Posted on 03/20/2021 7:11:03 PM PDT by ransomnote
I've been collecting links and information and posting it, along with many others, all over FR. It's important to save this information because content on the CDC's website and other websites is rewritten and removed soon after people start to reference it in debates. I've begun to collect and update it in one place.
I didn't keep track of where I obtained the links and some of the contents. I provide credit for exerpts of user comments wherever I can. ThankQ to all FReepers who are sharing information and working against the unprecedented level of medical censorship we're facing.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Covid-19 'vaccines' are mis-classified. They are gene therapies which have been classified as 'vaccines' in order to protect manufacturers from liability, and to lure people into wanting them. They do not prevent disease or stop you from transmitting the illnesses to others - which is what vaccines do.
On 3/4/2021, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) displayed the definition of the term vaccine on its website:
"A vaccine is a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease. Immunity is the protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected."
In several instances I read or watched videos featuring Physicians and other experts pointing out that the vaccine companies have defined their Covid-19 treatments as gene therapies in their own marketing information. The above definition of a vaccine was compatible with standard medical practice so the physicians didn't quote the CDC, they put it in laymans terms but it meant the same thing.
Fauci has stressed a tiny portion of the true nature of these gene therapies by explaining to the public that you’d still be able to transmit the virus to others, you’d still be able to get the illness yourself, but it’s hoped that the vaccine will reduce the severity of the disease.
When the public started waking up to the fact that we were again being lied to, the CDC watered down and reformatted their definitions to mean whatever it had to mean. I think the modification is recent because the trolls on FR once again began sneering that they really are vaccines. The watered-down, deceptive definition of vaccine is located at the link below.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm.
The CDC lies on demand - they were slow enough to rewrite their website this time that I got the text from it first.
The gene therapies are not specifically designed to attack Covid's version of the corona virus. Since the Covid-19 virus was not available in isolated form when the gene therapies were developed (Covid-19 has still not been isolated), the therapies were designed to respond to viruses similar, but not the same as Covid-19. So if you have had other illneses, you've probably already developed the anti-bodies you'd get from the experimental gene therapy.
The Covid-19 vaccines are actually experimental gene therapies. They are based on mRNA technology invented in 2005. Since that time no illness was successfully treated with that technology.
As this information emerges into the public forum, the 'experts' are beginning to say that they appear to inhibit transmission after all. I think they are citing the decline in Covid-19 deaths, 'cases' (false positives?). But Corona viruses burn themselves out in a year anyway, like Sars 1 did. There are other reasons for reductions (growing herd immunity, the public is now accessing OTC remedies by Dr. Zelenko.
Here's the website and image from Zelenko's website:
Doctor | Vladimir Zev Zelenko M.D. | United States (vladimirzelenkomd.com)
Here's Dr. Zelenko's protocol, which can be comprised of either prescription medications or from OTC remedies. NOte that he offers prevention protocol and a treatment protocol
Zelenko Treatment Protocol - Google Docs
Zelenko Covid-19 Prophylaxis Protocol - Google Docs
Deaths severe illnesses are also decreasing because people are simply purchasing both an online medical appointment and the HCQ/AZ/zinc protocol medications at the following link. I don't think the price is firm (may vary) but one FReeper said they paid about $150 total).
https://speakwithanmd.com/americasfrontlinedoctors/
Those who obtained prescription for the Zelenko protocol or Ivermectin, but can't get a pharmacy to fill it because bureaucrats have seized control of our medical system can still purchess both Ivermectin and the HCQ medications at this online pharmacy.
Buy Prescription Medicines From Online Pharmacy Store | AllDayChemist
Those who can't get a prescription for Ivermectin tablets have shared their experiences and dose amounts using Ivermectin paste used with horses. They do this because they feel betrayed by the FAUCI fiasco. Both Ivermecting and the Zelenko Protocol drugs have all completed challenging FDA approval process and have been used for many years (60 years for HCQ for those who have Lupus). If the FDA wanted to, it could have let physicians write prescriptions for Ivermectin 'off label' as is common practice.
