|
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 06/24/2021 4:22:50 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
childishness - bagster, et al. |
Posted on 06/17/2021 11:32:47 AM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
You left our thread in angry disappointment once before. It seems you are even more disappointed this time.
Wrong. I disagreed with bagster on how the police should honor their oaths. I was respectful, and stated my case as well I could. I was then called every name in the book by several on this thread. I sent you a private message asking for your help because it seemed like previously we had some common ground on this topic. Instead, you sided with those who refused to even hear a different point of view. One of the q folks contacted Jim R. and he nicely asked me to leave that specific thread. Not a single post of mine was pulled, and I broke no FR rules. My big crime was I didn’t agree with the crowds, and bagsters point of view.
Honestly RN, are the comments from bagster that I posted ok with you? I pretty much thought you were respectful of JR’s rules, and these comments don’t pass that test.
Messy business.
That’s great.
Hey snowybear can i steal this from ya its so good i cant believe it:
Seen on Gab:
Lesson in Counterinsurgency Operations on Social Media:
One common and effective tactic used to divide this movement against itself, is to utilize a seemingly innocent third party in order to antagonize popular people into a game of “he said, she said”.
It works like this:
I ask you something about someone for the sole purpose of getting an off-hand negative response, the question will frame this as to be unavoidable. Then I use that negative response in order to provoke a reaction from party B. Party B, assuming itself wrongly maligned, will defend itself by attacking Party A, who has no interest in any negative engagement whatsoever. All the while, the third party, who orchestrated the chaos to begin with, remains unnoticed, a seemingly anonymous bystander to the event.
The more popular an account, the more effective this technique becomes. And it is incredibly destructive to the morale of people on all sides.
It relies only on personal ego, and should be something you learn to recognize because it is constantly being wielded against this movement. Never engage with attacking your own, enough ground has been lost this way.
Stay United.
https://gab.com/EWillHelpYou/posts/106322595537557906
::God bless our faithful young people! It isn’t easy for them in these times.::
~~~~~
AMEN
Nice little white square! ;-)
Ancient comp currently that won’t show me lots of things. Soon will have something that doesn’t need hand cranking.
Honestly RN, are the comments from bagster that I posted ok with you? I pretty much thought you were respectful of JR’s rules, and these comments don’t pass that test.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I’ll take that as a ‘No’ to my request you take it off thread.
I used to go crazy when they said that sh_t but now I just explain to them they are too stupid to walk and chew gum and move along.
.
Great job on that parent! He called them out and stated his mind freely and forcefully. And without burning any buildings or destroying any statues.
bttt
This type of response should not be ok. After getting that response, norsky fought back. When norsky fought back, LJ decided to scold them both. I never said that LJ insulted someone, bagster did, and not only was his insulting post ignored, but LJ wanted the conversation that norsky was promoting about evil and satan to be stopped. She claimed it wasn’t Q material, I disagree, so did many others.
Again, I don’t know you, I don’t know LJ, I don’t think I have ever had a covo with norsky. But, this idea that posters on here should scold people whose topics they disagree with is just wrong. If you disagree, then disagree. If you don’t care enough about the topic, then skip it. Not you yellow, but many on here need to understand that when they start scolding grown adults, they will get pushback. So don’t complain about the pushback they started.
——-
Who made YOU the referee?
A cyber apple pie for your trouble 
Honestly RN, are the comments from bagster that I posted ok with you?
And I’ll take that as a no to my request to read comments that go against forum rules and determine if they are acceptable or not.
Thank you! That was OUTSTANDING!
Bottom line for FR: We have too many waaay too many demoncrats to take out to bother with in-fighting. It makes no sense.
I read what you posted and I read what you posted again, you did nothing wrong, you are just fine...
You are a very good asset to this site and I enjoy what you post as do others...
——
I agree with HL. The only problem here is an occasional poster jumped in the middle of a family “discussion”
Bagster is Bagster, LJ is LJ and Norsky is Norsky…I think we can all live with that.
So you have a problem with Bagster?
Take it to PM.
I tire of your complaints.
MelQ 🐸
Inside Paper:
LIST OF WEBSITES SEIZED BY US:
Almaalomah
kataibhezbolla
kafmedia
Alfarat News
Al Naeem TV
Asiasat TV
Karbala TV
Afaq TV
Al Masaraloula TV
Assirat TV
Al Eshraq TV
Al Anwar TV
Interaz TV
Press TV
Sabreen News
Hadi TV
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
