|
Posted on 12/08/2020 2:07:50 PM PST by ransomnote
(h/t foldspace)
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
That quote from Orwell somebody posted about deception and force, when the deception is exposed all that’s left to the, is force. I would say the lockdowns are when the force began to be applied.
Dems pure pudding defense, before the US Supreme Court.
Laughable.
This clears the way.
US House of Representatives is hopefully ready and able.
Republicans vs RINOS.
You have missed my point altogether; I wrote before all this happened that the suit had a better chance of being heard by SCOTUS if other states would sign on and join in. Florida was one of the first and the number has grown.
I was just blowing my own horn {for being ahead of the flood...} not very well since you had no idea what I was talking about.
About the speculation that our aircraft carriers are being deployed to defend the continental US from attack (China, UN?) Apparently it’s not unusual for the carriers to be operating off of the US coasts at this time of year.
Link shows deployed carrier strike groups on December 10, 2019
https://news.usni.org/2019/12/10/usni-news-fleet-and-marine-tracker-dec-10-2019
December 7, 2020...
https://news.usni.org/2020/12/07/usni-news-fleet-and-marine-tracker-dec-7-2020
They still haven’t changed the picture on the SCOTUS website.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/justices.aspx
I pitched a b$tch to the site a while ago about this.
Here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/contact/contact_pio.aspx
I just did so again, this time to the webmaster. maybe some others could also.
I believe they just responded...see post above yours.
In the old days (late 1960s) there were gas stations that would sell you cheap used oil from oil changes for 1 quart oil per filled tank used cars. No point in wasting fresh oil since it was going to drain out anyway.
SC is going to hear Eastman vs. Dimwits.
Read the academic differences of LAW and seriousness.
Case closed. Court will legitimize the Texas complaint and dutifully drop kick it to the House.
And you were correct! Good job Bob!
How are you feeling??
(Out to do something now. Will check in later!)
Which means POTUS reelected (officially) before Christmas?
I know. That’s the point. It was a crap political statement. They didn’t address the specific threat...copped out with “Threats to either Democrats or Republicans”...
**********************
Gotcha...I’m slow on the uptake.
Having directed the selection of presidential electors by popular vote in Pennsylvania, the General Assembly choosing its own slate of electors ex post would be unconstitutional. Kelly v. Commonwealth, 2020 WL 7018314, *5 (Pa., Nov. 28, 2020) (Wecht, J., concurring). “There is no basis in [state] law by which the courts may grant [a] request to ignore the results of an election and recommit the choice to the General Assembly to substitute its preferred slate of electors for the one chosen by a majority of Pennsylvania's voters.” Id. at 3. The “General Assembly ‘directed the manner’ of appointing presidential electors by popular vote nearly a century ago.” Ibid. (quoting U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1, cl. 2). There is nothing in the Election Code that 23 permits the General Assembly to “circumvent [this method and] to substitute its preferred slate of electors for that ‘elected by the qualified electors of the Commonwealth.’” Id. at 4 (quoting 25 P.S. § 3191). For the General Assembly to “alter that ‘method of appointment’” would require new legislation, done “in accordance with constitutional mandates, including presentment of the legislation to the governor to sign or veto.” Ibid. (quoting McPherson, 146 U.S. at 25).
This is utterly laughable.
The US Constitution Trumps (C W I D T ?) *ALL* State Law, and the Constitution says the Legislature alone can determine the manner of choosing electors.
Look at the first several pages of the pleading.
ALL SJW-foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric.
Example (formatting *mine*):
"Since Election Day, State and Federal courts throughout the country have been flooded with frivolous lawsuits aimed at disenfranchising large swaths of voters and undermining the legitimacy of the election. The State of Texas has now added its voice to the cacophony of bogus claims. Texas seeks to invalidate elections in four states for yielding results with which it disagrees.
Its request for this Court to exercise its original jurisdiction and then anoint Texas’s preferred candidate for President is legally indefensible and is an afront [sic] to principles of constitutional democracy.
What Texas is doing in this proceeding is to ask this Court to reconsider a mass of baseless claims about problems with the election that have already been considered, and rejected, by this Court and other courts. It attempts to exploit this Court’s sparingly used original jurisdiction to relitigate those matters. But Texas obviously lacks standing to bring such claims, which, in any event, are barred by laches, and are moot, meritless, and dangerous. Texas has not suffered harm simply because it dislikes the result of the election, and nothing in the text, history, or structure of the Constitution supports Texas’s view that it can dictate the manner in which four other states run their elections.
Nor is that view grounded in any precedent from this Court. Texas does not seek to have the Court interpret the Constitution, so much as disregard it. The cascading series of compounding defects in Texas’s filings is only underscored by the surreal alternate reality that those filings attempt to construct. That alternate reality includes an absurd statistical 2 analysis positing that the probability of PresidentElect Biden winning the election was “one in a quadrillion.” Bill of Complaint at 6. Texas’s effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no basis in law or fact. The Court should not abide this seditious abuse of the judicial process, and should send a clear and unmistakable signal that such abuse must never be replicated."
The pleading itself is a mixture of
"You're not the boss of ME"
and
"It's TOO LATE, suckers!"
and
"Every case has lost so far or been dismissed. So THERE!"
I greatly apprehensive that we're headed for Civil War, folks.
Wait! I know that I’m not an expert on geography, but what.....?!
the Hudson River It eventually drains into the Atlantic Ocean at New York Harbor.
The UN derps will never make it to the Ocean
Not much of Legal response for so important a case. Looks like the Pa. criminals can’t put up a valid response. Possibly because they are full of Shite.
Just look out for Baltimorons.
Thank you for your thoughts! Brings tears to my eyes. We must all pray for revival in our land.
Clan Rose hunting tartan
Not happening in GA. Raffesperger and Sterling have too much connection with Dominion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