At the start of Covid-19, NO MEDICATIONS were permitted to treat the illness. If the FDA wanted to, it could have awarded Ivermectin/HCQ the Emergency Use Authorization it too quickly gave the Covid-19 vaccines. This EUA would have allowed early victims of the illness receive the 'right to try' because the benefits outweighed the risks, a criteria for EUA. But the captured medical industry insisted people go without treatment to fan the claims of an unmanageable 'pandemic'. Many illnesses could be similarly fanned into fake pandemic if all treatments were denied them. Once hospitalized, early WHO/CDC recommendations for ventilators were too agressive and damaged diseased lung tissue, and still the patient couldn't recieve available FDA drugs (HCQ/Ivermecting). They did this to force the EUA authoriztaion of the Covid-19 drugs that could never make it to the public any other way.
The mRNA in the Covid19 vaccines is technology previously used to try to create a vaccine for HIV and other Corona Viruses in the past. They never could get it to work for HIV or any other disease-it never cured anybody because it never made it past the animal trials in 2005 and 2012 ( all the animals died). After injection, the animals displayed elevated antibodies as expected. But when the animals were exposed to the actual Corona Viruses they were testing, their immune system overeacted (i.e. Antibody Enhancement Reaction).
Note that the Covid-19 manufacturers are claiming they are 95% effective, but effective at what? The Covid-19 vaccine are supposedly 95% effective at triggering the production of antibodies - the percentage is unrelated to their actual impact on the disease itself. The manufacturers wouldn't release their data when they received Emergency Use Authorization (NOT FDA approval).
In a British medical journal, an associate editor (Dr. Doshie? (sp)) said that, based on the data, the vaccines are likely about 19% effective instead of manufactuers and MSM claims that they are 95% effective. At this low rate, they never would have been approved for use. With the current data comparisons of the covid-19 vaccines with 91 other vaccines in the CDC's VAERs database, they will likely be recognized as too hazardous for use.
The Covid vaccines were not developed specifically for the Covid virus because there are still no isolated samples of Covid-19 for the researchers to use. The fact that no sample of Covid-19 is available anywhere is 'of concern'. The PCR tests were created without the Covid-19 virus samples too - they don't detect the pressence of Covid-19 viruses specifically, they detect the presence of fragments of proteins found in numerous other viruses and other materials. The following link discusses the fact that the Covid tests do not indicate the presence of the disease
The current Covid-19 gene therapies were never sufficiently tested, skipped the rigorous testing period required for FDA approval and after a few months of testing on volunteers starting in July of 2020, was given an "Emergency Use Authorization", so it's not FDA approved. It's EUA or 'Authorized' on the (false) belief that no other safe medications or treatments are available; that's why they have to prevent HCQ and Ivermectin from being available to the public - otherwise these gene therapies would have to go through rigorous testing in addition, which they know will fail as mRNA has been failing to treat illness or obtain FDA approval for 15 years.
In the video below, I think he's too general when he uses the term "approved" re the FDA because he shows elsewhere he knows they are experimental, therefore not FDA approved but "authorized". At the 8 minute mark, he's talking about side-effects etc. E.g., it seems likely that there is no way to turn off the spike proteins the Covid-19 therapies tell the cells to make so they are theoretically always churning out new ones, driving the body to fight and likely to trigger long term autoimune issues.
Video By Dr. Steve Hotze (h/t greeneyes)
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/068/967/505/original/8da6bfe9c4627687.mp4
I'll add another video below of an interview with pro-vaccine industry, Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD, DVM He is a vaccine research expert who has worked for a long list of companies and organizations on vaccine discovery and preclinical research, including GSK, Novartis, Solvay Biologicals, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Dr Vanden Bossche also coordinated the Ebola vaccine program at GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization).
A FReeper riciduled Vanden Bossche because he is a DVM. A FReeper clarified Vanden Bossche's expert knowledge regarding vaccines in a post on a prior thread. I'll put an excerpt of that post below. If not interested in Vanden Bossche's credentials, skip down to second row of dotted lines.
====================
My spouse, a PhD who works on clinical trials, was not all that impressed until I provided a more complete resume...You seemed to question a DVM, but I have been told it has been more difficult to get in to Vet school than Med school.
Video has Vanden Bossche employment history at 3:13 minute mark—numerous senior roles, all vaccine related at GSK Biologicals, Novartis, Solvay Biologicals, Bill Linda Gates Foundation, GAVI, Univac, and Vareco.
