q talked about satan and evil many times, so then the goalposts changed.
Then she said they were talking about religion and theology, and that type of talk started division.
I guess bagster was talking religion to norsky when he wrote this:
Now, take your false, sanctimonious, unsolicited piety and go get your f’ng shine box, Padre.
Do you suppose it’s the padre at the end that makes it a religious discussion? LOL
:You can go back and read for yourself. There was no conversation about theology going on, just norsky pointing out that demons and satan exist, and bagster belittling him for it. One more point, I have no affiliation with norsky. As far as I know, we have never even had a conversation before.
Then she freepmailed me. I responded. She freepamailed me again, I responded. She freepmailed me again, I responded. She freepmailed me telling me to STOP FREEPMAILING HER. I responded.
That’s when the flying monkeys showed up. You know the drill. Stop disrupting the thread! Take it off line! (I really love that one, I am to be castigated on a public forum and then respond in private?) I don’t think so. Every comment was addressed solely to me. Not bagster, not LJ, just me.
Last point. If you go back and look at what bagster wrote to norsky, and then to me, it is really troubling. He talks about how he has been so very patient in not speaking up about religion in the last 4 years. He also wrote:
For four years I have listened to people hype their religous beliefs (crazy or not). I don’t recall one time telling any of them they were ‘wrong’, then proceed to lecture them on what was ‘right’.
Do I get a ‘thank you very much’, Uncle Bagster? No. I get talked to like a two year old that ‘just doesn’t understand’.
But I’m the bully, huh?
This statement is just so creepy.
I’ve been following the conversation(s) - probably a few others are following also.
I now understand about no posting the PMs.
Youngest of 10? whoa...
3 Marines in one family ?...
I had a spiritual adviser that never took my side on anything - even when I was right. Drove me nutz.
His response was ...you want to be right? or do you want to be happy?
He would then relate an incident in his life where he chose one path over another and where it turned out well or not so well.
He passed on and I miss him a lot. I found a new spiritual advisor and he is cut from the same mold.
The point? do I want to be right or do I want to be happy?
Semper Fi to a Marine family.
I do thank her.
And I didn’t address you.
So why would I send u a private message?
****************************************************************************
Ha - Sounded like a complaint. Very strange thank you.
Well, gee you weren’t addressed on this topic either were you, or did I miss that? And yet you went to the new thread to create more flak.
A PM or festival - consideration for other people on the thread, as I’m sure you know.
Many thanks!
RE: you were not addressed -from Imgflip Meme Generator
***************************************************
And in the melee on this thread, neither was Aurorales, and yet stirred the pot on the new thread. Eye Roll.
His response was ...you want to be right? or do you want to be happy?
Sounds like a great advisor. I was a supervisor in a clean room mfg. plant for 35 years. My saying was very similar.
Do you want to be right, or do you want to be successful. Every time I was in a situation that needed some empathy, or encouragement, I would come back to that philosophy. It served me well.
Currently Do you want to be right or do you want to be happy would be more appropriate for me. I just can’t sit back and go along to get along anymore. I’m not going to start any fights, but I won’t run from them either. So, to make myself happy, I have to fight back. I hope others can understand.
My boss always says when you have the choice of being right or being kind, choose kindness.
IT IS NOT ENOUGH TO MERELY ACCEPT BIG SIBLING
IT IS ALSO MORALLY OBLIGATED TO LOVE SHIM
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