Vanden Bossche studied at Ghent University for his M.D. in Veterinary Medicine from 1980 to 1983. He then obtained his Postdoctoral training in Equine Medicine and Surgery at the Free University of Berlin (1984-1987).
From 1990, Vanden Bossche underwent a Postdoctoral Fellowship in Virology at James A. Baker Institute for Animal Health, Cornell University in New York.
He was board certified in Veterinary Virology in 1990. Two years later he was Board certified in Veterinary Microbiology and Animal Hygiene. What boards? Well likely in Europe.
Some of the other universities where Geert Vanden Bossche has worked as an academic include the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin, the University of Hohenheim in Stuttgart, the REGA Institute, KU Leuven in Belgium.
Open letter? Not written by him? Uh I think it was...Yes, he tweeted it but he wrote it too...(search is your friend), and I think it was on Linked-in, which you, having such credentials, can probably verify.
The schedule for the summit you provided was labeled tentative, so perhaps he changed the subject? Don’t know...
If you want to check out some voluntary reports to the CDC's VAERs database, I provide some examples and instructions on how to use the database in the thread below.
As a head's up, the videos I've reviewed indicate that the AztraZeneca vaccine may be worse, with one doctor suggesting that it may cause spread to persons who don't get the vaccine. Many countries in the EU paused the administration of Aztrazeneca's vaccine for observed medical reactions in patients. 2 days ago bureaucrats over ruled them and said, 'nothing to see here, move along'.
The following video shows a comedian asking Fauci questions that 'journalists' just won't ask. It's great:
Have to give the Democrats/Stalinists and their fellow sociopaths credit; they’ve developed a ‘kinder, gentler’ form of mass murder.
There are vaccines that are protein only vaccines. Flublok, Hepatitis B vaccine are in general use. They inject proteins that are expressed on the surface of the virus they are made to protect against. So if protein only vaccines have not caused this "blinding" there is no reason to suspect that the mRNA vaccine would do the same.
From my basic understanding of what was written, the 'vaccine' changes they body's ability to produce proteins that fight any enemy cells to the ability to fight the specific (covid) cells.
The effect of an mRNA vaccine is local to the injection site (Your implication is that these vaccines cause a huge systemic change to a large number of cells through out the body). It will affect cells in that area only. Remember these vaccines must be refrigerated or the mRNA degrades. So once injected into a body the half-life of the mRNA molecule kicks in and it will be gone in a couple of days. In the mean time the cells that produce the protein will present the protein to the immune system. These cells will ultimately be destroyed by the immune system. There is no replication that is passed on to other cells. So this idea that there is no way to tell the cells to go back is wrong when it comes to mRNA based vaccines.
Is that why your guy Fauci (who you hate to defend) says the vaccine' will only be effective for a short time and then you'll have to keep on getting them?
He's not my guy. I provided information from the pfizer clinical trials as to why he would say something like this. From anecdotal evidence they are seeing reinfections to people who caught COVID-19 6 months prior. They believe recovering from COVID-19 provides at least 3 months of immunity and that it wanes on an individual basis there after. We don't know yet how long the vaccines will protect an individual for.
Will they have to design a new vaccine each time a new strain is released by the Chinese?
Probably. If you take an accidental view of this and the fact that virologists in China would likely have been vaccinated for COVID-19. Then a new strain that escapes would likely not be covered by our current vaccine.
Yet the other doctor that Ransomnote cited seems to think so. And are you sure these 'protein only' vaccines act the same as this mRNA vaccine?
How are you so sure?
The effect of an mRNA vaccine is local to the injection site (Your implication is that these vaccines cause a huge systemic change to a large number of cells through out the body). It will affect cells in that area only.
Remember these vaccines must be refrigerated or the mRNA degrades. So once injected into a body the half-life of the mRNA molecule kicks in and it will be gone in a couple of days.
In the mean time the cells that produce the protein will present the protein to the immune system. These cells will ultimately be destroyed by the immune system. There is no replication that is passed on to other cells. So this idea that there is no way to tell the cells to go back is wrong when it comes to mRNA based vaccines.
This makes some sense, if true, but my Doctorate in common sense wonders how a liquid injected into the body would not disperse throughout the entire body. And again, Ransomnote's expert seems to disagree.
Then a new strain that escapes would likely not be covered by our current vaccine.
I'm not so concerned about viruses 'escaping' as I am of the Democrats and the Chinese purposefully releasing more and different man-made, biological weapons.
stig: There are vaccines that are protein only vaccines. Flublok, Hepatitis B vaccine are in general use. They inject proteins that are expressed on the surface of the virus they are made to protect against. So if protein only vaccines have not caused this "blinding" there is no reason to suspect that the mRNA vaccine would do the same.
ransomnote:
Dear stig,
I do wonder why you won't read the content before making wishful statements about the Covid 'shots'.
Your inclusion of protein only vaccines like Flublok and Hebaptitus B actually makes you look like a disinfo specialist. Those two vaccines, while they are protein only vaccines, do not use the mRNA technology which causes the 'blinding' that vaccine experts and physicians are warning about.
Your comment 'there's no reason to suspect that the mRNA vaccine would do the same appears to be intentionaly wrong, particularly when posted on a thread specifically describing the failed history of mRNA vaccines, and the fact that they are currently ranked #2 and #3 in VAERS, out of a total of 93 vaccines, for the side effect known as 'death' after about 6 weeks of implementation
bagster: From my basic understanding of what was written, the 'vaccine' changes they body's ability to produce proteins that fight any enemy cells to the ability to fight the specific (covid) cells.
ransomnote: That is indeed what the physicians, vaccine and immunology experts I've been reading have been warning about.
stig: The effect of an mRNA vaccine is local to the injection site (Your implication is that these vaccines cause a huge systemic change to a large number of cells through out the body). It will affect cells in that area only.
ransomnote: All the animals in the mRNA platform trials died, from an overly enhanced immune response (immune response 'over-heated'), and this 'side effect' was not localized. Your response doesn't make sense because the so-called vaccine wouldn't work if it's effects were localized to the injection site.
VAERS and social media are full of accounts of cerebral blood clots, ADE, all over body rashes, fevers of 102. People feel sick for days, weeks or longer and details describe exhaustion and overall malaise.
Would be good if you read the materials before posting.
stig: Remember these vaccines must be refrigerated or the mRNA degrades. So once injected into a body the half-life of the mRNA molecule kicks in and it will be gone in a couple of days.
ransomnote: Again, your response is not logical. The systemic immune response is not gone in a couple of days.
"The Moderna vaccine is viable for 12 hours after being removed from refrigeration."
Wisconsin pharmacist deliberately removed vaccine vials from refrigerator (msn.com)
The average body temperature is 98. 6 degrees so by your reasoning the vaccine would be active for 12 hours after injection; beyond that point the vaccine is considered inactive. There are no long-term studies upon which you can base your optimism because in platform trials, all the animals died and it never made it to human testing.
The reason Fauci is saying they don't know how long the immune response lasts is because it's never been proven in studies.
Still, it doesn't matter if the effects last 3 months, 6 months or longer because you can die if you have NO immune response to illnesses long before then or experience a 'runaway' immune response to a pathogen as a result of the Covid 'shot'.
stig: In the mean time the cells that produce the protein will present the protein to the immune system. These cells will ultimately be destroyed by the immune system.
ransomnote: Medical and immunological experts explain in the post at the top of the thread, which you apparently have not read, this therapy can induce auto immunity problems and what Vanden Bossche calls 'escape', the failure of the immune system to recognize diseases during the unknown length of time the so-called vaccine is active.
stig: There is no replication that is passed on to other cells. So this idea that there is no way to tell the cells to go back is wrong when it comes to mRNA based vaccines.
ransomnote: Physicians and experts like Vanden Bossche point out there is no way to shut off the production of the protein if it's triggering anaphylaxis, cerebal blood clots or other life threatening side effects in the patient.
The duration of the effects are unknown but, for example, in the animal trials in which the immune systems over-reacted, there's no way to tell the cells to stop producing the protein and this effect need only last long enough for the person to finally stroke out or fry their own body with an uncontrolled immune response.
There is no way to tell the cells to 'go back in time to save a struggling patient.
bagster: Is that why your guy Fauci (who you hate to defend) says the vaccine' will only be effective for a short time and then you'll have to keep on getting them?
stig: He's not my guy. I provided information from the pfizer clinical trials as to why he would say something like this. From anecdotal evidence they are seeing reinfections to people who caught COVID-19 6 months prior. They believe recovering from COVID-19 provides at least 3 months of immunity and that it wanes on an individual basis there after. We don't know yet how long the vaccines will protect an individual for.
ransomnote: They intentionally selected the PCR test because it does not indicate the presence of the Covid-19 virus, which has never been isolated anyway. The inventor of the PCR test objected to it's use because it would not function in a public health setting because it would not distinguish between who is, and who is not, sick.
So the supposed 'reinfection' of a person 6 months later is meaningless. The PCR test can falsely 'identify' Covid-19 is Coca Cola and tropical fruit because it exagerates the presence of one specific series of molecular chains which can be present in both organic and inorganic, and the WHO PCR test identifies a sequence that is present in human DNA (so anyone can test postive for 'Covid' at any time if a sequence of molecules from their own DNA is present in the sample).
It's all fake, stig. The fake pandemic was created by denying all available FDA approved drugs to treat a respiratory illness until hospitalization occured and then employing ventilators which applied excessively aggressive pressure to infected lung tissue. It was furthered by forcing covid-19 patients into nursing homes to maximize death. It was wildly exaggerated by intentionally utilizing a test known to create over 90% false positives and then counting deaths occuring within 60 days of those false positives as a 'Covid death'.
The mRNA 'shots' were developed using failed technology and basing 'results' on a test that can't determine if you are sick. The absence, to date, of any isolated sample means the tests were not developed to identify the actual virus. That's why the inventor of the test was vehement about not using the PCR for the planned-demic. You'd know this if you read the content at the top of the thread.
bagster: Will they have to design a new vaccine each time a new strain is released by the Chinese?
stig: Probably. If you take an accidental view of this and the fact that virologists in China would likely have been vaccinated for COVID-19. Then a new strain that escapes would likely not be covered by our current vaccine.
ransomnote: The vaccine is the real biowarfare agent and they are not done attacking the public with it yet. There's no reason to outsource the human immune system; we can let it function as it has throughout human history without relying on the next untested experimental 'dose' to come down the pike.
I'll have more time after work today to add paper citations.
Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives
lockdownsceptics.org ^ | September 20, 2020 | Dr Michael Yeadon
Posted on 3/22/2021, 10:13:02 AM by ransomnote
The article and graphic you shared "mRNA: Fulfilling the Promise of Gene Therapy". Is typical of the semantics I see being played. If someone was just scanning your post the take away is mRNA is gene therapy and from the perspective of the general public the take away is "they are playing with my DNA". Without reading the article or studying the graphic (with some underlying knowledge of cellular biology) you would miss the important fact that the mRNA is inserting itself downstream of the typical cellular protein manufacturing process.
On close inspection of the diagram, the mRNA box has a dashed outline indicating this class of therapy skips the first step of DNA transcription into RNA. Further you would need some knowledge of cellular biology to understand that cellular schematic which shows delivery of mRNA into the cytoplasm and that the nucleus of the cell is not involved in the process.
While this is considered "Gene" therapy the "Gene" in this instance of mRNA exists in lab used to manufacture the mRNA. Delivery of the mRNA is only targeted at the cytoplasm. In the nucleus of the cell the enzymes and DNA remain untouched.
For 15 years that RNA vaccine platform has failed to cure HIV, Hep C, and other corona virus types, and it DID kill all the animals in the trials.
Mice and Pigs protamine encapsulated mRNA for rabies (different from lipid nanoparticles) 2016:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4918980/
and in human volunteers from 2013 to 2016 reported in 2017 (abstract only):
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28754494/
By 2016 the current lipid nanoparticle technology reported on:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439223/
2017 used in mice to target melanoma:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5523404/
moderna mRNA influenza vaccine tested in mice, ferrets, monkeys and interim report on human trials 2017:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475249/
Finally animal trials were conducted on the current moderna vaccine reported 2020:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2024671
So there are positive animal trials on mRNA technology. Most recently the study in Macaques. This leads to where we are now with human Phase 1, 2 clinical trials completed on 2 different mRNA vaccines. With both vaccines completing primary endpoint in Phase 3 trials and those trials continuing observation over vaccine recipients.
That's a crucial part in which the companies are lying to the public. They are saying that their products are up to 95% effective. They are intentionally leading the public to think their statement means 95% effective against Covid-19. It does not mean that. The products are actually 95% percent effective in triggering the production of the antibodies specified by the companies.
They calculate 95% based on how many people have confirmed COVID-19, vaccine vs placebo:
Pfizer results:
"8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose were observed among vaccine recipients and 162 among placebo recipients. This case split corresponds to 95.0% vaccine efficacy (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.3 to 97.6; Table 2)"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
Moderna Results:
"Symptomatic Covid-19 illness was confirmed in 185 participants in the placebo group (56.5 per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 48.7 to 65.3) and in 11 participants in the mRNA-1273 group (3.3 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.0); vaccine efficacy was 94.1% (95% CI, 89.3 to 96.8%; P<0.001)"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389
ERROR CORRECTION to my earlier post 42:
I had said before that cellular effects were local this was incorrect. There is lymphatic spread and distant lymph nodes and the spleen will get a significant dosing of this vaccine. From there it can spread to other organs (likely through the blood) but at a reduced amount. The total dosing received is dependent on the size of the dose of the vaccine. This data is based on trials in mice. This is similar to how other vaccines spread (modified virus type vaccines included).
As a postscript I will add this link to a detailed review of the various types of mRNA technology that is in use or being researched:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2024671
For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.
Pasted from <https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/americas-frontline-doctor-simone-gold-warns-of-risks-in-experimental-covid-vaccine-video/>
1. The virus causing the DISEASE COVID-19 has been identified and isolated. The name scientists gave given that isolated virus is SARS-CoV-2.
2. Each individual SARS-CoV-2 virus is covered with many identical copies of the virus’ spike protein. It’s that unique spike protein that the mRNA vaccines cause the immune system to produce antibodies for.
3. So, no, the vaccine makers didn’t “chose a spike protein for another type of corona virus”.
Got more smoke to blow?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
According to Moderna, "Recognizing the broad potential of mRNA science, we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the "program” or “app” is our mRNA drug - the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.
Note that 'selection of the spike protein' occurs through the manufacturer's selection of the mRNA sequence for their 'vaccine', which for Moderna occurred on the timeline below on January 13, 2020 and was done with the help of Anthony Fauci's division at NIH.
"Most of the vaccines under development for COVID-19 only show the immune system part of the virus, a protein chosen to prime a strong immune response. (This includes the Pfizer mRNA vaccine.) So, someone who had naturally been infected with the virus might have some additional antibody types not found in someone who had been successfully vaccinated."
Antibodies From Vaccines vs. From Natural Infection (verywellhealth.com)
According to the CDC, no isolated samples of the Covid-19 virus exist. The image below cites a July 2020 document but researchers continue to say their requests for isolated samples are denied because they are "unavailable". This limitation harms the race to develop drug treatments, leaving the field open to vaccine makers.
One problem is that the vaccine triggers the production of anti-bodies that are different from the anti-bodies caused by natural Covid-19 infection. This apparently is highy sensitive information that is being scrupulously scrubbed from the internet.
Here's an example of a doctor who died weeks after receiving the 2nd does of the vaccine. He had one type of antibody from the vaccine, and another from the natural Covid infection. I do remember reading about instances where the antibodies developed in response to natural vs vaccine spike protein in the middle of last year, but that kind of lets the cat out of the bag and history is now being rewritten.
I've been wondering how the vaccine developers are creating their mRNA for Covid-19 if they don't have isolated samples. Perhaps the first sentence of this article answers my question.
"On Jan. 10, Chinese scientists uploaded the genetic sequence of a novel coronavirus, later named SARS-CoV-2, to an open-access website, GenBank."
It looks like China uploaded the genome to the biowarfare agent they released in order to help us develop a virus to protect ourselves from it.
Personally I believe that China's biowarfare agent is likely the combination of both the Covid-19 virus and the vaccines being created based on the genetic sequence they gave us.
Both the SARS-CoV-2 and vaccine mRNA have access to the reverse transcriptase enzyme, both of them can ‘upload’ their genetic sequence to the DNA (Modify the DNA to include their own images).
I think China may have outsourced biowarfare.
“According to the CDC, no isolated samples of the Covid-19 virus exist. The image below cites a July 2020 document but researchers continue to say their requests for isolated samples are denied because they are “unavailable”....”
*****************************************************************
The above is NOT TRUE:
The disease named COVID-19 is caused by the virus given the name SARS-CoV-2. And the CDC has, in fact, long since ISOLATED the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the laboratory and routinely makes it readily available for research by the scientific and medical community.
Here is the timeline for those efforts:
1. On January 20, 2020, CDC received a clinical specimen collected from the first reported U.S. patient infected with SARS-CoV-2. CDC immediately placed the specimen into cell culture to grow a sufficient amount of virus for study.
2. On February 2, 2020, CDC generated enough SARS-CoV-2 grown in cell culture to distribute to medical and scientific researchers.
3. On February 4, 2020, CDC shipped SARS-CoV-2 to the BEI Resources Repository.
Here is a link with supporting information on the isolation of the virus that causes COVID-19.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html
I Decline To Reply
If you are receiving this post, it's my personal opinion that, based on my prior experience posting to you, there 's no point in replying to you unless it involves content that I was already interested in posting about.
Reasons you may be receiving this post include, but are not limited to:
Ignoring prior replies as if you've never received a response from me on the same content before. There are people to whom I have spent time composing replies, seeking links to articles, videos, PDF's etc. After I post my response, they continue to make the same accusations as if they have not been amply refuted.
Pretending you are unaware of obvious information, and instead insisting I spell it out to you with full, defensible rationales and links.
Posting to me with little to no thought /effort and then demanding I reply as long as you continue to post to me, as often as you post to me until your get tired or want to go to lunch.
When refuted, responding by moving the goal posts, shifting the context, playing victim, changing the subject etc.
game playing
Seizing on typos, proof reading errors etc. as reasons to declare my post retuted or debunked
Abusive comments, epithets, profanity
Lying
It's likely some receiving this post will portray it as proof I'm incapable of admitting I'm wrong, providing a valid response, disproving their assertion or supporting my own. However, my time is not their to direct into futile endeavors.
Others receiving this post will likely agree that our exchanges are not mutually beneficial, and will gladly move on to post to others.
Shame on you, but hahahaha.
She kicks your ass and walks off.
Like a boss.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I've wondered how they did it.
As of July 2020 the CDC was saying that the isolate was unavailable. Note that in the first line of my post above, I use the word 'exist' where I should have used 'available'. Elsewhere in the thread post, I confirm I know the Covid-19 existance by saying I think it's a bioweapon and noting the properties it shares with the vacinne mRNA and HIV virus.
I have read/heard physicians and researchers complaints that isolated samples were still unavailable.
I've been trying to figure out how why this could happen. I think the CDC may be 'awarding' samples to favored researchers/organizations.
We know things about the virus, like it has fragments of HIV, and can upload it's sequence into the host's DNA. At the same time, some Dr's and researchers were denied requested samples, and being told none were available. Therefore, I wonder if the doctors/researchers denied samples are calling the CDC's bluff with taunts and digs about the virus not existing with the intention of provoking a release of samples "Put up, or shut up."
Lately I'm finding articles saying that the creation of the vaccines spike protein, which is coded by the RNA sequence, is based on China's Covid-19 genome. This means we are 'taking China's word for it' and selecting a sequence of the genome to build our mRNA vaccines. I don't think we have reason to trust China's genome.
Now, in the human trials they say they expose people to the virus but I don't know the method of exposure or if the vaccine companies are being honest (more about that below).
I don't trust the CDC's assertions about the availability of isolates after catching them lying to the nation and harming public health.
I've encountered many accounts of denied requests for it. I know the CDC revises their website freely to alter the narrative so I can't really rely on them as a source. I will need to find sources other than the vaccine companies and the CDC to find out if/when sources of isolated Covid-19 virus are available and what criteria may/may not drive their selection of recipients.
I don't feel bad about not having proof because the CDC and the vaccine manufacturers are definitely lying about so much, they really can't expect me to take their word for it. All negative information about the Covid-19 planned-demic and vaccines is being purged, so we fall back to secondary sources and then those doing the purging ridicule us for relying on secondary sources or struggles to find valid information at all.
The current censorship is removing access to anything but the 'narrative' and the narrative is tragically false (needless shutdown, masks, concealing vaccine risks etc.)
Of greater concern to me is that some of the vaccine trials appear to be faked or modified to prove what they want it to prove, so I am not convinced that they actually exposed people to Covid-19 in the trials yet.
The vaccine manufactures' designed their human trials to diagnose Covid-19 based on the presence of at lest one Covid-19 related symptom (many are common to other illnesses like the flu) and the PCR test. But the PCR does not indicate the presence of the virus, it indicates the presence of a sequence of molecules found in many different things, like motor oil, fruit, goats etc. Here's a thread that provides the details about the impossible way the vaccine companies manage to get data which supports their products using the PCR, which does not test for the virus, but tests for the matirals from a variety of many different sources.
The ramifications of the continuing deception re Covid-19, and the reliance on the PCR (by Fauci, vaccine companies) are tremendously damaging. How am I to trust what these same say about who received what samples, if the samples were the the same Covid-19 identified elsehwere, or if they tell us they subjected trial participants to the live virus.
The Covid-19 vaccine trials can't be valid based on an invalid test for Covid-19.
Posted on 3/25/2021, 11:44:49 PM by ransomnote
Posted on 3/25/2021, 11:44:49 PM by ransomnote
Thank you.
Ping
>It’s important to save this information because content on the CDC’s website and other websites is rewritten and removed soon after people start to reference it in debates. I’ve begun to collect and update it in one place.
I want to make sure you and others are fully aware of the primary internet archive sites.
Both are worth spending some time on to understand how they work.
Anything important should be saved locally, but creating a record at these sites is quite useful as well.
Good!
I’ll go ahead and throw my text block on the thread. Most of you have seen it, but hopefully others will see this.
I’ve been pushing Ivermectin here for at least a few months at this point.
IANAD or public health professional, but my understanding is that technically, the vaccines are not “approved”, but rather have “emergency use authorizations.” These EUAs could only be granted if there were no available effective therapeutics. So the FedGov public health establishment had to refuse to recognize the efficacy of HCQ and Ivermectin-based therapies in order to be able to grant those EUAs. By doing this, they greatly increased the death and suffering due to Covid.
If we had a public health edifice that was worth anything, front line health care workers and public-facing store employees would be on Covid prophylaxis, and could have been for months. The Federal public health agencies (FDA/NIH/CDC) have seemingly completely ignored cheap effective re-purposed therapeutics that could have significantly reduced deaths and transmission.
Ivermectin is effective for COVID-19: meta analysis of 35 studies
https://ivmmeta.com/
Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
Key protocols from this group use Ivermectin.
COVID Care for Clinicians
https://www.evms.edu/covid-19/covid_care_for_clinicians/
Ditto this group.
India has been using HCQ and Ivermectin for many months as therapeutics and for prophylaxis. Their curves are quite impressive, scroll down to see them here.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/india/
Anyone able to interpret a basic graph will be impressed. Why is this not being talked about in Western media?
Also from India:
Ziverdo Kit Contains Zinc Acetate 50 mg, Doxycycline 100 mg & Ivermectin 12 mg Dispersible Tablets. It is currently indicated in the first line treatment for COVID-19 positive patients. Quadruple Therapy with Ivermectin is effective in treating COVID-19
https://www.rxindia.com/medicines/medicines-by-therapeutic-class/covid-19/ziverdo-kit/
That’s a link to an Indian online pharmacy selling that Covid treatment kit for under $2, just add vitamin D3.
The Mystery Behind India’s Success in Flattening the Curve
https://covexit.com/the-mystery-behind-india-success-in-flattening-the-curve/
Hint: There are a several hundred million HCQ and Ivermectin tablets as a key component of early therapeutic regimens.
Also, the meta-study link has links to a number of other studies. Here’s the one for HCQ.
HCQ is effective for COVID-19 when used early: real-time meta analysis of 197 studies
https://hcqmeta.com/
The War on ‘Misinformation’ Claims Two Victims. Truth. And the Right to Treatment.
https://trialsitenews.com/the-war-on-misinformation-claims-two-victims-truth-and-the-right-to-treatment/
I continue to think the media, Big Tech and FedGov’s handling of these therapeutics criminal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.